Pitfalls and pratfalls in research on an experimental community

Lessons in integrating theory and practice from the Rajneeshpuram research project

Carl A Latkin, Richard A. Littman, Norman D. Sundberg, Richard A. Hagan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A community psychology perspective guided a field study of the social‐psychological aspects of the experimental community of Rajneeshpuram, Oregon. This natural experiment illustrates methodological and theoretical challenges to research on the community level. Entry into the community and the building of rapport was a slow and dynamic process, carried out by several methods, such as feedback from respondents, focus groups, and new approaches to the roles of investigators and respondents. Although informants proved to be necessary and valuable, community researchers should be alert to cognitive biases, including the false consensus bias, personal validation, and the self‐serving bias, that may lead informants to provide inaccurate information. This project also demonstrates the importance of studying behavior in context and how methodology from psychology may be used to enhance field studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-48
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Community Psychology
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Research
Research Personnel
Psychology
Focus Groups
Consensus
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Pitfalls and pratfalls in research on an experimental community : Lessons in integrating theory and practice from the Rajneeshpuram research project. / Latkin, Carl A; Littman, Richard A.; Sundberg, Norman D.; Hagan, Richard A.

In: Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1993, p. 35-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2773d08df8564ce384f8fad71768c566,
title = "Pitfalls and pratfalls in research on an experimental community: Lessons in integrating theory and practice from the Rajneeshpuram research project",
abstract = "A community psychology perspective guided a field study of the social‐psychological aspects of the experimental community of Rajneeshpuram, Oregon. This natural experiment illustrates methodological and theoretical challenges to research on the community level. Entry into the community and the building of rapport was a slow and dynamic process, carried out by several methods, such as feedback from respondents, focus groups, and new approaches to the roles of investigators and respondents. Although informants proved to be necessary and valuable, community researchers should be alert to cognitive biases, including the false consensus bias, personal validation, and the self‐serving bias, that may lead informants to provide inaccurate information. This project also demonstrates the importance of studying behavior in context and how methodology from psychology may be used to enhance field studies.",
author = "Latkin, {Carl A} and Littman, {Richard A.} and Sundberg, {Norman D.} and Hagan, {Richard A.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1002/1520-6629(199301)21:1<35::AID-JCOP2290210105>3.0.CO;2-Y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "35--48",
journal = "Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0090-4392",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pitfalls and pratfalls in research on an experimental community

T2 - Lessons in integrating theory and practice from the Rajneeshpuram research project

AU - Latkin, Carl A

AU - Littman, Richard A.

AU - Sundberg, Norman D.

AU - Hagan, Richard A.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - A community psychology perspective guided a field study of the social‐psychological aspects of the experimental community of Rajneeshpuram, Oregon. This natural experiment illustrates methodological and theoretical challenges to research on the community level. Entry into the community and the building of rapport was a slow and dynamic process, carried out by several methods, such as feedback from respondents, focus groups, and new approaches to the roles of investigators and respondents. Although informants proved to be necessary and valuable, community researchers should be alert to cognitive biases, including the false consensus bias, personal validation, and the self‐serving bias, that may lead informants to provide inaccurate information. This project also demonstrates the importance of studying behavior in context and how methodology from psychology may be used to enhance field studies.

AB - A community psychology perspective guided a field study of the social‐psychological aspects of the experimental community of Rajneeshpuram, Oregon. This natural experiment illustrates methodological and theoretical challenges to research on the community level. Entry into the community and the building of rapport was a slow and dynamic process, carried out by several methods, such as feedback from respondents, focus groups, and new approaches to the roles of investigators and respondents. Although informants proved to be necessary and valuable, community researchers should be alert to cognitive biases, including the false consensus bias, personal validation, and the self‐serving bias, that may lead informants to provide inaccurate information. This project also demonstrates the importance of studying behavior in context and how methodology from psychology may be used to enhance field studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987589814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987589814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/1520-6629(199301)21:1<35::AID-JCOP2290210105>3.0.CO;2-Y

DO - 10.1002/1520-6629(199301)21:1<35::AID-JCOP2290210105>3.0.CO;2-Y

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 35

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Community Psychology

JF - Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0090-4392

IS - 1

ER -