Patients’ and nephrologists’ evaluation of patient-facing smartphone apps for CKD

Karandeep Singh, Clarissa J. Diamantidis, Shreyas Ramani, Nrupen A. Bhavsar, Peter Mara, Julia Warner, Jorge Rodriguez, Tianshi Wang, Julie Wright-Nunes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and objectives Many aspects of CKD management rely heavily on patient self-care, including medication and dietary adherence, self-monitoring of BP, and daily physical activity.Growing evidence suggests that incorporating smartphone-based applications can support self-care in CKD and chronic disease more generally. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We identified applications targeting patients with CKD by conducting a search of the US Apple App Store (iOS) and Google Play Store (Android) using the following four phrases: “kidneydisease,”“renal,”“dialysis,” and”kidney transplant.“Weconsidered thefirst 50 applications for each search term on each application store. We adapted a previously described framework for assessment of mobile health applications to account forkidneydisease-specific content areas andevaluatedapplications on their types of patient engagement, quality, usability, and safety. Engagement and quality were assessed by both a patient and a nephrologist, usabilitywas assessed by a patient, and safetywas assessed by a nephrologist.Overall, two patients with CKD and three nephrologists performed the evaluations.We examined pairwise correlations between patient, nephrologist, and consumer ratings of application quality. Results Our search strategy identified 174 unique applications on Android and 165 unique applications on iOS. After excluding applications thatwere not related to kidney disease,were not patient facing, orwere last updated before 2014, 12 Android-only applications, 11 iOS-only applications, and five dual-platform applications remained. Patient and nephrologist application quality ratings, assessed by the net promoter score, were not correlated (r=0.36; P=0.06). Consumer ratings on the application stores did not correlate with patient ratings of application quality (r=0.34; P=0.18). Conclusions Only a small subset of CKD applications was highly rated by both patients and nephrologists. Patients’ impressions of application quality are not directly linkedto consumer application ratings or nephrologist impressions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-529
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 5 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Nephrology
  • Transplantation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Patients’ and nephrologists’ evaluation of patient-facing smartphone apps for CKD'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this