Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Infections in the Acute Care Setting

David A. Broniatowski, Eili Klein, Larissa May, Elena M. Martinez, Chelsea Ware, Valerie F. Reyna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reducing inappropriate prescribing is key to mitigating antibiotic resistance, particularly in acute care settings. Clinicians’ prescribing decisions are influenced by their judgments and actual or perceived patient expectations. Fuzzy trace theory predicts that patients and clinicians base such decisions on categorical gist representations that reflect the bottom-line understanding of information about antibiotics. However, due to clinicians’ specialized training, the categorical gists driving clinicians’ and patients’ decisions might differ, which could result in mismatched expectations and inefficiencies in targeting interventions. We surveyed clinicians and patients from 2 large urban academic hospital emergency departments (EDs) and a sample of nonpatient subjects regarding their gist representations of antibiotic decisions, as well as relevant knowledge and expectations. Results were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and multifactor regression. In total, 149 clinicians (47% female; 74% white), 519 online subjects (45% female; 78% white), and 225 ED patients (61% female; 56% black) completed the survey. While clinicians demonstrated greater knowledge of antibiotics and concern about side effects than patients, the predominant categorical gist for both patients and clinicians was “why not take a risk,” which compares the status quo of remaining sick to the possibility of benefit from antibiotics. This gist also predicted expectations and prior prescribing in the nonpatient sample. Other representations reflected the gist that “germs are germs” conflating bacteria and viruses, as well as perceptions of side effects and efficacy. Although individually rational, reliance on the “why not take a risk” representation can lead to socially suboptimal results, including antibiotic resistance and individual patient harm due to adverse events. Changing this representation could alter clinicians’ and patients’ expectations, suggesting opportunities to reduce overprescribing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)547-561
Number of pages15
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Respiratory Tract Infections
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Microbial Drug Resistance
Hospital Emergency Service
Inappropriate Prescribing
Patient Harm
Urban Hospitals
Hospital Departments
Statistical Factor Analysis
Viruses
Bacteria

Keywords

  • antimicrobial resistance
  • framing
  • fuzzy trace theory
  • gist
  • risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Infections in the Acute Care Setting. / Broniatowski, David A.; Klein, Eili; May, Larissa; Martinez, Elena M.; Ware, Chelsea; Reyna, Valerie F.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 38, No. 5, 01.07.2018, p. 547-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Broniatowski, David A. ; Klein, Eili ; May, Larissa ; Martinez, Elena M. ; Ware, Chelsea ; Reyna, Valerie F. / Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Infections in the Acute Care Setting. In: Medical Decision Making. 2018 ; Vol. 38, No. 5. pp. 547-561.
@article{965ef1ed818741b9aa84dcd59457a4d4,
title = "Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Infections in the Acute Care Setting",
abstract = "Reducing inappropriate prescribing is key to mitigating antibiotic resistance, particularly in acute care settings. Clinicians’ prescribing decisions are influenced by their judgments and actual or perceived patient expectations. Fuzzy trace theory predicts that patients and clinicians base such decisions on categorical gist representations that reflect the bottom-line understanding of information about antibiotics. However, due to clinicians’ specialized training, the categorical gists driving clinicians’ and patients’ decisions might differ, which could result in mismatched expectations and inefficiencies in targeting interventions. We surveyed clinicians and patients from 2 large urban academic hospital emergency departments (EDs) and a sample of nonpatient subjects regarding their gist representations of antibiotic decisions, as well as relevant knowledge and expectations. Results were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and multifactor regression. In total, 149 clinicians (47{\%} female; 74{\%} white), 519 online subjects (45{\%} female; 78{\%} white), and 225 ED patients (61{\%} female; 56{\%} black) completed the survey. While clinicians demonstrated greater knowledge of antibiotics and concern about side effects than patients, the predominant categorical gist for both patients and clinicians was “why not take a risk,” which compares the status quo of remaining sick to the possibility of benefit from antibiotics. This gist also predicted expectations and prior prescribing in the nonpatient sample. Other representations reflected the gist that “germs are germs” conflating bacteria and viruses, as well as perceptions of side effects and efficacy. Although individually rational, reliance on the “why not take a risk” representation can lead to socially suboptimal results, including antibiotic resistance and individual patient harm due to adverse events. Changing this representation could alter clinicians’ and patients’ expectations, suggesting opportunities to reduce overprescribing.",
keywords = "antimicrobial resistance, framing, fuzzy trace theory, gist, risk",
author = "Broniatowski, {David A.} and Eili Klein and Larissa May and Martinez, {Elena M.} and Chelsea Ware and Reyna, {Valerie F.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X18770664",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "547--561",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients’ and Clinicians’ Perceptions of Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Infections in the Acute Care Setting

AU - Broniatowski, David A.

