Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy

Reena V. Chokshi, Christine E. Hovis, Graham A. Colditz, Dayna S. Early, Jean S. Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and Aims: It has been suggested that bowel preparation quality may influence decision-making about appropriate follow-up interval after screening colonoscopy. We sought: (1) to assess physician recommendations for timing of subsequent colonoscopy in average-risk patients with inadequate bowel preparation on initial screening, and (2) to measure the association between physician recommendations and patient adherence to repeat colonoscopy. Methods: Patients undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy from 2004 to 2009 found to have inadequate bowel preparation were identified. Physician recommendations for timing of subsequent colonoscopy and patient adherence to repeat colonoscopy were assessed through examination of endoscopy records. Data from repeat colonoscopies were collected through August 2010. Results: There were 373 patients with inadequate bowel preparation on initial screening colonoscopy. There was a wide range of physician recommendations for timing of repeat colonoscopy: next day (4.6 % of patients), 2 days to 6 months (9.9 %), 7 months to 1 year (34.0 %), 2-5 years (38.3 %), 6-10 years (5.1 %), and timing not specified (8.0 %). Physicians were significantly more likely to recommend repeat colonoscopy within 1 year if any polyps were detected (OR = 2.2, p = 0.001). Patients instructed to have next day follow-up were significantly more likely to adhere to the recommendation compared to patients who were instructed to return after longer intervals (OR 4.4, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy were subject to a wide range of physician recommendations for follow-up. Patient adherence to physician recommendations was significantly higher when repeat colonoscopy was recommended the next day.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2151-2155
Number of pages5
JournalDigestive Diseases and Sciences
Volume58
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Patient Compliance
Physicians
Polyps
Endoscopy
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Bowel preparation
  • Colonoscopy
  • Colorectal cancer screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Physiology

Cite this

Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. / Chokshi, Reena V.; Hovis, Christine E.; Colditz, Graham A.; Early, Dayna S.; Wang, Jean S.

In: Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Vol. 58, No. 8, 08.2013, p. 2151-2155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chokshi, Reena V. ; Hovis, Christine E. ; Colditz, Graham A. ; Early, Dayna S. ; Wang, Jean S. / Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. In: Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2013 ; Vol. 58, No. 8. pp. 2151-2155.
@article{58fc498b77eb4759b8ee0735ed1e5405,
title = "Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy",
abstract = "Background and Aims: It has been suggested that bowel preparation quality may influence decision-making about appropriate follow-up interval after screening colonoscopy. We sought: (1) to assess physician recommendations for timing of subsequent colonoscopy in average-risk patients with inadequate bowel preparation on initial screening, and (2) to measure the association between physician recommendations and patient adherence to repeat colonoscopy. Methods: Patients undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy from 2004 to 2009 found to have inadequate bowel preparation were identified. Physician recommendations for timing of subsequent colonoscopy and patient adherence to repeat colonoscopy were assessed through examination of endoscopy records. Data from repeat colonoscopies were collected through August 2010. Results: There were 373 patients with inadequate bowel preparation on initial screening colonoscopy. There was a wide range of physician recommendations for timing of repeat colonoscopy: next day (4.6 {\%} of patients), 2 days to 6 months (9.9 {\%}), 7 months to 1 year (34.0 {\%}), 2-5 years (38.3 {\%}), 6-10 years (5.1 {\%}), and timing not specified (8.0 {\%}). Physicians were significantly more likely to recommend repeat colonoscopy within 1 year if any polyps were detected (OR = 2.2, p = 0.001). Patients instructed to have next day follow-up were significantly more likely to adhere to the recommendation compared to patients who were instructed to return after longer intervals (OR 4.4, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy were subject to a wide range of physician recommendations for follow-up. Patient adherence to physician recommendations was significantly higher when repeat colonoscopy was recommended the next day.",
keywords = "Adherence, Bowel preparation, Colonoscopy, Colorectal cancer screening",
author = "Chokshi, {Reena V.} and Hovis, {Christine E.} and Colditz, {Graham A.} and Early, {Dayna S.} and Wang, {Jean S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s10620-013-2642-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "2151--2155",
journal = "Digestive Diseases and Sciences",
issn = "0163-2116",
publisher = "Plenum Publishers",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy

AU - Chokshi, Reena V.

AU - Hovis, Christine E.

AU - Colditz, Graham A.

AU - Early, Dayna S.

AU - Wang, Jean S.

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Background and Aims: It has been suggested that bowel preparation quality may influence decision-making about appropriate follow-up interval after screening colonoscopy. We sought: (1) to assess physician recommendations for timing of subsequent colonoscopy in average-risk patients with inadequate bowel preparation on initial screening, and (2) to measure the association between physician recommendations and patient adherence to repeat colonoscopy. Methods: Patients undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy from 2004 to 2009 found to have inadequate bowel preparation were identified. Physician recommendations for timing of subsequent colonoscopy and patient adherence to repeat colonoscopy were assessed through examination of endoscopy records. Data from repeat colonoscopies were collected through August 2010. Results: There were 373 patients with inadequate bowel preparation on initial screening colonoscopy. There was a wide range of physician recommendations for timing of repeat colonoscopy: next day (4.6 % of patients), 2 days to 6 months (9.9 %), 7 months to 1 year (34.0 %), 2-5 years (38.3 %), 6-10 years (5.1 %), and timing not specified (8.0 %). Physicians were significantly more likely to recommend repeat colonoscopy within 1 year if any polyps were detected (OR = 2.2, p = 0.001). Patients instructed to have next day follow-up were significantly more likely to adhere to the recommendation compared to patients who were instructed to return after longer intervals (OR 4.4, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy were subject to a wide range of physician recommendations for follow-up. Patient adherence to physician recommendations was significantly higher when repeat colonoscopy was recommended the next day.

AB - Background and Aims: It has been suggested that bowel preparation quality may influence decision-making about appropriate follow-up interval after screening colonoscopy. We sought: (1) to assess physician recommendations for timing of subsequent colonoscopy in average-risk patients with inadequate bowel preparation on initial screening, and (2) to measure the association between physician recommendations and patient adherence to repeat colonoscopy. Methods: Patients undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy from 2004 to 2009 found to have inadequate bowel preparation were identified. Physician recommendations for timing of subsequent colonoscopy and patient adherence to repeat colonoscopy were assessed through examination of endoscopy records. Data from repeat colonoscopies were collected through August 2010. Results: There were 373 patients with inadequate bowel preparation on initial screening colonoscopy. There was a wide range of physician recommendations for timing of repeat colonoscopy: next day (4.6 % of patients), 2 days to 6 months (9.9 %), 7 months to 1 year (34.0 %), 2-5 years (38.3 %), 6-10 years (5.1 %), and timing not specified (8.0 %). Physicians were significantly more likely to recommend repeat colonoscopy within 1 year if any polyps were detected (OR = 2.2, p = 0.001). Patients instructed to have next day follow-up were significantly more likely to adhere to the recommendation compared to patients who were instructed to return after longer intervals (OR 4.4, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy were subject to a wide range of physician recommendations for follow-up. Patient adherence to physician recommendations was significantly higher when repeat colonoscopy was recommended the next day.

KW - Adherence

KW - Bowel preparation

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Colorectal cancer screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881480570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881480570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10620-013-2642-9

DO - 10.1007/s10620-013-2642-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 23535876

AN - SCOPUS:84881480570

VL - 58

SP - 2151

EP - 2155

JO - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

JF - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

SN - 0163-2116

IS - 8

ER -