Perinatal outcome of conservative management versus fetal intervention for twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence with a small acardiac twin

Eric Jelin, Shinjiro Hirose, Larry Rand, Patrick Curran, Vickie Feldstein, Salvador Guevara-Gallardo, Angie Jelin, Kelly Gonzales, Ruth Goldstein, Hanmin Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To examine the outcomes of patients with twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence in which the acardiac twin was ≤50% the weight of the pump twin. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted with institutional review board approval. The records of all patients referred to UCSF for suspected diagnosis of TRAP between 1994 and 2009 were reviewed (n = 76). Patients with pregnancies complicated by TRAP with an acardiac twin ≤50% the weight of the pump twin were included (21 patients). Exclusion criteria were loss to follow-up (1 patient) and syndromic abnormalities in the pump twin (2 patients). Results: Of the 18 patients with viable pregnancies that met the criteria for analysis, 7 (39%) underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the acardiac twin and 11 (61%) underwent conservative management. None of the pump twins in either group had hydrops fetalis. Three of the 11 acardiac twins in the conservative management group did not undergo RFA because they did not have blood flow at presentation to UCSF. Survival to delivery was 100% (7/7) in the RFA group and 91% (10/11) in the conservative management group. When we eliminated from our analysis the 3 pregnancies in the conservative management group without blood flow to the acardiac twin, survival to delivery was 88% (7/8). The single death occurred in 1 of the 3 monochorionic-monoamniotic pregnancies in the conservative management group, all of whom had blood flow to the acardiac twin. There were no statistically significant differences in gestational age at delivery, birth weight or survival between the RFA and conservative management groups, even after stratification by blood flow. Conclusions: Conservative management with close monitoring appears to be a safe option for TRAP pregnancies in which the acardiac twin is ≤50% the weight of the pump twin.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138-141
Number of pages4
JournalFetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Perfusion
Pregnancy
Conservative Treatment
Weights and Measures
Survival
Hydrops Fetalis
Twin Pregnancy
Research Ethics Committees
Blood Group Antigens
Birth Weight
Gestational Age
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Acardiac twin
  • Monochorionic twins
  • Radiofrequency ablation
  • Twin reversed arterial perfusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Embryology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Perinatal outcome of conservative management versus fetal intervention for twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence with a small acardiac twin. / Jelin, Eric; Hirose, Shinjiro; Rand, Larry; Curran, Patrick; Feldstein, Vickie; Guevara-Gallardo, Salvador; Jelin, Angie; Gonzales, Kelly; Goldstein, Ruth; Lee, Hanmin.

In: Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, Vol. 27, No. 3, 04.2010, p. 138-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jelin, Eric ; Hirose, Shinjiro ; Rand, Larry ; Curran, Patrick ; Feldstein, Vickie ; Guevara-Gallardo, Salvador ; Jelin, Angie ; Gonzales, Kelly ; Goldstein, Ruth ; Lee, Hanmin. / Perinatal outcome of conservative management versus fetal intervention for twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence with a small acardiac twin. In: Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 2010 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 138-141.
@article{78fd946dd7e0413297b1cd9573087043,
title = "Perinatal outcome of conservative management versus fetal intervention for twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence with a small acardiac twin",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the outcomes of patients with twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence in which the acardiac twin was ≤50{\%} the weight of the pump twin. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted with institutional review board approval. The records of all patients referred to UCSF for suspected diagnosis of TRAP between 1994 and 2009 were reviewed (n = 76). Patients with pregnancies complicated by TRAP with an acardiac twin ≤50{\%} the weight of the pump twin were included (21 patients). Exclusion criteria were loss to follow-up (1 patient) and syndromic abnormalities in the pump twin (2 patients). Results: Of the 18 patients with viable pregnancies that met the criteria for analysis, 7 (39{\%}) underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the acardiac twin and 11 (61{\%}) underwent conservative management. None of the pump twins in either group had hydrops fetalis. Three of the 11 acardiac twins in the conservative management group did not undergo RFA because they did not have blood flow at presentation to UCSF. Survival to delivery was 100{\%} (7/7) in the RFA group and 91{\%} (10/11) in the conservative management group. When we eliminated from our analysis the 3 pregnancies in the conservative management group without blood flow to the acardiac twin, survival to delivery was 88{\%} (7/8). The single death occurred in 1 of the 3 monochorionic-monoamniotic pregnancies in the conservative management group, all of whom had blood flow to the acardiac twin. There were no statistically significant differences in gestational age at delivery, birth weight or survival between the RFA and conservative management groups, even after stratification by blood flow. Conclusions: Conservative management with close monitoring appears to be a safe option for TRAP pregnancies in which the acardiac twin is ≤50{\%} the weight of the pump twin.",
keywords = "Acardiac twin, Monochorionic twins, Radiofrequency ablation, Twin reversed arterial perfusion",
author = "Eric Jelin and Shinjiro Hirose and Larry Rand and Patrick Curran and Vickie Feldstein and Salvador Guevara-Gallardo and Angie Jelin and Kelly Gonzales and Ruth Goldstein and Hanmin Lee",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1159/000295176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "138--141",
journal = "Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy",
issn = "1015-3837",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perinatal outcome of conservative management versus fetal intervention for twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence with a small acardiac twin

