Perigraft fluid collections

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Imaging description Following ascending thoracic aorta surgery, it is common to identify fluid collections that surround the ascending aortic graft. These fluid collections are most often seen in the recent post-operative phase, are low in attenuation, and can range in thickness from millimeters to several centimeters (Figure 71.1). [1,2] Importance Perigraft fluid collections are important to distinguish from clinically significant causes of mediastinal fluid accumulation, namely post-operative mediastinal abscess or graft anastomotic dehissence. Typical clinical scenario Perigraft fluid collections are found in the majority of patients after graft repair of the ascending aorta and are generally of no clinical consequence. These fluid collections will usually progressively decrease in size and resolve; however, in some patients they may persist indefinitely (Figure 71.2). The etiology of perigraft fluid collections is uncertain. In the immediate post-operative phase these collections have been postulated to represent evolving hematoma. Persistent collections may be due to an inflammatory response to graft material, something also noted in patients with prior open abdominal aneurysm repair. Post-operative perigraft fluid collections should be distinguished from infected fluid collections or anastomotic dehissence. Thickened, enhancing walls surrounding the collection, inflammatory changes in the mediastinal fat, gas, or extension of the fluid into the sternal wound are signs of infection. Increasing size of a perigraft fluid collection is an important finding that should raise suspicion for infection, anastomotic dehissence, or both. Extensive air can also be seen in the setting of an aortoesophageal fistula (Figure 71.3). The presence of new extraluminal contrast or pseudoaneurysm within the perigraft fluid is a definitive sign ofanastomotic break down (Figure 71.3). In cases of slow or intermittent leaks, obvious signs of extraluminal contrast may be absent; however, imaging will show a perigraft collection containing high-attenuation material due to hematoma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages227-230
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)9781139152228, 9781107023727
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Transplants
Hematoma
Aorta
False Aneurysm
Wound Infection
Thoracic Aorta
Abscess
Thoracic Surgery
Fistula
Aneurysm
Gases
Fats
Air
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Zimmerman, S. (2015). Perigraft fluid collections. In Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses (pp. 227-230). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152228.072

Perigraft fluid collections. / Zimmerman, Stefan.

Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses. Cambridge University Press, 2015. p. 227-230.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Zimmerman, S 2015, Perigraft fluid collections. in Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses. Cambridge University Press, pp. 227-230. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152228.072
Zimmerman S. Perigraft fluid collections. In Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses. Cambridge University Press. 2015. p. 227-230 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152228.072
Zimmerman, Stefan. / Perigraft fluid collections. Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses. Cambridge University Press, 2015. pp. 227-230
@inbook{a975f37243c444f7a0c9770cccaa7b5d,
title = "Perigraft fluid collections",
abstract = "Imaging description Following ascending thoracic aorta surgery, it is common to identify fluid collections that surround the ascending aortic graft. These fluid collections are most often seen in the recent post-operative phase, are low in attenuation, and can range in thickness from millimeters to several centimeters (Figure 71.1). [1,2] Importance Perigraft fluid collections are important to distinguish from clinically significant causes of mediastinal fluid accumulation, namely post-operative mediastinal abscess or graft anastomotic dehissence. Typical clinical scenario Perigraft fluid collections are found in the majority of patients after graft repair of the ascending aorta and are generally of no clinical consequence. These fluid collections will usually progressively decrease in size and resolve; however, in some patients they may persist indefinitely (Figure 71.2). The etiology of perigraft fluid collections is uncertain. In the immediate post-operative phase these collections have been postulated to represent evolving hematoma. Persistent collections may be due to an inflammatory response to graft material, something also noted in patients with prior open abdominal aneurysm repair. Post-operative perigraft fluid collections should be distinguished from infected fluid collections or anastomotic dehissence. Thickened, enhancing walls surrounding the collection, inflammatory changes in the mediastinal fat, gas, or extension of the fluid into the sternal wound are signs of infection. Increasing size of a perigraft fluid collection is an important finding that should raise suspicion for infection, anastomotic dehissence, or both. Extensive air can also be seen in the setting of an aortoesophageal fistula (Figure 71.3). The presence of new extraluminal contrast or pseudoaneurysm within the perigraft fluid is a definitive sign ofanastomotic break down (Figure 71.3). In cases of slow or intermittent leaks, obvious signs of extraluminal contrast may be absent; however, imaging will show a perigraft collection containing high-attenuation material due to hematoma.",
author = "Stefan Zimmerman",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139152228.072",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781139152228",
pages = "227--230",
booktitle = "Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Perigraft fluid collections

