Patients' perceptions of the value of current vision: Assessment of preference values among patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization - The submacular surgery trials vision preference value scale. SST report no. 6

Eric B. Bass, Marta J. Marsh, Carol M. Mangione, Neil M. Bressler, Ashley L. Childs, Li Ming Dong, Barbara S. Hawkins, Harris A. Jaffee, Päivi H. Miskala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To improve understanding and awareness of the impact of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) on health-related quality of life, we sought to measure the preference value that patients with subfoveal CNV assigned to their health and vision status. Patients and Methods: Patients with subfoveal CNV completed telephone interviews about their quality of life prior to enrollment and random treatment assignment in the Submacular Surgery Trials, a set of multicenter randomized controlled trials evaluating outcomes of submacular surgery compared with observation. The interviewers asked patients to rate their current vision on a scale from 0 (completely blind) to 100 (perfect vision). The interviewers also asked them to rate complete blindness and then perfect vision, assuming their health otherwise was the same as it was at the time of the interview, on a scale from 0 (dead) to 100 (perfect health with perfect vision). Scores were converted to a 0 to 1 preference value scale for health and vision status, where 0 represents death and 1 represents perfect health and vision. Results: Of 1015 participants enrolled in the Submacular Surgery Trials, 996 completed interviews that included the rating questions, and 792 (80%) answered all 3 rating questions in a manner permitting calculation of a single overall preference value for their current health and vision status on a scale from 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect). The mean preference value was 0.64 (median, 0.68; interquartile range, 0.51-0.80). The preference values correlated with age (Pearson correlation coefficient, -0.11; P=.002), patients' self-rated perception of overall health (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.36; P<.001), and self-reported perception of vision (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.47; P<.001). The preference values were significantly lower with poorer visual acuity in the better eye and greater evidence of dysfunction on either the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale or the Physical or Mental Component Summary scales of the Short Form-36 Health Survey but did not differ significantly by gender or other baseline characteristics such as race, treatment assignment, or size of the CNV lesion. Conclusions: Vision loss from subfoveal CNV is associated with patient preference values that are as low as or lower than values previously reported for other serious medical conditions such as dialysis-dependent renal failure and AIDS, indicating that both unilateral and bilateral CNV have a profound impact on how patients feel about their overall health-related quality of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1856-1867
Number of pages12
JournalArchives of ophthalmology
Volume122
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Patients' perceptions of the value of current vision: Assessment of preference values among patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization - The submacular surgery trials vision preference value scale. SST report no. 6'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this