Personal Genetic Information about HIV

Research Participants' Views of Ethical, Social, and Behavioral Implications

Angie Boyce, Alexis Walker, Priya Duggal, Chloe L Thio, Gail Geller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Personal genetic information (PGI) about HIV is produced in research and entering the clinic and direct-to-consumer market, but little consideration has been given to ethical and social issues, public perspectives, and potential behavioral implications. Objectives: This research queried the views of research participants at risk for or infected with HIV, exploring their perspectives on HIV-related PGI and its ethical, social, and behavioral implications. Methods: We used focus groups to collect rich information about participants' perspectives on the ethical, social, and behavioral implications of PGI about HIV and host genetic research. We evaluated their reactions to three different types of genetic variants: Those that made them more susceptible to HIV, more protected from or resistant to HIV, or more likely to transmit HIV to others. Results: Overall, participants wanted PGI about HIV. Their reasons included a mix of personal or family health benefit and benefit to others, which varied in emphasis depending on variant type. While susceptibility variant information was seen primarily in terms of personal or family health benefit, for transmissibility and protective variant information, benefit to others emerged as a major reason for wanting PGI about HIV. Participants thought transmissibility variant information would help them prevent others from becoming infected, and protective variant information would allow them to volunteer for targeted research to help treat, cure, or prevent HIV. Possible harms were raised regarding the tendencies among some individuals to increase risky behavior with modulations in perceived risk. Potential behavioral implications were seen as significant, though complex, reflecting multifaceted risk perceptions. Conclusions: Our study adds to the evidence that participants in genetic research, across disease type, have a strong desire for PGI. For participants in research on the genetics of HIV, and potentially other infectious diseases, their desire for PGI is grounded in a perceived duty not to infect others, where they feel a moral responsibility regarding research participation and behavior change. Wider dissemination of HIV-related PGI may well increase research participation, but could have mixed effects on risk behavior. More research is needed on the implications of different variant types of PGI beyond susceptibility factors, especially protective variants or resistance factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPublic Health Genomics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Genetic Privacy
HIV
Research
Genetic Research
Family Health
Insurance Benefits
R Factors

Keywords

  • behavior
  • ethics
  • HIV
  • Personal genetic information
  • risk perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

@article{e7f52d03e73d40bbbab2e0122bfc2803,
title = "Personal Genetic Information about HIV: Research Participants' Views of Ethical, Social, and Behavioral Implications",
abstract = "Background: Personal genetic information (PGI) about HIV is produced in research and entering the clinic and direct-to-consumer market, but little consideration has been given to ethical and social issues, public perspectives, and potential behavioral implications. Objectives: This research queried the views of research participants at risk for or infected with HIV, exploring their perspectives on HIV-related PGI and its ethical, social, and behavioral implications. Methods: We used focus groups to collect rich information about participants' perspectives on the ethical, social, and behavioral implications of PGI about HIV and host genetic research. We evaluated their reactions to three different types of genetic variants: Those that made them more susceptible to HIV, more protected from or resistant to HIV, or more likely to transmit HIV to others. Results: Overall, participants wanted PGI about HIV. Their reasons included a mix of personal or family health benefit and benefit to others, which varied in emphasis depending on variant type. While susceptibility variant information was seen primarily in terms of personal or family health benefit, for transmissibility and protective variant information, benefit to others emerged as a major reason for wanting PGI about HIV. Participants thought transmissibility variant information would help them prevent others from becoming infected, and protective variant information would allow them to volunteer for targeted research to help treat, cure, or prevent HIV. Possible harms were raised regarding the tendencies among some individuals to increase risky behavior with modulations in perceived risk. Potential behavioral implications were seen as significant, though complex, reflecting multifaceted risk perceptions. Conclusions: Our study adds to the evidence that participants in genetic research, across disease type, have a strong desire for PGI. For participants in research on the genetics of HIV, and potentially other infectious diseases, their desire for PGI is grounded in a perceived duty not to infect others, where they feel a moral responsibility regarding research participation and behavior change. Wider dissemination of HIV-related PGI may well increase research participation, but could have mixed effects on risk behavior. More research is needed on the implications of different variant types of PGI beyond susceptibility factors, especially protective variants or resistance factors.",
keywords = "behavior, ethics, HIV, Personal genetic information, risk perception",
author = "Angie Boyce and Alexis Walker and Priya Duggal and Thio, {Chloe L} and Gail Geller",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1159/000501672",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Public Health Genomics",
issn = "1662-4246",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Personal Genetic Information about HIV