AU - Zimmerman, Stefan

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Imaging description Following ascending thoracic aorta surgery, it is common to identify fluid collections that surround the ascending aortic graft. These fluid collections are most often seen in the recent post-operative phase, are low in attenuation, and can range in thickness from millimeters to several centimeters (Figure 71.1). [1,2] Importance Perigraft fluid collections are important to distinguish from clinically significant causes of mediastinal fluid accumulation, namely post-operative mediastinal abscess or graft anastomotic dehissence. Typical clinical scenario Perigraft fluid collections are found in the majority of patients after graft repair of the ascending aorta and are generally of no clinical consequence. These fluid collections will usually progressively decrease in size and resolve; however, in some patients they may persist indefinitely (Figure 71.2). The etiology of perigraft fluid collections is uncertain. In the immediate post-operative phase these collections have been postulated to represent evolving hematoma. Persistent collections may be due to an inflammatory response to graft material, something also noted in patients with prior open abdominal aneurysm repair. Post-operative perigraft fluid collections should be distinguished from infected fluid collections or anastomotic dehissence. Thickened, enhancing walls surrounding the collection, inflammatory changes in the mediastinal fat, gas, or extension of the fluid into the sternal wound are signs of infection. Increasing size of a perigraft fluid collection is an important finding that should raise suspicion for infection, anastomotic dehissence, or both. Extensive air can also be seen in the setting of an aortoesophageal fistula (Figure 71.3). The presence of new extraluminal contrast or pseudoaneurysm within the perigraft fluid is a definitive sign ofanastomotic break down (Figure 71.3). In cases of slow or intermittent leaks, obvious signs of extraluminal contrast may be absent; however, imaging will show a perigraft collection containing high-attenuation material due to hematoma.

AB - Imaging description Following ascending thoracic aorta surgery, it is common to identify fluid collections that surround the ascending aortic graft. These fluid collections are most often seen in the recent post-operative phase, are low in attenuation, and can range in thickness from millimeters to several centimeters (Figure 71.1). [1,2] Importance Perigraft fluid collections are important to distinguish from clinically significant causes of mediastinal fluid accumulation, namely post-operative mediastinal abscess or graft anastomotic dehissence. Typical clinical scenario Perigraft fluid collections are found in the majority of patients after graft repair of the ascending aorta and are generally of no clinical consequence. These fluid collections will usually progressively decrease in size and resolve; however, in some patients they may persist indefinitely (Figure 71.2). The etiology of perigraft fluid collections is uncertain. In the immediate post-operative phase these collections have been postulated to represent evolving hematoma. Persistent collections may be due to an inflammatory response to graft material, something also noted in patients with prior open abdominal aneurysm repair. Post-operative perigraft fluid collections should be distinguished from infected fluid collections or anastomotic dehissence. Thickened, enhancing walls surrounding the collection, inflammatory changes in the mediastinal fat, gas, or extension of the fluid into the sternal wound are signs of infection. Increasing size of a perigraft fluid collection is an important finding that should raise suspicion for infection, anastomotic dehissence, or both. Extensive air can also be seen in the setting of an aortoesophageal fistula (Figure 71.3). The presence of new extraluminal contrast or pseudoaneurysm within the perigraft fluid is a definitive sign ofanastomotic break down (Figure 71.3). In cases of slow or intermittent leaks, obvious signs of extraluminal contrast may be absent; however, imaging will show a perigraft collection containing high-attenuation material due to hematoma.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954157249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954157249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139152228.072

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139152228.072

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781139152228

SN - 9781107023727

SP - 227

EP - 230

BT - Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging: Pseudolesions, Artifacts and Other Difficult Diagnoses

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -