Physicians' Preparedness for Bioterrorism and Other Public Health Priorities

G. Caleb Alexander, G. Luke Larkin, Matthew K. Wynia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations


Objectives: Potential bioterrorism challenges policy makers to balance competing public health priorities. Earlier surveys showed low physician bioterrorism preparedness but did not assess physicians' general public health preparedness, compare the preparedness of emergency and primary care physicians, or assess temporal trends. Methods: This was a national, cross-sectional, random-sample survey conducted in 2003. Results: Overall, 744 of 1,200 eligible physicians responded (response rate, 62%). Of these, 58% of emergency physician respondents and 48% of primary care physician respondents reported having learned a lot about responding to bioterror since September 11, 2001 (p < 0.01). However, only 43% of emergency physicians and 21% of primary care physicians agreed they are generally "well prepared to play a role in responding to a bioterror attack" (p < 0.001). Beliefs about balancing public health priorities were similar among emergency and primary care respondents. Seventy-eight percent of respondents believed that local health care systems need to be prepared for bioterrorism, and 92% believed that local health care systems need to be prepared for natural epidemics. By contrast, only 23% and 46% of respondents reported that their local health care systems are well prepared for bioterrorism and natural epidemics, respectively. Meanwhile, 77% agreed that "influenza is a greater threat to public health than bioterrorism," and 21% reported that bioterrorism preparedness efforts are diverting resources from more important public health problems. Conclusions: In 2003, most emergency and primary care physicians reported that they and their local health care systems were not yet well prepared to respond to a bioterror attack, and many believed that more resources should go toward preparing for natural epidemics. These findings highlight the importance of expanding bioterrorism preparedness efforts to improve the public health system more broadly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1238-1241
Number of pages4
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes


  • bioterrorism
  • preparedness
  • public health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Physicians' Preparedness for Bioterrorism and Other Public Health Priorities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this