Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically III patients

A systematic review

Peter J. Pronovost, Derek C. Angus, Todd Dorman, Karen A Robinson, Tony T. Dremsizov, Tammy L. Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: Intensive care unit (ICU) physician staffing varies widely, and its association with patient outcomes remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association between ICU physician staffing and patient outcomes. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE (January 1, 1965, through September 30, 2001) for the following medical subject heading (MeSH) terms: intensive care units, ICU, health resources/utilization, hospitalization, medical staff, hospital organization and administration, personnel staffing and scheduling, length of stay, and LOS. We also used the following text words: staffing, intensivist, critical, care, and specialist. To identify observational studies, we added the MeSH terms case-control study and retrospective study. Although we searched for non-English-language citations, we reviewed only English-language articles. We also searched EMBASE, HealthStar (Health Services, Technology, Administration, and Research), and HSRPROJ (Health Services Research Projects in Progress) via Internet Grateful Med and The Cochrane Library and hand searched abstract proceedings from intensive care national scientific meetings (January 1, 1994, through December 31, 2001). Study Selection: We selected randomized and observational controlled trials of critically ill adults or children. Studies examined ICU attending physician staffing strategies and the outcomes of hospital and ICU mortality and length of stay (LOS). Studies were selected and critiqued by 2 reviewers. We reviewed 2590 abstracts and identified 26 relevant observational studies (of which 1 included 2 comparisons), resulting in 27 comparisons of alternative staffing strategies. Twenty studies focused on a single ICU. Data Synthesis: We grouped ICU physician staffing into low-intensity (no intensivist or elective intensivist consultation) or high-intensity (mandatory intensivist consultation or closed ICU [all care directed by intensivist]) groups. High-intensity staffing was associated with lower hospital mortality in 16 of 17 studies (94%) and with a pooled estimate of the relative risk for hospital mortality of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.82). High-intensity staffing was associated with a lower ICU mortality in 14 of 15 studies (93%) and with a pooled estimate of the relative risk for ICU mortality of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.75). High-intensity staffing reduced hospital LOS in 10 of 13 studies and reduced ICU LOS in 14 of 18 studies without case-mix adjustment. High-intensity staffing was associated with reduced hospital LOS in 2 of 4 studies and ICU LOS in both studies that adjusted for case mix. No study found increased LOS with high-intensity staffing after case-mix adjustment. Conclusions: High-intensity vs low-intensity ICU physician staffing is associated with reduced hospital and ICU mortality and hospital and ICU LOS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2151-2162
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume288
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 6 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intensive Care Units
Physicians
Length of Stay
Hospital Mortality
Medical Subject Headings
Risk Adjustment
Health Services Research
Critical Care
Grateful Med
Observational Studies
Mortality
Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
Language
Referral and Consultation
Health Services Administration
Confidence Intervals
Hospital Administration
Biomedical Technology
Health Resources
Information Storage and Retrieval

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically III patients : A systematic review. / Pronovost, Peter J.; Angus, Derek C.; Dorman, Todd; Robinson, Karen A; Dremsizov, Tony T.; Young, Tammy L.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 288, No. 17, 06.11.2002, p. 2151-2162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pronovost, Peter J. ; Angus, Derek C. ; Dorman, Todd ; Robinson, Karen A ; Dremsizov, Tony T. ; Young, Tammy L. / Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically III patients : A systematic review. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002 ; Vol. 288, No. 17. pp. 2151-2162.
@article{b9295ecd89d449d4a7dd5b25fb6571d3,
title = "Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically III patients: A systematic review",
abstract = "Context: Intensive care unit (ICU) physician staffing varies widely, and its association with patient outcomes remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association between ICU physician staffing and patient outcomes. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE (January 1, 1965, through September 30, 2001) for the following medical subject heading (MeSH) terms: intensive care units, ICU, health resources/utilization, hospitalization, medical staff, hospital organization and administration, personnel staffing and scheduling, length of stay, and LOS. We also used the following text words: staffing, intensivist, critical, care, and specialist. To identify observational studies, we added the MeSH terms case-control study and retrospective study. Although we searched for non-English-language citations, we reviewed only English-language articles. We also searched EMBASE, HealthStar (Health Services, Technology, Administration, and Research), and HSRPROJ (Health Services Research Projects in Progress) via Internet Grateful Med and The Cochrane Library and hand searched abstract proceedings from intensive care national scientific meetings (January 1, 1994, through December 31, 2001). Study Selection: We selected randomized and observational controlled trials of critically ill adults or children. Studies examined ICU attending physician staffing strategies and the outcomes of hospital and ICU mortality and length of stay (LOS). Studies were selected and critiqued by 2 reviewers. We reviewed 2590 abstracts and identified 26 relevant observational studies (of which 1 included 2 comparisons), resulting in 27 comparisons of alternative staffing strategies. Twenty studies focused on a single ICU. Data Synthesis: We grouped ICU physician staffing into low-intensity (no intensivist or elective intensivist consultation) or high-intensity (mandatory intensivist consultation or closed ICU [all care directed by intensivist]) groups. High-intensity staffing was associated with lower hospital mortality in 16 of 17 studies (94{\%}) and with a pooled estimate of the relative risk for hospital mortality of 0.71 (95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.82). High-intensity staffing was associated with a lower ICU mortality in 14 of 15 studies (93{\%}) and with a pooled estimate of the relative risk for ICU mortality of 0.61 (95{\%} CI, 0.50-0.75). High-intensity staffing reduced hospital LOS in 10 of 13 studies and reduced ICU LOS in 14 of 18 studies without case-mix adjustment. High-intensity staffing was associated with reduced hospital LOS in 2 of 4 studies and ICU LOS in both studies that adjusted for case mix. No study found increased LOS with high-intensity staffing after case-mix adjustment. Conclusions: High-intensity vs low-intensity ICU physician staffing is associated with reduced hospital and ICU mortality and hospital and ICU LOS.",
author = "Pronovost, {Peter J.} and Angus, {Derek C.} and Todd Dorman and Robinson, {Karen A} and Dremsizov, {Tony T.} and Young, {Tammy L.}",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1001/jama.288.17.2151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "288",
pages = "2151--2162",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0098-7484",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically III patients

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

AU - Angus, Derek C.