T2 - Research Participants' Views of Ethical, Social, and Behavioral Implications

AU - Boyce, Angie

AU - Walker, Alexis

AU - Duggal, Priya

AU - Thio, Chloe L

AU - Geller, Gail

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Personal genetic information (PGI) about HIV is produced in research and entering the clinic and direct-to-consumer market, but little consideration has been given to ethical and social issues, public perspectives, and potential behavioral implications. Objectives: This research queried the views of research participants at risk for or infected with HIV, exploring their perspectives on HIV-related PGI and its ethical, social, and behavioral implications. Methods: We used focus groups to collect rich information about participants' perspectives on the ethical, social, and behavioral implications of PGI about HIV and host genetic research. We evaluated their reactions to three different types of genetic variants: Those that made them more susceptible to HIV, more protected from or resistant to HIV, or more likely to transmit HIV to others. Results: Overall, participants wanted PGI about HIV. Their reasons included a mix of personal or family health benefit and benefit to others, which varied in emphasis depending on variant type. While susceptibility variant information was seen primarily in terms of personal or family health benefit, for transmissibility and protective variant information, benefit to others emerged as a major reason for wanting PGI about HIV. Participants thought transmissibility variant information would help them prevent others from becoming infected, and protective variant information would allow them to volunteer for targeted research to help treat, cure, or prevent HIV. Possible harms were raised regarding the tendencies among some individuals to increase risky behavior with modulations in perceived risk. Potential behavioral implications were seen as significant, though complex, reflecting multifaceted risk perceptions. Conclusions: Our study adds to the evidence that participants in genetic research, across disease type, have a strong desire for PGI. For participants in research on the genetics of HIV, and potentially other infectious diseases, their desire for PGI is grounded in a perceived duty not to infect others, where they feel a moral responsibility regarding research participation and behavior change. Wider dissemination of HIV-related PGI may well increase research participation, but could have mixed effects on risk behavior. More research is needed on the implications of different variant types of PGI beyond susceptibility factors, especially protective variants or resistance factors.

AB - Background: Personal genetic information (PGI) about HIV is produced in research and entering the clinic and direct-to-consumer market, but little consideration has been given to ethical and social issues, public perspectives, and potential behavioral implications. Objectives: This research queried the views of research participants at risk for or infected with HIV, exploring their perspectives on HIV-related PGI and its ethical, social, and behavioral implications. Methods: We used focus groups to collect rich information about participants' perspectives on the ethical, social, and behavioral implications of PGI about HIV and host genetic research. We evaluated their reactions to three different types of genetic variants: Those that made them more susceptible to HIV, more protected from or resistant to HIV, or more likely to transmit HIV to others. Results: Overall, participants wanted PGI about HIV. Their reasons included a mix of personal or family health benefit and benefit to others, which varied in emphasis depending on variant type. While susceptibility variant information was seen primarily in terms of personal or family health benefit, for transmissibility and protective variant information, benefit to others emerged as a major reason for wanting PGI about HIV. Participants thought transmissibility variant information would help them prevent others from becoming infected, and protective variant information would allow them to volunteer for targeted research to help treat, cure, or prevent HIV. Possible harms were raised regarding the tendencies among some individuals to increase risky behavior with modulations in perceived risk. Potential behavioral implications were seen as significant, though complex, reflecting multifaceted risk perceptions. Conclusions: Our study adds to the evidence that participants in genetic research, across disease type, have a strong desire for PGI. For participants in research on the genetics of HIV, and potentially other infectious diseases, their desire for PGI is grounded in a perceived duty not to infect others, where they feel a moral responsibility regarding research participation and behavior change. Wider dissemination of HIV-related PGI may well increase research participation, but could have mixed effects on risk behavior. More research is needed on the implications of different variant types of PGI beyond susceptibility factors, especially protective variants or resistance factors.

KW - behavior

KW - ethics

KW - HIV

KW - Personal genetic information

KW - risk perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072076530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072076530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000501672

DO - 10.1159/000501672

M3 - Article

JO - Public Health Genomics

JF - Public Health Genomics

SN - 1662-4246

ER -