AU - Klein, Eili

AU - May, Larissa

AU - Martinez, Elena M.

AU - Ware, Chelsea

AU - Reyna, Valerie F.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Reducing inappropriate prescribing is key to mitigating antibiotic resistance, particularly in acute care settings. Clinicians’ prescribing decisions are influenced by their judgments and actual or perceived patient expectations. Fuzzy trace theory predicts that patients and clinicians base such decisions on categorical gist representations that reflect the bottom-line understanding of information about antibiotics. However, due to clinicians’ specialized training, the categorical gists driving clinicians’ and patients’ decisions might differ, which could result in mismatched expectations and inefficiencies in targeting interventions. We surveyed clinicians and patients from 2 large urban academic hospital emergency departments (EDs) and a sample of nonpatient subjects regarding their gist representations of antibiotic decisions, as well as relevant knowledge and expectations. Results were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and multifactor regression. In total, 149 clinicians (47% female; 74% white), 519 online subjects (45% female; 78% white), and 225 ED patients (61% female; 56% black) completed the survey. While clinicians demonstrated greater knowledge of antibiotics and concern about side effects than patients, the predominant categorical gist for both patients and clinicians was “why not take a risk,” which compares the status quo of remaining sick to the possibility of benefit from antibiotics. This gist also predicted expectations and prior prescribing in the nonpatient sample. Other representations reflected the gist that “germs are germs” conflating bacteria and viruses, as well as perceptions of side effects and efficacy. Although individually rational, reliance on the “why not take a risk” representation can lead to socially suboptimal results, including antibiotic resistance and individual patient harm due to adverse events. Changing this representation could alter clinicians’ and patients’ expectations, suggesting opportunities to reduce overprescribing.

AB - Reducing inappropriate prescribing is key to mitigating antibiotic resistance, particularly in acute care settings. Clinicians’ prescribing decisions are influenced by their judgments and actual or perceived patient expectations. Fuzzy trace theory predicts that patients and clinicians base such decisions on categorical gist representations that reflect the bottom-line understanding of information about antibiotics. However, due to clinicians’ specialized training, the categorical gists driving clinicians’ and patients’ decisions might differ, which could result in mismatched expectations and inefficiencies in targeting interventions. We surveyed clinicians and patients from 2 large urban academic hospital emergency departments (EDs) and a sample of nonpatient subjects regarding their gist representations of antibiotic decisions, as well as relevant knowledge and expectations. Results were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and multifactor regression. In total, 149 clinicians (47% female; 74% white), 519 online subjects (45% female; 78% white), and 225 ED patients (61% female; 56% black) completed the survey. While clinicians demonstrated greater knowledge of antibiotics and concern about side effects than patients, the predominant categorical gist for both patients and clinicians was “why not take a risk,” which compares the status quo of remaining sick to the possibility of benefit from antibiotics. This gist also predicted expectations and prior prescribing in the nonpatient sample. Other representations reflected the gist that “germs are germs” conflating bacteria and viruses, as well as perceptions of side effects and efficacy. Although individually rational, reliance on the “why not take a risk” representation can lead to socially suboptimal results, including antibiotic resistance and individual patient harm due to adverse events. Changing this representation could alter clinicians’ and patients’ expectations, suggesting opportunities to reduce overprescribing.

KW - antimicrobial resistance

KW - framing

KW - fuzzy trace theory

KW - gist

KW - risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047955716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047955716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X18770664

DO - 10.1177/0272989X18770664

M3 - Article

C2 - 29847253

AN - SCOPUS:85047955716

VL - 38

SP - 547

EP - 561

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 5

ER -