Patterns and prognostic value of lymph node dissection for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Kai Mao, Jieqiong Liu, Jian Sun, Jianlong Zhang, Jie Chen, Timothy M. Pawlik, Lisa Jacobs, Zhiyu Xiao, Jie Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and Aim: Lymph node metastasis is a major prognostic factor for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). However, prognostic significance of extent of node dissection, lymph node ratio (LNR), and number and location of positive nodes remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether node status, LNR, or number or location of positive nodes are independent factors for staging in PHC and to determine the minimum requirements for node examination. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify 1116 resected PHCs from 1998 to 2008. The correlation between nodal status and survival was analyzed retrospectively. Results: Lymph node metastasis occurred in 43.4% patients and was an independent predictor for overall survival and cancer-specific survival. No survival benefit was observed for an increasing number of node retrieval in node-positive patients. However, in node-negative patients, ≥13 node dissection was of more survival benefit than 3≤total lymph node count (TLNC)≤12 and TLNC0.27 also had unfavorable prognosis (relative ratio: 1.376, P=0.001). Conclusions: We determined that to adequately assess nodal status of this life-threatening disease, 13 or more nodes retrieval should be considered. Number of positive nodes and LNR rather than location of metastatic nodes may be defined as parameters for staging of PHC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-426
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Klatskin Tumor
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes
Survival
Neoplasm Metastasis
Dissection
Epidemiology
Databases
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Hilar cholangiocarcinoma
  • Lymph node ratio
  • Lymph node status
  • Total lymph node count

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology

Cite this

Patterns and prognostic value of lymph node dissection for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. / Mao, Kai; Liu, Jieqiong; Sun, Jian; Zhang, Jianlong; Chen, Jie; Pawlik, Timothy M.; Jacobs, Lisa; Xiao, Zhiyu; Wang, Jie.

In: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia), Vol. 31, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 417-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mao, Kai ; Liu, Jieqiong ; Sun, Jian ; Zhang, Jianlong ; Chen, Jie ; Pawlik, Timothy M. ; Jacobs, Lisa ; Xiao, Zhiyu ; Wang, Jie. / Patterns and prognostic value of lymph node dissection for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. In: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia). 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 417-426.
@article{d7d0c333cbab483e85dea19d9ae7fa23,
title = "Patterns and prognostic value of lymph node dissection for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma",
abstract = "Background and Aim: Lymph node metastasis is a major prognostic factor for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). However, prognostic significance of extent of node dissection, lymph node ratio (LNR), and number and location of positive nodes remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether node status, LNR, or number or location of positive nodes are independent factors for staging in PHC and to determine the minimum requirements for node examination. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify 1116 resected PHCs from 1998 to 2008. The correlation between nodal status and survival was analyzed retrospectively. Results: Lymph node metastasis occurred in 43.4{\%} patients and was an independent predictor for overall survival and cancer-specific survival. No survival benefit was observed for an increasing number of node retrieval in node-positive patients. However, in node-negative patients, ≥13 node dissection was of more survival benefit than 3≤total lymph node count (TLNC)≤12 and TLNC0.27 also had unfavorable prognosis (relative ratio: 1.376, P=0.001). Conclusions: We determined that to adequately assess nodal status of this life-threatening disease, 13 or more nodes retrieval should be considered. Number of positive nodes and LNR rather than location of metastatic nodes may be defined as parameters for staging of PHC.",
keywords = "Hilar cholangiocarcinoma, Lymph node ratio, Lymph node status, Total lymph node count",
author = "Kai Mao and Jieqiong Liu and Jian Sun and Jianlong Zhang and Jie Chen and Pawlik, {Timothy M.} and Lisa Jacobs and Zhiyu Xiao and Jie Wang",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jgh.13072",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "417--426",
journal = "Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)",
issn = "0815-9319",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns and prognostic value of lymph node dissection for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

AU - Mao, Kai

AU - Liu, Jieqiong

AU - Sun, Jian

AU - Zhang, Jianlong

AU - Chen, Jie

AU - Pawlik, Timothy M.

AU - Jacobs, Lisa

AU - Xiao, Zhiyu

AU - Wang, Jie

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Background and Aim: Lymph node metastasis is a major prognostic factor for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). However, prognostic significance of extent of node dissection, lymph node ratio (LNR), and number and location of positive nodes remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether node status, LNR, or number or location of positive nodes are independent factors for staging in PHC and to determine the minimum requirements for node examination. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify 1116 resected PHCs from 1998 to 2008. The correlation between nodal status and survival was analyzed retrospectively. Results: Lymph node metastasis occurred in 43.4% patients and was an independent predictor for overall survival and cancer-specific survival. No survival benefit was observed for an increasing number of node retrieval in node-positive patients. However, in node-negative patients, ≥13 node dissection was of more survival benefit than 3≤total lymph node count (TLNC)≤12 and TLNC0.27 also had unfavorable prognosis (relative ratio: 1.376, P=0.001). Conclusions: We determined that to adequately assess nodal status of this life-threatening disease, 13 or more nodes retrieval should be considered. Number of positive nodes and LNR rather than location of metastatic nodes may be defined as parameters for staging of PHC.

AB - Background and Aim: Lymph node metastasis is a major prognostic factor for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). However, prognostic significance of extent of node dissection, lymph node ratio (LNR), and number and location of positive nodes remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether node status, LNR, or number or location of positive nodes are independent factors for staging in PHC and to determine the minimum requirements for node examination. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify 1116 resected PHCs from 1998 to 2008. The correlation between nodal status and survival was analyzed retrospectively. Results: Lymph node metastasis occurred in 43.4% patients and was an independent predictor for overall survival and cancer-specific survival. No survival benefit was observed for an increasing number of node retrieval in node-positive patients. However, in node-negative patients, ≥13 node dissection was of more survival benefit than 3≤total lymph node count (TLNC)≤12 and TLNC0.27 also had unfavorable prognosis (relative ratio: 1.376, P=0.001). Conclusions: We determined that to adequately assess nodal status of this life-threatening disease, 13 or more nodes retrieval should be considered. Number of positive nodes and LNR rather than location of metastatic nodes may be defined as parameters for staging of PHC.

KW - Hilar cholangiocarcinoma

KW - Lymph node ratio

KW - Lymph node status

KW - Total lymph node count

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955562426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955562426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jgh.13072

DO - 10.1111/jgh.13072

M3 - Article

C2 - 26250532

AN - SCOPUS:84955562426

VL - 31

SP - 417

EP - 426

JO - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

JF - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

SN - 0815-9319

IS - 2

ER -