Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in small medically complex infants

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and study aims: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is an established procedure for pediatric patients; however, there is still relatively little information on its feasibility and safety in very small infants. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in infants weighing less than 3.5 kg. Patients and methods: The charts of 26 infants weighing less than 3.5 kg who received PEGs were retrospectively reviewed. Results: At the time of gastrostomy insertion the mean weight was 3 kg and the mean age was 2.3 months. This population of infants carried multiple diagnoses including lung disease of prematurity, swallowing dysfunction, chromosomal abnormality, structural facial anomaly, neurological deficit and congenital heart disease. Infants received either a 14- or 15-Fr percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube under general anesthesia. All 26 procedures were successfully completed. Two infants (7.6%) developed a pneumoperitoneum during the procedure which required intervention. Two infants (7.6%) were conservatively treated with oral antibiotics for mild skin erythema and one infant (3.8%) required intravenous antibiotics for cellulitis of the stoma site. There were no other complications. To date, 16 of the gastrostomy tubes (61.5%) have been removed by traction without complication. Conclusions: PEGs can be safely placed in very small, medically complex infants. Pneumoperitoneum, which is a common but usually insignificant occurrence in adults and children during PEG placement, may require intervention in the small infant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-436
Number of pages4
JournalEndoscopy
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 9 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in small medically complex infants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this