Physical abilities and mobility scale: Reliability and validity in children receiving inpatient rehabilitation for acquired brain injury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Physical Abilities and Mobility Scale (PAMS) in children receiving inpatient rehabilitation for acquired brain injury (ABI). Design: Admission and discharge PAMS item and total scores were evaluated. The WeeFIM was used as the criterion standard. A case study was used to illustrate the complementary nature of the PAMS and WeeFIM. Setting: A single, free-standing, academically affiliated pediatric rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Children (N=107) aged 2 through 18 years receiving inpatient rehabilitation for ABI between March 2009 and March 2012. Forty-two additional children treated during this time were excluded because of missing PAMS data. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach alpha. Interrater reliability was evaluated through overall agreement, Pearson correlations, and intraclass correlations. Construct validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis. Criterion validity was explored through correlations of PAMS overall and factor scores with WeeFIM total and subscale scores. Sensitivity to recovery was examined using paired t tests, examining differences between admission and discharge scores for each item and for the total score. Results: Internal consistency and interrater reliability were high. Factor analysis revealed 2 factors: lower-level skills and higher-level mobility skills. Correlations with the WeeFIM ranged from moderate to very strong; total PAMS score most strongly correlated with the WeeFIM mobility subscore. Total PAMS score and each item score significantly increased between admission and discharge. Conclusions: The PAMS is a reliable and valid measure of progress during inpatient rehabilitation for children with ABI. By capturing fine-grain progress toward both lower-level and higher-level mobility skills, the PAMS complements the WeeFIM in assessing functional gains during the rehabilitation stay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1335-1341
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume94
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Brain Injuries
Inpatients
Rehabilitation
Statistical Factor Analysis
Pediatric Hospitals
Psychometrics
Cereals
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Brain injuries
  • Child
  • Motor skills
  • Outcomes assessment
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{ec3292e470ed4f8e8d9703ab0c4de656,
title = "Physical abilities and mobility scale: Reliability and validity in children receiving inpatient rehabilitation for acquired brain injury",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Physical Abilities and Mobility Scale (PAMS) in children receiving inpatient rehabilitation for acquired brain injury (ABI). Design: Admission and discharge PAMS item and total scores were evaluated. The WeeFIM was used as the criterion standard. A case study was used to illustrate the complementary nature of the PAMS and WeeFIM. Setting: A single, free-standing, academically affiliated pediatric rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Children (N=107) aged 2 through 18 years receiving inpatient rehabilitation for ABI between March 2009 and March 2012. Forty-two additional children treated during this time were excluded because of missing PAMS data. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach alpha. Interrater reliability was evaluated through overall agreement, Pearson correlations, and intraclass correlations. Construct validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis. Criterion validity was explored through correlations of PAMS overall and factor scores with WeeFIM total and subscale scores. Sensitivity to recovery was examined using paired t tests, examining differences between admission and discharge scores for each item and for the total score. Results: Internal consistency and interrater reliability were high. Factor analysis revealed 2 factors: lower-level skills and higher-level mobility skills. Correlations with the WeeFIM ranged from moderate to very strong; total PAMS score most strongly correlated with the WeeFIM mobility subscore. Total PAMS score and each item score significantly increased between admission and discharge. Conclusions: The PAMS is a reliable and valid measure of progress during inpatient rehabilitation for children with ABI. By capturing fine-grain progress toward both lower-level and higher-level mobility skills, the PAMS complements the WeeFIM in assessing functional gains during the rehabilitation stay.",
keywords = "Brain injuries, Child, Motor skills, Outcomes assessment, Rehabilitation",
author = "Trovato, {Melissa K.} and Elena Bradley and Slomine, {Beth S.} and Salorio, {Cynthia F.} and Christensen, {James R.} and Suskauer, {Stacy J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.004",
volume = "94",
pages = "1335--1341",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physical abilities and mobility scale

T2 - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

AU - Trovato,Melissa K.

AU - Bradley,Elena

AU - Slomine,Beth S.

AU - Salorio,Cynthia F.

AU - Christensen,James R.

AU - Suskauer,Stacy J.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Objective: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Physical Abilities and Mobility Scale (PAMS) in children receiving inpatient rehabilitation for acquired brain injury (ABI). Design: Admission and discharge PAMS item and total scores were evaluated. The WeeFIM was used as the criterion standard. A case study was used to illustrate the complementary nature of the PAMS and WeeFIM. Setting: A single, free-standing, academically affiliated pediatric rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Children (N=107) aged 2 through 18 years receiving inpatient rehabilitation for ABI between March 2009 and March 2012. Forty-two additional children treated during this time were excluded because of missing PAMS data. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach alpha. Interrater reliability was evaluated through overall agreement, Pearson correlations, and intraclass correlations. Construct validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis. Criterion validity was explored through correlations of PAMS overall and factor scores with WeeFIM total and subscale scores. Sensitivity to recovery was examined using paired t tests, examining differences between admission and discharge scores for each item and for the total score. Results: Internal consistency and interrater reliability were high. Factor analysis revealed 2 factors: lower-level skills and higher-level mobility skills. Correlations with the WeeFIM ranged from moderate to very strong; total PAMS score most strongly correlated with the WeeFIM mobility subscore. Total PAMS score and each item score significantly increased between admission and discharge. Conclusions: The PAMS is a reliable and valid measure of progress during inpatient rehabilitation for children with ABI. By capturing fine-grain progress toward both lower-level and higher-level mobility skills, the PAMS complements the WeeFIM in assessing functional gains during the rehabilitation stay.

AB - Objective: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Physical Abilities and Mobility Scale (PAMS) in children receiving inpatient rehabilitation for acquired brain injury (ABI). Design: Admission and discharge PAMS item and total scores were evaluated. The WeeFIM was used as the criterion standard. A case study was used to illustrate the complementary nature of the PAMS and WeeFIM. Setting: A single, free-standing, academically affiliated pediatric rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Children (N=107) aged 2 through 18 years receiving inpatient rehabilitation for ABI between March 2009 and March 2012. Forty-two additional children treated during this time were excluded because of missing PAMS data. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach alpha. Interrater reliability was evaluated through overall agreement, Pearson correlations, and intraclass correlations. Construct validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis. Criterion validity was explored through correlations of PAMS overall and factor scores with WeeFIM total and subscale scores. Sensitivity to recovery was examined using paired t tests, examining differences between admission and discharge scores for each item and for the total score. Results: Internal consistency and interrater reliability were high. Factor analysis revealed 2 factors: lower-level skills and higher-level mobility skills. Correlations with the WeeFIM ranged from moderate to very strong; total PAMS score most strongly correlated with the WeeFIM mobility subscore. Total PAMS score and each item score significantly increased between admission and discharge. Conclusions: The PAMS is a reliable and valid measure of progress during inpatient rehabilitation for children with ABI. By capturing fine-grain progress toward both lower-level and higher-level mobility skills, the PAMS complements the WeeFIM in assessing functional gains during the rehabilitation stay.

KW - Brain injuries

KW - Child

KW - Motor skills

KW - Outcomes assessment

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879502158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879502158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.004

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 1335

EP - 1341

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 7

ER -