Patient sharing and quality of care measuring outcomes of care coordination using claims data

Craig Pollack, Klaus W. Lemke, Eric Roberts, Jonathan Weiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: With the goal of improving clinical efficiency and effectiveness, programs to enhance care coordination are a major focus of health care reform. Objective: To examine whether "care density"-a claims-based measure of patient sharing by office-based physicians-is associated with measures of quality. Care density is a proxy measure that may reflect how frequently a patient's doctors collaborate. Research Design: Cohort study using administrative databases from 3 large commercial insurance plans. Subjects: A total of 1.7 million adult patients; 31,675 with congestive heart failure, 78,530 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 240,378 with diabetes. Measures: Care density was assessed in 2008. Prevention Quality Indicators (PQIs), 30-day readmissions, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set quality indicators were measured in the following year. Results: Among all patients, we found that patients with the highest care density density-indicating high levels of patient sharing among their office-based physicians-had significantly lower rates of adverse events measured as PQIs compared with patients with low-care density (odds ratio = 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.92). A significant association between care density and PQIs was also observed for patients with diabetes mellitus but not congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Diabetic patients with higher care density scores had significantly lower odds of 30-day readmissions (odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.97). Significant associations were observed between care density and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures although not always in the expected direction. Conclusion: In some settings, patients whose doctors share more patients had lower odds of adverse events and 30-day readmissions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-323
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Care
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 30 2015

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Physicians' Offices
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Heart Failure
Odds Ratio
Organizational Efficiency
Confidence Intervals
Delivery of Health Care
Health Care Reform
Proxy
Insurance
Diabetes Mellitus
Cohort Studies
Research Design
Databases

Keywords

  • care coordination
  • care density
  • performance measure
  • provider social networks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Patient sharing and quality of care measuring outcomes of care coordination using claims data. / Pollack, Craig; Lemke, Klaus W.; Roberts, Eric; Weiner, Jonathan.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 53, No. 4, 30.03.2015, p. 317-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e0ac439041a549e6b37182c778f54c0e,
title = "Patient sharing and quality of care measuring outcomes of care coordination using claims data",
abstract = "Background: With the goal of improving clinical efficiency and effectiveness, programs to enhance care coordination are a major focus of health care reform. Objective: To examine whether {"}care density{"}-a claims-based measure of patient sharing by office-based physicians-is associated with measures of quality. Care density is a proxy measure that may reflect how frequently a patient's doctors collaborate. Research Design: Cohort study using administrative databases from 3 large commercial insurance plans. Subjects: A total of 1.7 million adult patients; 31,675 with congestive heart failure, 78,530 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 240,378 with diabetes. Measures: Care density was assessed in 2008. Prevention Quality Indicators (PQIs), 30-day readmissions, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set quality indicators were measured in the following year. Results: Among all patients, we found that patients with the highest care density density-indicating high levels of patient sharing among their office-based physicians-had significantly lower rates of adverse events measured as PQIs compared with patients with low-care density (odds ratio = 0.88; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.85-0.92). A significant association between care density and PQIs was also observed for patients with diabetes mellitus but not congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Diabetic patients with higher care density scores had significantly lower odds of 30-day readmissions (odds ratio = 0.68, 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.48-0.97). Significant associations were observed between care density and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures although not always in the expected direction. Conclusion: In some settings, patients whose doctors share more patients had lower odds of adverse events and 30-day readmissions.",
keywords = "care coordination, care density, performance measure, provider social networks",
author = "Craig Pollack and Lemke, {Klaus W.} and Eric Roberts and Jonathan Weiner",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0000000000000319",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "317--323",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient sharing and quality of care measuring outcomes of care coordination using claims data

AU - Pollack, Craig

AU - Lemke, Klaus W.

AU - Roberts, Eric

AU - Weiner, Jonathan

PY - 2015/3/30

Y1 - 2015/3/30

N2 - Background: With the goal of improving clinical efficiency and effectiveness, programs to enhance care coordination are a major focus of health care reform. Objective: To examine whether "care density"-a claims-based measure of patient sharing by office-based physicians-is associated with measures of quality. Care density is a proxy measure that may reflect how frequently a patient's doctors collaborate. Research Design: Cohort study using administrative databases from 3 large commercial insurance plans. Subjects: A total of 1.7 million adult patients; 31,675 with congestive heart failure, 78,530 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 240,378 with diabetes. Measures: Care density was assessed in 2008. Prevention Quality Indicators (PQIs), 30-day readmissions, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set quality indicators were measured in the following year. Results: Among all patients, we found that patients with the highest care density density-indicating high levels of patient sharing among their office-based physicians-had significantly lower rates of adverse events measured as PQIs compared with patients with low-care density (odds ratio = 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.92). A significant association between care density and PQIs was also observed for patients with diabetes mellitus but not congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Diabetic patients with higher care density scores had significantly lower odds of 30-day readmissions (odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.97). Significant associations were observed between care density and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures although not always in the expected direction. Conclusion: In some settings, patients whose doctors share more patients had lower odds of adverse events and 30-day readmissions.

AB - Background: With the goal of improving clinical efficiency and effectiveness, programs to enhance care coordination are a major focus of health care reform. Objective: To examine whether "care density"-a claims-based measure of patient sharing by office-based physicians-is associated with measures of quality. Care density is a proxy measure that may reflect how frequently a patient's doctors collaborate. Research Design: Cohort study using administrative databases from 3 large commercial insurance plans. Subjects: A total of 1.7 million adult patients; 31,675 with congestive heart failure, 78,530 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 240,378 with diabetes. Measures: Care density was assessed in 2008. Prevention Quality Indicators (PQIs), 30-day readmissions, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set quality indicators were measured in the following year. Results: Among all patients, we found that patients with the highest care density density-indicating high levels of patient sharing among their office-based physicians-had significantly lower rates of adverse events measured as PQIs compared with patients with low-care density (odds ratio = 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.92). A significant association between care density and PQIs was also observed for patients with diabetes mellitus but not congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Diabetic patients with higher care density scores had significantly lower odds of 30-day readmissions (odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.97). Significant associations were observed between care density and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures although not always in the expected direction. Conclusion: In some settings, patients whose doctors share more patients had lower odds of adverse events and 30-day readmissions.

KW - care coordination

KW - care density

KW - performance measure

KW - provider social networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925942986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925942986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000319

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000319

M3 - Article

C2 - 25719430

AN - SCOPUS:84925942986

VL - 53

SP - 317

EP - 323

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 4

ER -