Performance and conduct of supply chains for United States farmed oysters

David C. Love, Robert M. Lane, Lillian M. Kuehl, Bobbi Hudson, Jamie Harding, Kate Clancy, Jillian P. Fry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Farmed oysters are one of the most valuable aquacultured products in the United States (U.S.), are highly perishable, and increasingly shipped live year-round. Supply chain actors must work together to bring refrigerated oysters to market quickly, while maintaining product value, safety and traceability information. In light of these demands, this study assesses the performance and conduct of supply chains for U.S. farmed oysters (Crassostrea virginica, C. gigas). Over the two-year study period, we conducted interviews with 56 businesses and tracked 125 oyster shipments from two major growing regions in the U.S. through six different types of supply chains. We hypothesized that direct and intermediated supply chains would perform differently in terms of time-to-market, product temperature in cold chains, compliance with temperature regulations, and modeled risks from Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Intermediated supply chains, by their definition have more connections than direct supply chains, and we found this introduces a longer time-to-market and a higher incidence of time and temperature abuse. However, these factors did not lead to greater modeled V. parahaemolyticus risks. Participants in both direct and intermediated supply chains were aware of the importance of traceability and felt uniformly positive about their ability to perform recalls. A common concern was the speed of government-imposed recalls, which can be declared by regulators after the affected live oysters are consumed. Members of these supply chains play different roles in maintaining the cold chain, possess different levels of information related to traceability, and describe different levels of trust with other supply chain actors. This paper contributes to a growing body of knowledge on supply chains for seafood and their critical, and sometimes overlooked, role in larger food systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number734569
JournalAquaculture
Volume515
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2020

Fingerprint

supply chain
oysters
market
seafood
temperature
traceability
compliance
Vibrio parahaemolyticus
safety
markets
food
product
Crassostrea virginica
Crassostrea gigas
seafoods
angle of incidence
cold
interviews

Keywords

  • Chesapeake bay
  • Oyster
  • Shellfish
  • Supply chain
  • Traceability
  • Washington

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science

Cite this

Performance and conduct of supply chains for United States farmed oysters. / Love, David C.; Lane, Robert M.; Kuehl, Lillian M.; Hudson, Bobbi; Harding, Jamie; Clancy, Kate; Fry, Jillian P.

In: Aquaculture, Vol. 515, 734569, 15.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Love, David C. ; Lane, Robert M. ; Kuehl, Lillian M. ; Hudson, Bobbi ; Harding, Jamie ; Clancy, Kate ; Fry, Jillian P. / Performance and conduct of supply chains for United States farmed oysters. In: Aquaculture. 2020 ; Vol. 515.
@article{8bd685d2e1d54645a4904360af2f8bca,
title = "Performance and conduct of supply chains for United States farmed oysters",
abstract = "Farmed oysters are one of the most valuable aquacultured products in the United States (U.S.), are highly perishable, and increasingly shipped live year-round. Supply chain actors must work together to bring refrigerated oysters to market quickly, while maintaining product value, safety and traceability information. In light of these demands, this study assesses the performance and conduct of supply chains for U.S. farmed oysters (Crassostrea virginica, C. gigas). Over the two-year study period, we conducted interviews with 56 businesses and tracked 125 oyster shipments from two major growing regions in the U.S. through six different types of supply chains. We hypothesized that direct and intermediated supply chains would perform differently in terms of time-to-market, product temperature in cold chains, compliance with temperature regulations, and modeled risks from Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Intermediated supply chains, by their definition have more connections than direct supply chains, and we found this introduces a longer time-to-market and a higher incidence of time and temperature abuse. However, these factors did not lead to greater modeled V. parahaemolyticus risks. Participants in both direct and intermediated supply chains were aware of the importance of traceability and felt uniformly positive about their ability to perform recalls. A common concern was the speed of government-imposed recalls, which can be declared by regulators after the affected live oysters are consumed. Members of these supply chains play different roles in maintaining the cold chain, possess different levels of information related to traceability, and describe different levels of trust with other supply chain actors. This paper contributes to a growing body of knowledge on supply chains for seafood and their critical, and sometimes overlooked, role in larger food systems.",
keywords = "Chesapeake bay, Oyster, Shellfish, Supply chain, Traceability, Washington",
author = "Love, {David C.} and Lane, {Robert M.} and Kuehl, {Lillian M.} and Bobbi Hudson and Jamie Harding and Kate Clancy and Fry, {Jillian P.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734569",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "515",
journal = "Aquaculture",
issn = "0044-8486",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance and conduct of supply chains for United States farmed oysters

