Patterns of variance in /s/ during normal and glossectomy speech

Maureen Stone, Jonghye Woo, Jiachen Zhuo, Hegang Chen, Jerry Ladd Prince

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The production of speech includes considerable variability in speech gestures despite our perception of very repeatable sounds. Variability is seen in vocal tract shapes and tongue contours when different speakers produce the same sound. This study asks whether internal tongue motion patterns for a specific sound are similar across subjects, or whether they indicate multiple gestures. There are two variants of the sound /s/, which may produce two gestures or may represent a multitude of gestures. The first goal of this paper was to quantify internal tongue differences between these allophones in normal speakers. The second goal was to test how these differences are affected by subjects expected to have different speech gestures: normal controls and subjects who have had tongue cancer surgery. The study used tagged MRI to capture midsagittal tongue motion patterns and principal components analyses to identify patterns of variability that define subject groups and /s/ types. Results showed no motion differences between apical and laminal controls in either the tongue tip or whole tongue. These results did not support unique tongue behaviours for apical and laminal /s/. The apical patients, however, differed from all other speakers and were quite uniform as a group. They had no elevation and considerable downward/backward motion of the tongue tip. This was consistent with difficulty in maintaining the tip–blade region at the proper distance from the palate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-207
Number of pages11
JournalComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2014

Fingerprint

Glossectomy
Tongue
Gestures
Acoustic waves
Magnetic resonance imaging
Surgery
Tongue Neoplasms
Palate
Principal Component Analysis

Keywords

  • MRI
  • principal components
  • speech
  • tongue motion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Patterns of variance in /s/ during normal and glossectomy speech. / Stone, Maureen; Woo, Jonghye; Zhuo, Jiachen; Chen, Hegang; Prince, Jerry Ladd.

In: Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization, Vol. 2, No. 4, 02.10.2014, p. 197-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b2c0f3f7b2de48bbbffe44e39ba56c33,
title = "Patterns of variance in /s/ during normal and glossectomy speech",
abstract = "The production of speech includes considerable variability in speech gestures despite our perception of very repeatable sounds. Variability is seen in vocal tract shapes and tongue contours when different speakers produce the same sound. This study asks whether internal tongue motion patterns for a specific sound are similar across subjects, or whether they indicate multiple gestures. There are two variants of the sound /s/, which may produce two gestures or may represent a multitude of gestures. The first goal of this paper was to quantify internal tongue differences between these allophones in normal speakers. The second goal was to test how these differences are affected by subjects expected to have different speech gestures: normal controls and subjects who have had tongue cancer surgery. The study used tagged MRI to capture midsagittal tongue motion patterns and principal components analyses to identify patterns of variability that define subject groups and /s/ types. Results showed no motion differences between apical and laminal controls in either the tongue tip or whole tongue. These results did not support unique tongue behaviours for apical and laminal /s/. The apical patients, however, differed from all other speakers and were quite uniform as a group. They had no elevation and considerable downward/backward motion of the tongue tip. This was consistent with difficulty in maintaining the tip–blade region at the proper distance from the palate.",
keywords = "MRI, principal components, speech, tongue motion",
author = "Maureen Stone and Jonghye Woo and Jiachen Zhuo and Hegang Chen and Prince, {Jerry Ladd}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/21681163.2013.837841",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "197--207",
journal = "Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization",
issn = "2168-1163",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns of variance in /s/ during normal and glossectomy speech

AU - Stone, Maureen

AU - Woo, Jonghye

AU - Zhuo, Jiachen

AU - Chen, Hegang

AU - Prince, Jerry Ladd

PY - 2014/10/2

Y1 - 2014/10/2

N2 - The production of speech includes considerable variability in speech gestures despite our perception of very repeatable sounds. Variability is seen in vocal tract shapes and tongue contours when different speakers produce the same sound. This study asks whether internal tongue motion patterns for a specific sound are similar across subjects, or whether they indicate multiple gestures. There are two variants of the sound /s/, which may produce two gestures or may represent a multitude of gestures. The first goal of this paper was to quantify internal tongue differences between these allophones in normal speakers. The second goal was to test how these differences are affected by subjects expected to have different speech gestures: normal controls and subjects who have had tongue cancer surgery. The study used tagged MRI to capture midsagittal tongue motion patterns and principal components analyses to identify patterns of variability that define subject groups and /s/ types. Results showed no motion differences between apical and laminal controls in either the tongue tip or whole tongue. These results did not support unique tongue behaviours for apical and laminal /s/. The apical patients, however, differed from all other speakers and were quite uniform as a group. They had no elevation and considerable downward/backward motion of the tongue tip. This was consistent with difficulty in maintaining the tip–blade region at the proper distance from the palate.

AB - The production of speech includes considerable variability in speech gestures despite our perception of very repeatable sounds. Variability is seen in vocal tract shapes and tongue contours when different speakers produce the same sound. This study asks whether internal tongue motion patterns for a specific sound are similar across subjects, or whether they indicate multiple gestures. There are two variants of the sound /s/, which may produce two gestures or may represent a multitude of gestures. The first goal of this paper was to quantify internal tongue differences between these allophones in normal speakers. The second goal was to test how these differences are affected by subjects expected to have different speech gestures: normal controls and subjects who have had tongue cancer surgery. The study used tagged MRI to capture midsagittal tongue motion patterns and principal components analyses to identify patterns of variability that define subject groups and /s/ types. Results showed no motion differences between apical and laminal controls in either the tongue tip or whole tongue. These results did not support unique tongue behaviours for apical and laminal /s/. The apical patients, however, differed from all other speakers and were quite uniform as a group. They had no elevation and considerable downward/backward motion of the tongue tip. This was consistent with difficulty in maintaining the tip–blade region at the proper distance from the palate.

KW - MRI

KW - principal components

KW - speech

KW - tongue motion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981358155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981358155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21681163.2013.837841

DO - 10.1080/21681163.2013.837841

M3 - Article

C2 - 25309844

AN - SCOPUS:84981358155

VL - 2

SP - 197

EP - 207

JO - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization

JF - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization

SN - 2168-1163

IS - 4

ER -