TY - JOUR
T1 - Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the revision versus primary adult spinal deformity patient
AU - Gupta, Munish C.
AU - Ferrero, Emmanuelle
AU - Mundis, Gregory
AU - Smith, Justin S.
AU - Shaffrey, Christopher I.
AU - Schwab, Frank
AU - Kim, Han Jo
AU - Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba
AU - Lafage, Virginie
AU - Bess, Shay
AU - Hostin, Richard
AU - Burton, Douglas C.
AU - Ames, Christopher P.
AU - Kebaish, Khaled
AU - Klineberg, Eric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - Study Design. Multicenter, prospective study of consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. Objective. To compare alignment correction and perioperative complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) in the primary versus revision surgery setting for ASD. Summary of Background Data. PSO are performed to correct sagittal plane deformity; however, these are difficult procedures that have potential for large blood loss and risk for intraoperative and postoperative complications. Methods. Inclusion criteria were age at least 18 years, lumbar PSO, and available data on perioperative (up to 6 weeks after surgery) complication data. Patients were classified according to SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers: PT (pelvic tilt), SVA (sagittal vertical axis), and lumbo-pelvic mismatch (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis). Patients were divided into primary (P; no previous spine fusion surgery) or revision (R; previous fusion). Baseline and 1-year demographic, radiographic parameters, complications and revision rates were analyzed. Results. A total of 421 patients were included. P (n=70) and R (n=351) were similar for age, body mass index, sex, mean total Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) levels (P=10.0; R=10.5), PSO angle (P=27°; R=25°), estimated blood loss (P=2.76L; R=2.92L), and operative time (P=437min; R=434min). The most common osteotomy site was L3 for both primary (31.8%) and revision groups (43.6%). Both groups demonstrated improvement in sagittal spinopelvic parameters from baseline to 1 year, with similar changes in sagittal modifiers except for the pelvic mismatch that improved to a grade 0 (i.e., less than 10°) more often for primary PSO group (83%) than revision PSO group (57%; P=0.004). Complication rates were similar (P>0.05) for the following: new motor deficit (P=4.2%, R=9.4%), bowel/bladder deficit (P=1.4%, R=2.8%), 1-year revision rate (P=4.3%, R=7.4%), and pseudarthrosis rate (P=1.4%; R=2.5%; P<0.05). Conclusion. PSO may be performed in primary or revision ASD patient with similar sagittal deformity correction and similar complication rates; however, primary PSO patients were more likely to achieve better lumbo-pelvic mismatch correction.
AB - Study Design. Multicenter, prospective study of consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. Objective. To compare alignment correction and perioperative complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) in the primary versus revision surgery setting for ASD. Summary of Background Data. PSO are performed to correct sagittal plane deformity; however, these are difficult procedures that have potential for large blood loss and risk for intraoperative and postoperative complications. Methods. Inclusion criteria were age at least 18 years, lumbar PSO, and available data on perioperative (up to 6 weeks after surgery) complication data. Patients were classified according to SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers: PT (pelvic tilt), SVA (sagittal vertical axis), and lumbo-pelvic mismatch (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis). Patients were divided into primary (P; no previous spine fusion surgery) or revision (R; previous fusion). Baseline and 1-year demographic, radiographic parameters, complications and revision rates were analyzed. Results. A total of 421 patients were included. P (n=70) and R (n=351) were similar for age, body mass index, sex, mean total Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) levels (P=10.0; R=10.5), PSO angle (P=27°; R=25°), estimated blood loss (P=2.76L; R=2.92L), and operative time (P=437min; R=434min). The most common osteotomy site was L3 for both primary (31.8%) and revision groups (43.6%). Both groups demonstrated improvement in sagittal spinopelvic parameters from baseline to 1 year, with similar changes in sagittal modifiers except for the pelvic mismatch that improved to a grade 0 (i.e., less than 10°) more often for primary PSO group (83%) than revision PSO group (57%; P=0.004). Complication rates were similar (P>0.05) for the following: new motor deficit (P=4.2%, R=9.4%), bowel/bladder deficit (P=1.4%, R=2.8%), 1-year revision rate (P=4.3%, R=7.4%), and pseudarthrosis rate (P=1.4%; R=2.5%; P<0.05). Conclusion. PSO may be performed in primary or revision ASD patient with similar sagittal deformity correction and similar complication rates; however, primary PSO patients were more likely to achieve better lumbo-pelvic mismatch correction.
KW - SRS-Schwab classification
KW - adult spinal deformity
KW - complication
KW - motor deficit
KW - pedicle subtraction osteotomy
KW - pelvic tilt
KW - primary surgery
KW - revision
KW - revision surgery
KW - sagittal alignment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963700019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963700019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001107
DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001107
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26730526
AN - SCOPUS:84963700019
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 40
SP - E1169-E1175
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 22
ER -