TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of the tobacco, alcohol, prescription medication, and other substance use (TAPS) tool for substance use screening in primary care patients
AU - McNeely, Jennifer
AU - Wu, Li Tzy
AU - Subramaniam, Geetha
AU - Sharma, Gaurav
AU - Cathers, Lauretta A.
AU - Svikis, Dace
AU - Sleiter, Luke
AU - Russell, Linnea
AU - Nordeck, Courtney
AU - Sharma, Anjalee
AU - O-Grady, Kevin E.
AU - Bouk, Leah B.
AU - Cushing, Carol
AU - King, Jacqueline
AU - Wahle, Aimee
AU - Schwartz, Robert P.
N1 - Funding Information:
National Institute on Drug Abuse cooperative grant awards UG1DA013034, U10DA013727, UG1DA040317, and UG1DA013035.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American College of Physicians.
PY - 2016/11/15
Y1 - 2016/11/15
N2 - Background: Substance use, a leading cause of illness and death, is underidentified in medical practice. Objective: The Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) tool was developed to address the need for a brief screening and assessment instrument that includes all commonly used substances and fits into clinical workflows. The goal of this study was to assess the performance of the TAPS tool in primary care patients. Design: Multisite study, conducted within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network, comparing the TAPS tool with a reference standard measure. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02110693) Setting: 5 adult primary care clinics. Participants: 2000 adult patients consecutively recruited from clinic waiting areas. Measurements: Interviewer- and self-administered versions of the TAPS tool were compared with a reference standard, the modified World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), which measures problem use and substance use disorder (SUD). Results: Interviewer- and self-administered versions of the TAPS tool had similar diagnostic characteristics. For identifying problem use (at a cutoff of 1+), the TAPS tool had a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90 to 0.95) and specificity of 0.87 (CI, 0.85 to 0.89) for tobacco and a sensitivity of 0.74 (CI, 0.70 to 0.78) and specificity of 0.79 (CI, 0.76 to 0.81) for alcohol. For problem use of illicit and prescription drugs, sensitivity ranged from 0.82 (CI, 0.76 to 0.87) for marijuana to 0.63 (CI, 0.47 to 0.78) for sedatives; specificity was 0.93 or higher. For identifying any SUD (at a cutoff of 2+), sensitivity was lower. Limitations: The low prevalence of some drug classes led to poor precision in some estimates. Research assistants were not blinded to participants' TAPS tool responses when they administered the CIDI. Conclusion: In a diverse population of adult primary care patients, the TAPS tool detected clinically relevant problem substance use. Although it also may detect tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use disorders, further refinement is needed before it can be recommended broadly for SUD screening.
AB - Background: Substance use, a leading cause of illness and death, is underidentified in medical practice. Objective: The Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medication, and other Substance use (TAPS) tool was developed to address the need for a brief screening and assessment instrument that includes all commonly used substances and fits into clinical workflows. The goal of this study was to assess the performance of the TAPS tool in primary care patients. Design: Multisite study, conducted within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network, comparing the TAPS tool with a reference standard measure. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02110693) Setting: 5 adult primary care clinics. Participants: 2000 adult patients consecutively recruited from clinic waiting areas. Measurements: Interviewer- and self-administered versions of the TAPS tool were compared with a reference standard, the modified World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), which measures problem use and substance use disorder (SUD). Results: Interviewer- and self-administered versions of the TAPS tool had similar diagnostic characteristics. For identifying problem use (at a cutoff of 1+), the TAPS tool had a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90 to 0.95) and specificity of 0.87 (CI, 0.85 to 0.89) for tobacco and a sensitivity of 0.74 (CI, 0.70 to 0.78) and specificity of 0.79 (CI, 0.76 to 0.81) for alcohol. For problem use of illicit and prescription drugs, sensitivity ranged from 0.82 (CI, 0.76 to 0.87) for marijuana to 0.63 (CI, 0.47 to 0.78) for sedatives; specificity was 0.93 or higher. For identifying any SUD (at a cutoff of 2+), sensitivity was lower. Limitations: The low prevalence of some drug classes led to poor precision in some estimates. Research assistants were not blinded to participants' TAPS tool responses when they administered the CIDI. Conclusion: In a diverse population of adult primary care patients, the TAPS tool detected clinically relevant problem substance use. Although it also may detect tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use disorders, further refinement is needed before it can be recommended broadly for SUD screening.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995903914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995903914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7326/M16-0317
DO - 10.7326/M16-0317
M3 - Article
C2 - 27595276
AN - SCOPUS:84995903914
SN - 0003-4819
VL - 165
SP - 690
EP - 699
JO - Annals of internal medicine
JF - Annals of internal medicine
IS - 10
ER -