Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings

A study of survivors of sudden cardiac death

Neal W. Dickert, Nancy E Kass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Conditions such as stroke, sudden cardiac death, and major traumatic injury are major causes of morbidity and mortality, and there is a need for clinical research to improve treatment for these conditions. However, because informed consent is often impossible, research in these situations poses ethical concerns. Despite growing literature on the ethics of emergency research, little is known about the views of relevant patient populations regarding research in emergency settings conducted under an exception from informed consent (EFIC). In this qualitative study, survivors of sudden cardiac death (SCD) - recruited from an outpatient cardiology clinic in late 2005 - were asked their views on scenarios representing different types of EFIC research. Patients were generally accepting of such research, more than previous studies would have predicted. Their concerns focused primarily on study risks and benefits and less on waiving consent or randomization. EFIC research is of international importance and ethical controversy. This study represents the first attempt to assess views of SCD survivors on this type of research and one of the first to assess patients' views in-depth. Findings indicate broad acceptance of EFIC research among this population and re-focus discussion on what risks are reasonable for non-autonomous subjects. The study also demonstrates potential for valuable input from patients regarding complicated and ethically challenging issues using a method that allows them to develop opinions on unfamiliar issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-191
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Sudden Cardiac Death
Survivors
Emergencies
death
Informed Consent
Research
Research Ethics
Emergency
outpatient clinic
Random Allocation
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Cardiology
Population
stroke
morbidity
Stroke
mortality
acceptance
Morbidity
moral philosophy

Keywords

  • Bioethics
  • Emergency research
  • Informed consent
  • Research ethics
  • Sudden cardiac death

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings : A study of survivors of sudden cardiac death. / Dickert, Neal W.; Kass, Nancy E.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 68, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 183-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a959f14299d2440fafaa262f1c84ac7e,
title = "Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings: A study of survivors of sudden cardiac death",
abstract = "Conditions such as stroke, sudden cardiac death, and major traumatic injury are major causes of morbidity and mortality, and there is a need for clinical research to improve treatment for these conditions. However, because informed consent is often impossible, research in these situations poses ethical concerns. Despite growing literature on the ethics of emergency research, little is known about the views of relevant patient populations regarding research in emergency settings conducted under an exception from informed consent (EFIC). In this qualitative study, survivors of sudden cardiac death (SCD) - recruited from an outpatient cardiology clinic in late 2005 - were asked their views on scenarios representing different types of EFIC research. Patients were generally accepting of such research, more than previous studies would have predicted. Their concerns focused primarily on study risks and benefits and less on waiving consent or randomization. EFIC research is of international importance and ethical controversy. This study represents the first attempt to assess views of SCD survivors on this type of research and one of the first to assess patients' views in-depth. Findings indicate broad acceptance of EFIC research among this population and re-focus discussion on what risks are reasonable for non-autonomous subjects. The study also demonstrates potential for valuable input from patients regarding complicated and ethically challenging issues using a method that allows them to develop opinions on unfamiliar issues.",
keywords = "Bioethics, Emergency research, Informed consent, Research ethics, Sudden cardiac death",
author = "Dickert, {Neal W.} and Kass, {Nancy E}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "183--191",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings

T2 - A study of survivors of sudden cardiac death

AU - Dickert, Neal W.

AU - Kass, Nancy E

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Conditions such as stroke, sudden cardiac death, and major traumatic injury are major causes of morbidity and mortality, and there is a need for clinical research to improve treatment for these conditions. However, because informed consent is often impossible, research in these situations poses ethical concerns. Despite growing literature on the ethics of emergency research, little is known about the views of relevant patient populations regarding research in emergency settings conducted under an exception from informed consent (EFIC). In this qualitative study, survivors of sudden cardiac death (SCD) - recruited from an outpatient cardiology clinic in late 2005 - were asked their views on scenarios representing different types of EFIC research. Patients were generally accepting of such research, more than previous studies would have predicted. Their concerns focused primarily on study risks and benefits and less on waiving consent or randomization. EFIC research is of international importance and ethical controversy. This study represents the first attempt to assess views of SCD survivors on this type of research and one of the first to assess patients' views in-depth. Findings indicate broad acceptance of EFIC research among this population and re-focus discussion on what risks are reasonable for non-autonomous subjects. The study also demonstrates potential for valuable input from patients regarding complicated and ethically challenging issues using a method that allows them to develop opinions on unfamiliar issues.

AB - Conditions such as stroke, sudden cardiac death, and major traumatic injury are major causes of morbidity and mortality, and there is a need for clinical research to improve treatment for these conditions. However, because informed consent is often impossible, research in these situations poses ethical concerns. Despite growing literature on the ethics of emergency research, little is known about the views of relevant patient populations regarding research in emergency settings conducted under an exception from informed consent (EFIC). In this qualitative study, survivors of sudden cardiac death (SCD) - recruited from an outpatient cardiology clinic in late 2005 - were asked their views on scenarios representing different types of EFIC research. Patients were generally accepting of such research, more than previous studies would have predicted. Their concerns focused primarily on study risks and benefits and less on waiving consent or randomization. EFIC research is of international importance and ethical controversy. This study represents the first attempt to assess views of SCD survivors on this type of research and one of the first to assess patients' views in-depth. Findings indicate broad acceptance of EFIC research among this population and re-focus discussion on what risks are reasonable for non-autonomous subjects. The study also demonstrates potential for valuable input from patients regarding complicated and ethically challenging issues using a method that allows them to develop opinions on unfamiliar issues.

KW - Bioethics

KW - Emergency research

KW - Informed consent

KW - Research ethics

KW - Sudden cardiac death

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57649091501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57649091501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.001

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 183

EP - 191

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 1

ER -