AU - Dorman, Todd

AU - Robinson, Karen A

AU - Dremsizov, Tony T.

AU - Young, Tammy L.

PY - 2002/11/6

Y1 - 2002/11/6

N2 - Context: Intensive care unit (ICU) physician staffing varies widely, and its association with patient outcomes remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association between ICU physician staffing and patient outcomes. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE (January 1, 1965, through September 30, 2001) for the following medical subject heading (MeSH) terms: intensive care units, ICU, health resources/utilization, hospitalization, medical staff, hospital organization and administration, personnel staffing and scheduling, length of stay, and LOS. We also used the following text words: staffing, intensivist, critical, care, and specialist. To identify observational studies, we added the MeSH terms case-control study and retrospective study. Although we searched for non-English-language citations, we reviewed only English-language articles. We also searched EMBASE, HealthStar (Health Services, Technology, Administration, and Research), and HSRPROJ (Health Services Research Projects in Progress) via Internet Grateful Med and The Cochrane Library and hand searched abstract proceedings from intensive care national scientific meetings (January 1, 1994, through December 31, 2001). Study Selection: We selected randomized and observational controlled trials of critically ill adults or children. Studies examined ICU attending physician staffing strategies and the outcomes of hospital and ICU mortality and length of stay (LOS). Studies were selected and critiqued by 2 reviewers. We reviewed 2590 abstracts and identified 26 relevant observational studies (of which 1 included 2 comparisons), resulting in 27 comparisons of alternative staffing strategies. Twenty studies focused on a single ICU. Data Synthesis: We grouped ICU physician staffing into low-intensity (no intensivist or elective intensivist consultation) or high-intensity (mandatory intensivist consultation or closed ICU [all care directed by intensivist]) groups. High-intensity staffing was associated with lower hospital mortality in 16 of 17 studies (94%) and with a pooled estimate of the relative risk for hospital mortality of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.82). High-intensity staffing was associated with a lower ICU mortality in 14 of 15 studies (93%) and with a pooled estimate of the relative risk for ICU mortality of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.75). High-intensity staffing reduced hospital LOS in 10 of 13 studies and reduced ICU LOS in 14 of 18 studies without case-mix adjustment. High-intensity staffing was associated with reduced hospital LOS in 2 of 4 studies and ICU LOS in both studies that adjusted for case mix. No study found increased LOS with high-intensity staffing after case-mix adjustment. Conclusions: High-intensity vs low-intensity ICU physician staffing is associated with reduced hospital and ICU mortality and hospital and ICU LOS.

AB - Context: Intensive care unit (ICU) physician staffing varies widely, and its association with patient outcomes remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association between ICU physician staffing and patient outcomes. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE (January 1, 1965, through September 30, 2001) for the following medical subject heading (MeSH) terms: intensive care units, ICU, health resources/utilization, hospitalization, medical staff, hospital organization and administration, personnel staffing and scheduling, length of stay, and LOS. We also used the following text words: staffing, intensivist, critical, care, and specialist. To identify observational studies, we added the MeSH terms case-control study and retrospective study. Although we searched for non-English-language citations, we reviewed only English-language articles. We also searched EMBASE, HealthStar (Health Services, Technology, Administration, and Research), and HSRPROJ (Health Services Research Projects in Progress) via Internet Grateful Med and The Cochrane Library and hand searched abstract proceedings from intensive care national scientific meetings (January 1, 1994, through December 31, 2001). Study Selection: We selected randomized and observational controlled trials of critically ill adults or children. Studies examined ICU attending physician staffing strategies and the outcomes of hospital and ICU mortality and length of stay (LOS). Studies were selected and critiqued by 2 reviewers. We reviewed 2590 abstracts and identified 26 relevant observational studies (of which 1 included 2 comparisons), resulting in 27 comparisons of alternative staffing strategies. Twenty studies focused on a single ICU. Data Synthesis: We grouped ICU physician staffing into low-intensity (no intensivist or elective intensivist consultation) or high-intensity (mandatory intensivist consultation or closed ICU [all care directed by intensivist]) groups. High-intensity staffing was associated with lower hospital mortality in 16 of 17 studies (94%) and with a pooled estimate of the relative risk for hospital mortality of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.82). High-intensity staffing was associated with a lower ICU mortality in 14 of 15 studies (93%) and with a pooled estimate of the relative risk for ICU mortality of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50-0.75). High-intensity staffing reduced hospital LOS in 10 of 13 studies and reduced ICU LOS in 14 of 18 studies without case-mix adjustment. High-intensity staffing was associated with reduced hospital LOS in 2 of 4 studies and ICU LOS in both studies that adjusted for case mix. No study found increased LOS with high-intensity staffing after case-mix adjustment. Conclusions: High-intensity vs low-intensity ICU physician staffing is associated with reduced hospital and ICU mortality and hospital and ICU LOS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037032390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037032390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.288.17.2151

DO - 10.1001/jama.288.17.2151

M3 - Article

VL - 288

SP - 2151

EP - 2162

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0098-7484

IS - 17

ER -