TY - JOUR
T1 - Pharmaceutical industry support of US patient advocacy organizations
T2 - An international context
AU - Kang, So Yeon
AU - Bai, Ge
AU - Karas, Laura
AU - Anderson, Gerard F.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Public Health Association Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Objectives: To examine whether the share of pharmaceutical industry funds allocated to patient advocacy organizations (PAOs) is disproportionately large in the United States relative to other industrialized countries and to compare pharmaceutical companies' disclosure practices across industrialized countries. Methods: We examined funding of PAOs among the 10 largest pharmaceutical companies in 2016. We compared funding allocated to organizations across 8 large industrialized countries and pharmaceutical companies' disclosure practicesin each country. Results: Only 6 of the 10 largest pharmaceutical companies disclosed their financial transactions with PAOs in the United States. All 10 companies disclosed transactions in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, with varying levels of disclosure in other countries. In 2016, the 6 companies that disclosed transactions in the United States allocated 74% of their patient advocacy funding ($88 million) in the United States. Conclusions: The disproportionate funding of US PAOs in the absence of any disclosure requirements suggests that the United States should consider adoption of regulatory actions to enhance the transparency of relationships between the pharmaceutical industry and PAOs, and to ensure the integrity of public health decision-making.
AB - Objectives: To examine whether the share of pharmaceutical industry funds allocated to patient advocacy organizations (PAOs) is disproportionately large in the United States relative to other industrialized countries and to compare pharmaceutical companies' disclosure practices across industrialized countries. Methods: We examined funding of PAOs among the 10 largest pharmaceutical companies in 2016. We compared funding allocated to organizations across 8 large industrialized countries and pharmaceutical companies' disclosure practicesin each country. Results: Only 6 of the 10 largest pharmaceutical companies disclosed their financial transactions with PAOs in the United States. All 10 companies disclosed transactions in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, with varying levels of disclosure in other countries. In 2016, the 6 companies that disclosed transactions in the United States allocated 74% of their patient advocacy funding ($88 million) in the United States. Conclusions: The disproportionate funding of US PAOs in the absence of any disclosure requirements suggests that the United States should consider adoption of regulatory actions to enhance the transparency of relationships between the pharmaceutical industry and PAOs, and to ensure the integrity of public health decision-making.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062875654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062875654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304946
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304946
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30789768
AN - SCOPUS:85062875654
VL - 109
SP - 559
EP - 561
JO - American Journal of Public Health
JF - American Journal of Public Health
SN - 0090-0036
IS - 4
ER -