Physical disability in older adults

A physiological approach

Linda P Fried, Walter H. Ettinger, Bonnie Lind, Anne B. Newman, Julius Gardin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Measures of physical function have been developed primarily to assess health status, prognosis, and service needs. They are now, increasingly, being used as outcome measures in studies seeking to determine the causes of disability. However, the extent to which these standardized measures, as they currently are constituted, are meaningful for the evaluation of underlying pathophysiology is not defined. To assess evidence for an etiologic rationale for these measures, we evaluated self-report of difficulty in physical function in the Cardiovascular Health Study, a study of 5201 men and women 65 years and older in four U.S. communities. We determined (by factor analysis) that self-reported difficulty with each of 17 tasks of daily life aggregates in four groups; i.e. difficulty in one task is associated with having difficulty in the other tasks in the group. These groups include (1) activities primarily dependent on mobility and exercise tolerance; (2) complex activities heavily dependent on cognition and sensory input; (3) selected basic self-care activities; and (4) upper extremity activities. Groups 2 and 3 are similar, but not identical, to Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and Activities of Daily Living (ADL), respectively. We then tested whether these groupings were associated with different underlying impairments. Multiple logistic regression analyses indicate that there are constellations of physiologic and disease characteristics significantly (p <0.01) associated with difficulty in each of these four groups of activities, among 15 chronic diseases and conditions ascertained. Some diseases are uniquely associated with difficulty in one group of tasks; some overlap, and are associated with 2, 3 or 4 groups of tasks. The associations found with difficulty in performing tasks in groups 2 and 3 were frequently stronger than those with the larger groups of ADL or IADL tasks, suggesting increased specificity of associations found with these new groupings. These results suggest that re-grouping of tasks of daily life may provide a more refined physiologically-based outcome measure for use in evaluating causes of disability. The ability to define risk factors for disability may be enhanced by choosing outcome measures with a demonstrated physiologic rationale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)747-760
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume47
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Activities of Daily Living
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Aptitude
Exercise Tolerance
Self Care
Upper Extremity
Self Report
Cognition
Health Status
Statistical Factor Analysis
Health Services
Chronic Disease
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Health

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Disability
  • Epidemiology
  • Geriatrics
  • Outcome assessment
  • Risk factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Physical disability in older adults : A physiological approach. / Fried, Linda P; Ettinger, Walter H.; Lind, Bonnie; Newman, Anne B.; Gardin, Julius.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 47, No. 7, 1994, p. 747-760.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fried, Linda P ; Ettinger, Walter H. ; Lind, Bonnie ; Newman, Anne B. ; Gardin, Julius. / Physical disability in older adults : A physiological approach. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1994 ; Vol. 47, No. 7. pp. 747-760.
@article{3a52962d15964876a7a7fbe67db177ae,
title = "Physical disability in older adults: A physiological approach",
abstract = "Measures of physical function have been developed primarily to assess health status, prognosis, and service needs. They are now, increasingly, being used as outcome measures in studies seeking to determine the causes of disability. However, the extent to which these standardized measures, as they currently are constituted, are meaningful for the evaluation of underlying pathophysiology is not defined. To assess evidence for an etiologic rationale for these measures, we evaluated self-report of difficulty in physical function in the Cardiovascular Health Study, a study of 5201 men and women 65 years and older in four U.S. communities. We determined (by factor analysis) that self-reported difficulty with each of 17 tasks of daily life aggregates in four groups; i.e. difficulty in one task is associated with having difficulty in the other tasks in the group. These groups include (1) activities primarily dependent on mobility and exercise tolerance; (2) complex activities heavily dependent on cognition and sensory input; (3) selected basic self-care activities; and (4) upper extremity activities. Groups 2 and 3 are similar, but not identical, to Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and Activities of Daily Living (ADL), respectively. We then tested whether these groupings were associated with different underlying impairments. Multiple logistic regression analyses indicate that there are constellations of physiologic and disease characteristics significantly (p <0.01) associated with difficulty in each of these four groups of activities, among 15 chronic diseases and conditions ascertained. Some diseases are uniquely associated with difficulty in one group of tasks; some overlap, and are associated with 2, 3 or 4 groups of tasks. The associations found with difficulty in performing tasks in groups 2 and 3 were frequently stronger than those with the larger groups of ADL or IADL tasks, suggesting increased specificity of associations found with these new groupings. These results suggest that re-grouping of tasks of daily life may provide a more refined physiologically-based outcome measure for use in evaluating causes of disability. The ability to define risk factors for disability may be enhanced by choosing outcome measures with a demonstrated physiologic rationale.",
keywords = "Aged, Disability, Epidemiology, Geriatrics, Outcome assessment, Risk factors",
author = "Fried, {Linda P} and Ettinger, {Walter H.} and Bonnie Lind and Newman, {Anne B.} and Julius Gardin",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/0895-4356(94)90172-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "747--760",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physical disability in older adults

T2 - A physiological approach

AU - Fried, Linda P

AU - Ettinger, Walter H.

