Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness: Gaps in Inpatient Intrateam Communication

Ryan S. Hirschfeld, Silvana Barone, Emily Johnson, Renee D. Boss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The number of children with medical complexity and prolonged hospitalizations is rising. Strategies to adapt acute care approaches for this population are falling behind clinical demand. This study aimed to identify how inpatient team communication practices match the needs of teams caring for these patients and families, and to identify priority areas for improvement. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mixed methods survey. SETTING: Academic children's hospital. SUBJECTS: Interdisciplinary healthcare professionals: physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, resident and fellow trainees, respiratory therapists, clinical pharmacists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, social workers, and child life specialists.None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four-hundred eight interdisciplinary healthcare professionals participated (33% response rate). Half (53%) worked in ICUs and 37% had greater than 10 years clinical experience. Three overarching themes emerged regarding communication during care of children with prolonged hospitalizations are as follows: 1) Dysfunctional team collaboration: the many involved healthcare providers for these children have inconsistent team meetings and few platforms for reaching clinical consensus; 2) Continuity gaps: time-limited clinician rotations and no designated longitudinal clinical leaders undermine relationships with families and key elements of shared decision-making; and 3) Inadequate communication skills and tools: healthcare professionals have inadequate training to address complex conversations and big picture concerns, and often default to daily management conversations. Nearly half (40%) perceived intra-team conflict to occur more commonly during care of these children compared with those with short hospitalizations, and many feel unskilled to address these conflicts. Healthcare providers working in ICUs were more likely than other healthcare providers to find care of children with chronic critical illness stressful "most of the time" (ICU 46%; 60/131 vs non-ICU 25%; 21/84; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Acute care inpatient communication practices require modification to meet the needs of healthcare professionals who provide longitudinal care to children with repeated and prolonged hospitalizations. Improvement strategies should prioritize building collaboration, continuity, and communication skills among healthcare professionals.

Fingerprint

Critical Illness
Inpatients
Child Care
Chronic Disease
Communication
Pediatrics
Delivery of Health Care
Hospitalization
Health Personnel
Accidental Falls
Nurse Practitioners
Physical Therapists
Pharmacists
Consensus
Decision Making
Nurses
Physicians
Population
Conflict (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

@article{e54b321239744d77bb32c284b77d194e,
title = "Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness: Gaps in Inpatient Intrateam Communication",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The number of children with medical complexity and prolonged hospitalizations is rising. Strategies to adapt acute care approaches for this population are falling behind clinical demand. This study aimed to identify how inpatient team communication practices match the needs of teams caring for these patients and families, and to identify priority areas for improvement. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mixed methods survey. SETTING: Academic children's hospital. SUBJECTS: Interdisciplinary healthcare professionals: physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, resident and fellow trainees, respiratory therapists, clinical pharmacists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, social workers, and child life specialists.None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four-hundred eight interdisciplinary healthcare professionals participated (33{\%} response rate). Half (53{\%}) worked in ICUs and 37{\%} had greater than 10 years clinical experience. Three overarching themes emerged regarding communication during care of children with prolonged hospitalizations are as follows: 1) Dysfunctional team collaboration: the many involved healthcare providers for these children have inconsistent team meetings and few platforms for reaching clinical consensus; 2) Continuity gaps: time-limited clinician rotations and no designated longitudinal clinical leaders undermine relationships with families and key elements of shared decision-making; and 3) Inadequate communication skills and tools: healthcare professionals have inadequate training to address complex conversations and big picture concerns, and often default to daily management conversations. Nearly half (40{\%}) perceived intra-team conflict to occur more commonly during care of these children compared with those with short hospitalizations, and many feel unskilled to address these conflicts. Healthcare providers working in ICUs were more likely than other healthcare providers to find care of children with chronic critical illness stressful {"}most of the time{"} (ICU 46{\%}; 60/131 vs non-ICU 25{\%}; 21/84; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Acute care inpatient communication practices require modification to meet the needs of healthcare professionals who provide longitudinal care to children with repeated and prolonged hospitalizations. Improvement strategies should prioritize building collaboration, continuity, and communication skills among healthcare professionals.",
author = "Hirschfeld, {Ryan S.} and Silvana Barone and Emily Johnson and Boss, {Renee D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PCC.0000000000002150",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "e546--e555",
journal = "Pediatric Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1529-7535",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness

T2 - Gaps in Inpatient Intrateam Communication

AU - Hirschfeld, Ryan S.

