Phase II trial of 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine versus aclacinomycin-A in advanced sarcomas and mesotheliomas

Robert H. Earhart, David J. Amato, Alex Yuang-Chi Chang, Ernest C. Borden, Masanori Shiraki, Melissa E. Dowd, Robert L. Comis, Thomas E. Davis, Thomas J. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ninety-eight patients with previously-treated advanced soft tissue sarcoma, bone sarcoma, or mesothelioma were randomly assigned to one of two intravenous single-agent treatment regimens, either 6-diazo-5-oxo-l-norleucine (DON; brief infusions of 50 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks) or aclacinomycinA (ACM-A, as 30-min infusions of 100 mg/m2 or 85 mg/m2, administered every 3 weeks). Of 43 patients who were evaluable for response, survival and toxicity, there were two responses (5%) produced by ACM-A; one in a male with mesothelioma, and one in a female with malignant fibrous histiocytoma. None of the 36 evaluable patients treated with DON developed an objective tumor response. Median survival was 4.8 months in the DON treatment arm, and 6.8 months in the ACM-A treatment arm. No patients on the DON arm experienced lethal or life-threatening toxicities, and severe toxicities resulting from this treatment included nausea and emesis (10%), stomatitis (2%), gastrointestinal toxicity (2%), and anemia (2%). Moderate toxicities included vomiting (24%), hematologic toxicity (24%), neurologic toxicity (7%), diarrhea (7%), mucositis (5%), fever (5%), palpitations (2%), hepatotoxicity (2%), bleeding (2%) and edema (2%). Fifteen percent experienced at least one severe reaction, and 63% experienced at least one moderate or greater toxicity. ACM-A was associated with four cases of life-threatening myelosuppression (7%); severe toxicities included myelosuppression (11%), neurologic toxicity (4%), diarrhea (2%), respiratory toxicity (2%), pain and muscle spasms (2%), edema (2%), and ulceration following extravasation (2%). Moderate toxicities included diarrhea (9%), mucositis (7%), hepatotoxicity (7%), infection (5%), fever (7%), gastrointestinal toxicity (4%), respiratory (2%), dehydration (2%), cardiac (2%), alopecia (2%), ulceration following extravasation (7%), and edema (2%). Thirty-eight percent of patients on the ACM-A arm developed one or more severe or worse toxicity, and 76% had at least one moderate or worse toxicity. Neither regimen produces useful clinical results in patients with advanced sarcomas or mesotheliomas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-119
Number of pages7
JournalInvestigational New Drugs
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1990
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine
  • aclacinomycin-A
  • mesothelioma
  • phase II
  • sarcoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase II trial of 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine versus aclacinomycin-A in advanced sarcomas and mesotheliomas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this