AU - Love, David C.

AU - Lane, Robert M.

AU - Kuehl, Lillian M.

AU - Hudson, Bobbi

AU - Harding, Jamie

AU - Clancy, Kate

AU - Fry, Jillian P.

PY - 2020/1/15

Y1 - 2020/1/15

N2 - Farmed oysters are one of the most valuable aquacultured products in the United States (U.S.), are highly perishable, and increasingly shipped live year-round. Supply chain actors must work together to bring refrigerated oysters to market quickly, while maintaining product value, safety and traceability information. In light of these demands, this study assesses the performance and conduct of supply chains for U.S. farmed oysters (Crassostrea virginica, C. gigas). Over the two-year study period, we conducted interviews with 56 businesses and tracked 125 oyster shipments from two major growing regions in the U.S. through six different types of supply chains. We hypothesized that direct and intermediated supply chains would perform differently in terms of time-to-market, product temperature in cold chains, compliance with temperature regulations, and modeled risks from Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Intermediated supply chains, by their definition have more connections than direct supply chains, and we found this introduces a longer time-to-market and a higher incidence of time and temperature abuse. However, these factors did not lead to greater modeled V. parahaemolyticus risks. Participants in both direct and intermediated supply chains were aware of the importance of traceability and felt uniformly positive about their ability to perform recalls. A common concern was the speed of government-imposed recalls, which can be declared by regulators after the affected live oysters are consumed. Members of these supply chains play different roles in maintaining the cold chain, possess different levels of information related to traceability, and describe different levels of trust with other supply chain actors. This paper contributes to a growing body of knowledge on supply chains for seafood and their critical, and sometimes overlooked, role in larger food systems.

AB - Farmed oysters are one of the most valuable aquacultured products in the United States (U.S.), are highly perishable, and increasingly shipped live year-round. Supply chain actors must work together to bring refrigerated oysters to market quickly, while maintaining product value, safety and traceability information. In light of these demands, this study assesses the performance and conduct of supply chains for U.S. farmed oysters (Crassostrea virginica, C. gigas). Over the two-year study period, we conducted interviews with 56 businesses and tracked 125 oyster shipments from two major growing regions in the U.S. through six different types of supply chains. We hypothesized that direct and intermediated supply chains would perform differently in terms of time-to-market, product temperature in cold chains, compliance with temperature regulations, and modeled risks from Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Intermediated supply chains, by their definition have more connections than direct supply chains, and we found this introduces a longer time-to-market and a higher incidence of time and temperature abuse. However, these factors did not lead to greater modeled V. parahaemolyticus risks. Participants in both direct and intermediated supply chains were aware of the importance of traceability and felt uniformly positive about their ability to perform recalls. A common concern was the speed of government-imposed recalls, which can be declared by regulators after the affected live oysters are consumed. Members of these supply chains play different roles in maintaining the cold chain, possess different levels of information related to traceability, and describe different levels of trust with other supply chain actors. This paper contributes to a growing body of knowledge on supply chains for seafood and their critical, and sometimes overlooked, role in larger food systems.

KW - Chesapeake bay

KW - Oyster

KW - Shellfish

KW - Supply chain

KW - Traceability

KW - Washington

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073516874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073516874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734569

DO - 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734569

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073516874

VL - 515

JO - Aquaculture

JF - Aquaculture

SN - 0044-8486

M1 - 734569

ER -