AU - Barone, Silvana

AU - Johnson, Emily

AU - Boss, Renee D.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The number of children with medical complexity and prolonged hospitalizations is rising. Strategies to adapt acute care approaches for this population are falling behind clinical demand. This study aimed to identify how inpatient team communication practices match the needs of teams caring for these patients and families, and to identify priority areas for improvement. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mixed methods survey. SETTING: Academic children's hospital. SUBJECTS: Interdisciplinary healthcare professionals: physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, resident and fellow trainees, respiratory therapists, clinical pharmacists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, social workers, and child life specialists.None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four-hundred eight interdisciplinary healthcare professionals participated (33% response rate). Half (53%) worked in ICUs and 37% had greater than 10 years clinical experience. Three overarching themes emerged regarding communication during care of children with prolonged hospitalizations are as follows: 1) Dysfunctional team collaboration: the many involved healthcare providers for these children have inconsistent team meetings and few platforms for reaching clinical consensus; 2) Continuity gaps: time-limited clinician rotations and no designated longitudinal clinical leaders undermine relationships with families and key elements of shared decision-making; and 3) Inadequate communication skills and tools: healthcare professionals have inadequate training to address complex conversations and big picture concerns, and often default to daily management conversations. Nearly half (40%) perceived intra-team conflict to occur more commonly during care of these children compared with those with short hospitalizations, and many feel unskilled to address these conflicts. Healthcare providers working in ICUs were more likely than other healthcare providers to find care of children with chronic critical illness stressful "most of the time" (ICU 46%; 60/131 vs non-ICU 25%; 21/84; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Acute care inpatient communication practices require modification to meet the needs of healthcare professionals who provide longitudinal care to children with repeated and prolonged hospitalizations. Improvement strategies should prioritize building collaboration, continuity, and communication skills among healthcare professionals.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The number of children with medical complexity and prolonged hospitalizations is rising. Strategies to adapt acute care approaches for this population are falling behind clinical demand. This study aimed to identify how inpatient team communication practices match the needs of teams caring for these patients and families, and to identify priority areas for improvement. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mixed methods survey. SETTING: Academic children's hospital. SUBJECTS: Interdisciplinary healthcare professionals: physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, resident and fellow trainees, respiratory therapists, clinical pharmacists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, social workers, and child life specialists.None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four-hundred eight interdisciplinary healthcare professionals participated (33% response rate). Half (53%) worked in ICUs and 37% had greater than 10 years clinical experience. Three overarching themes emerged regarding communication during care of children with prolonged hospitalizations are as follows: 1) Dysfunctional team collaboration: the many involved healthcare providers for these children have inconsistent team meetings and few platforms for reaching clinical consensus; 2) Continuity gaps: time-limited clinician rotations and no designated longitudinal clinical leaders undermine relationships with families and key elements of shared decision-making; and 3) Inadequate communication skills and tools: healthcare professionals have inadequate training to address complex conversations and big picture concerns, and often default to daily management conversations. Nearly half (40%) perceived intra-team conflict to occur more commonly during care of these children compared with those with short hospitalizations, and many feel unskilled to address these conflicts. Healthcare providers working in ICUs were more likely than other healthcare providers to find care of children with chronic critical illness stressful "most of the time" (ICU 46%; 60/131 vs non-ICU 25%; 21/84; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Acute care inpatient communication practices require modification to meet the needs of healthcare professionals who provide longitudinal care to children with repeated and prolonged hospitalizations. Improvement strategies should prioritize building collaboration, continuity, and communication skills among healthcare professionals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075962522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075962522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002150

DO - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002150

M3 - Article

C2 - 31634307

AN - SCOPUS:85075962522

VL - 20

SP - e546-e555

JO - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

JF - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1529-7535

IS - 12

ER -