AU - Lind, Bonnie

AU - Newman, Anne B.

AU - Gardin, Julius

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Measures of physical function have been developed primarily to assess health status, prognosis, and service needs. They are now, increasingly, being used as outcome measures in studies seeking to determine the causes of disability. However, the extent to which these standardized measures, as they currently are constituted, are meaningful for the evaluation of underlying pathophysiology is not defined. To assess evidence for an etiologic rationale for these measures, we evaluated self-report of difficulty in physical function in the Cardiovascular Health Study, a study of 5201 men and women 65 years and older in four U.S. communities. We determined (by factor analysis) that self-reported difficulty with each of 17 tasks of daily life aggregates in four groups; i.e. difficulty in one task is associated with having difficulty in the other tasks in the group. These groups include (1) activities primarily dependent on mobility and exercise tolerance; (2) complex activities heavily dependent on cognition and sensory input; (3) selected basic self-care activities; and (4) upper extremity activities. Groups 2 and 3 are similar, but not identical, to Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and Activities of Daily Living (ADL), respectively. We then tested whether these groupings were associated with different underlying impairments. Multiple logistic regression analyses indicate that there are constellations of physiologic and disease characteristics significantly (p <0.01) associated with difficulty in each of these four groups of activities, among 15 chronic diseases and conditions ascertained. Some diseases are uniquely associated with difficulty in one group of tasks; some overlap, and are associated with 2, 3 or 4 groups of tasks. The associations found with difficulty in performing tasks in groups 2 and 3 were frequently stronger than those with the larger groups of ADL or IADL tasks, suggesting increased specificity of associations found with these new groupings. These results suggest that re-grouping of tasks of daily life may provide a more refined physiologically-based outcome measure for use in evaluating causes of disability. The ability to define risk factors for disability may be enhanced by choosing outcome measures with a demonstrated physiologic rationale.

AB - Measures of physical function have been developed primarily to assess health status, prognosis, and service needs. They are now, increasingly, being used as outcome measures in studies seeking to determine the causes of disability. However, the extent to which these standardized measures, as they currently are constituted, are meaningful for the evaluation of underlying pathophysiology is not defined. To assess evidence for an etiologic rationale for these measures, we evaluated self-report of difficulty in physical function in the Cardiovascular Health Study, a study of 5201 men and women 65 years and older in four U.S. communities. We determined (by factor analysis) that self-reported difficulty with each of 17 tasks of daily life aggregates in four groups; i.e. difficulty in one task is associated with having difficulty in the other tasks in the group. These groups include (1) activities primarily dependent on mobility and exercise tolerance; (2) complex activities heavily dependent on cognition and sensory input; (3) selected basic self-care activities; and (4) upper extremity activities. Groups 2 and 3 are similar, but not identical, to Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and Activities of Daily Living (ADL), respectively. We then tested whether these groupings were associated with different underlying impairments. Multiple logistic regression analyses indicate that there are constellations of physiologic and disease characteristics significantly (p <0.01) associated with difficulty in each of these four groups of activities, among 15 chronic diseases and conditions ascertained. Some diseases are uniquely associated with difficulty in one group of tasks; some overlap, and are associated with 2, 3 or 4 groups of tasks. The associations found with difficulty in performing tasks in groups 2 and 3 were frequently stronger than those with the larger groups of ADL or IADL tasks, suggesting increased specificity of associations found with these new groupings. These results suggest that re-grouping of tasks of daily life may provide a more refined physiologically-based outcome measure for use in evaluating causes of disability. The ability to define risk factors for disability may be enhanced by choosing outcome measures with a demonstrated physiologic rationale.

KW - Aged

KW - Disability

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Geriatrics

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Risk factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027982061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027982061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90172-4

DO - 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90172-4

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 747

EP - 760

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 7

ER -