AU - Jelin, Eric

AU - Hirose, Shinjiro

AU - Rand, Larry

AU - Curran, Patrick

AU - Feldstein, Vickie

AU - Guevara-Gallardo, Salvador

AU - Jelin, Angie

AU - Gonzales, Kelly

AU - Goldstein, Ruth

AU - Lee, Hanmin

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Objective: To examine the outcomes of patients with twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence in which the acardiac twin was ≤50% the weight of the pump twin. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted with institutional review board approval. The records of all patients referred to UCSF for suspected diagnosis of TRAP between 1994 and 2009 were reviewed (n = 76). Patients with pregnancies complicated by TRAP with an acardiac twin ≤50% the weight of the pump twin were included (21 patients). Exclusion criteria were loss to follow-up (1 patient) and syndromic abnormalities in the pump twin (2 patients). Results: Of the 18 patients with viable pregnancies that met the criteria for analysis, 7 (39%) underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the acardiac twin and 11 (61%) underwent conservative management. None of the pump twins in either group had hydrops fetalis. Three of the 11 acardiac twins in the conservative management group did not undergo RFA because they did not have blood flow at presentation to UCSF. Survival to delivery was 100% (7/7) in the RFA group and 91% (10/11) in the conservative management group. When we eliminated from our analysis the 3 pregnancies in the conservative management group without blood flow to the acardiac twin, survival to delivery was 88% (7/8). The single death occurred in 1 of the 3 monochorionic-monoamniotic pregnancies in the conservative management group, all of whom had blood flow to the acardiac twin. There were no statistically significant differences in gestational age at delivery, birth weight or survival between the RFA and conservative management groups, even after stratification by blood flow. Conclusions: Conservative management with close monitoring appears to be a safe option for TRAP pregnancies in which the acardiac twin is ≤50% the weight of the pump twin.

AB - Objective: To examine the outcomes of patients with twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence in which the acardiac twin was ≤50% the weight of the pump twin. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted with institutional review board approval. The records of all patients referred to UCSF for suspected diagnosis of TRAP between 1994 and 2009 were reviewed (n = 76). Patients with pregnancies complicated by TRAP with an acardiac twin ≤50% the weight of the pump twin were included (21 patients). Exclusion criteria were loss to follow-up (1 patient) and syndromic abnormalities in the pump twin (2 patients). Results: Of the 18 patients with viable pregnancies that met the criteria for analysis, 7 (39%) underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the acardiac twin and 11 (61%) underwent conservative management. None of the pump twins in either group had hydrops fetalis. Three of the 11 acardiac twins in the conservative management group did not undergo RFA because they did not have blood flow at presentation to UCSF. Survival to delivery was 100% (7/7) in the RFA group and 91% (10/11) in the conservative management group. When we eliminated from our analysis the 3 pregnancies in the conservative management group without blood flow to the acardiac twin, survival to delivery was 88% (7/8). The single death occurred in 1 of the 3 monochorionic-monoamniotic pregnancies in the conservative management group, all of whom had blood flow to the acardiac twin. There were no statistically significant differences in gestational age at delivery, birth weight or survival between the RFA and conservative management groups, even after stratification by blood flow. Conclusions: Conservative management with close monitoring appears to be a safe option for TRAP pregnancies in which the acardiac twin is ≤50% the weight of the pump twin.

KW - Acardiac twin

KW - Monochorionic twins

KW - Radiofrequency ablation

KW - Twin reversed arterial perfusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951880612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951880612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000295176

DO - 10.1159/000295176

M3 - Article

C2 - 20215730

AN - SCOPUS:77951880612

VL - 27

SP - 138

EP - 141

JO - Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy

JF - Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy

SN - 1015-3837

IS - 3

ER -