Patient safety perceptions of primary care providers after implementation of an electronic medical record system

Maura Mcguire, Gary Noronha, Lipika Samal, Hsin Chieh Yeh, Susan Crocetti, Steven J Kravet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing the use of electronic medical records (EMR) has been suggested as an important strategy for improving healthcare safety. OBJECTIVE: To sequentially measure, evaluate, and respond to safety culture and practice safety concerns following EMR implementation. DESIGN: Safety culture was assessed using a validated tool (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire; SAQ), immediately following EMR implementation (T1) and at 1.5 (T2) and 2.5 (T3) years post-implementation. The SAQ was supplemented with a practice-specific assessment tool to identify safety needs and barriers. PARTICIPANTS: A large medical group practice with a primary care core of 17-18 practices, staffed by clinicians in family medicine, pediatrics, internal medicine. INTERVENTIONS: Survey results were used to define and respond to areas of need between assessments with system changes and educational programs. MAIN MEASURES: Change in safety culture over time; perceived impact of EMR on practice. KEY RESULTS: Responses were received from 103 of 123 primary care providers in T1 (83.7 % response rate), 122 of 143 in T2 (85.3 %) and 142 of 181 in T3 (78.5 %). Safety culture improved over this period, with statistically significant improvement in all domains except for stress recognition. Time constraints, communications and patient adherence were perceived to be the most important safety issues. The majority of respondents in both T2 (77.9 %) and T3 (85.4 %) surveys agreed that the EMR improved their ability to provide care more safely. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an EMR in a large primary care practice required redesign of many organizational processes, and was associated with improvements in safety culture. Most primary care providers agreed that the EMR allowed them to provide care more safely.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-192
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Patient Safety
Safety Management
Primary Health Care
Safety
Group Practice
Aptitude
Needs Assessment
Patient Compliance
Internal Medicine
Communication
Medicine
Pediatrics
Delivery of Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • electronic medical records
  • EMR
  • primary care
  • safety attitudes questionnaire
  • safety culture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Patient safety perceptions of primary care providers after implementation of an electronic medical record system. / Mcguire, Maura; Noronha, Gary; Samal, Lipika; Yeh, Hsin Chieh; Crocetti, Susan; Kravet, Steven J.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 184-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{410495cbbf2c47bc85f260012fb0e3f5,
title = "Patient safety perceptions of primary care providers after implementation of an electronic medical record system",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Increasing the use of electronic medical records (EMR) has been suggested as an important strategy for improving healthcare safety. OBJECTIVE: To sequentially measure, evaluate, and respond to safety culture and practice safety concerns following EMR implementation. DESIGN: Safety culture was assessed using a validated tool (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire; SAQ), immediately following EMR implementation (T1) and at 1.5 (T2) and 2.5 (T3) years post-implementation. The SAQ was supplemented with a practice-specific assessment tool to identify safety needs and barriers. PARTICIPANTS: A large medical group practice with a primary care core of 17-18 practices, staffed by clinicians in family medicine, pediatrics, internal medicine. INTERVENTIONS: Survey results were used to define and respond to areas of need between assessments with system changes and educational programs. MAIN MEASURES: Change in safety culture over time; perceived impact of EMR on practice. KEY RESULTS: Responses were received from 103 of 123 primary care providers in T1 (83.7 {\%} response rate), 122 of 143 in T2 (85.3 {\%}) and 142 of 181 in T3 (78.5 {\%}). Safety culture improved over this period, with statistically significant improvement in all domains except for stress recognition. Time constraints, communications and patient adherence were perceived to be the most important safety issues. The majority of respondents in both T2 (77.9 {\%}) and T3 (85.4 {\%}) surveys agreed that the EMR improved their ability to provide care more safely. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an EMR in a large primary care practice required redesign of many organizational processes, and was associated with improvements in safety culture. Most primary care providers agreed that the EMR allowed them to provide care more safely.",
keywords = "electronic medical records, EMR, primary care, safety attitudes questionnaire, safety culture",
author = "Maura Mcguire and Gary Noronha and Lipika Samal and Yeh, {Hsin Chieh} and Susan Crocetti and Kravet, {Steven J}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-012-2153-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "184--192",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient safety perceptions of primary care providers after implementation of an electronic medical record system

AU - Mcguire, Maura

AU - Noronha, Gary

AU - Samal, Lipika

AU - Yeh, Hsin Chieh

AU - Crocetti, Susan

AU - Kravet, Steven J

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - BACKGROUND: Increasing the use of electronic medical records (EMR) has been suggested as an important strategy for improving healthcare safety. OBJECTIVE: To sequentially measure, evaluate, and respond to safety culture and practice safety concerns following EMR implementation. DESIGN: Safety culture was assessed using a validated tool (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire; SAQ), immediately following EMR implementation (T1) and at 1.5 (T2) and 2.5 (T3) years post-implementation. The SAQ was supplemented with a practice-specific assessment tool to identify safety needs and barriers. PARTICIPANTS: A large medical group practice with a primary care core of 17-18 practices, staffed by clinicians in family medicine, pediatrics, internal medicine. INTERVENTIONS: Survey results were used to define and respond to areas of need between assessments with system changes and educational programs. MAIN MEASURES: Change in safety culture over time; perceived impact of EMR on practice. KEY RESULTS: Responses were received from 103 of 123 primary care providers in T1 (83.7 % response rate), 122 of 143 in T2 (85.3 %) and 142 of 181 in T3 (78.5 %). Safety culture improved over this period, with statistically significant improvement in all domains except for stress recognition. Time constraints, communications and patient adherence were perceived to be the most important safety issues. The majority of respondents in both T2 (77.9 %) and T3 (85.4 %) surveys agreed that the EMR improved their ability to provide care more safely. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an EMR in a large primary care practice required redesign of many organizational processes, and was associated with improvements in safety culture. Most primary care providers agreed that the EMR allowed them to provide care more safely.

AB - BACKGROUND: Increasing the use of electronic medical records (EMR) has been suggested as an important strategy for improving healthcare safety. OBJECTIVE: To sequentially measure, evaluate, and respond to safety culture and practice safety concerns following EMR implementation. DESIGN: Safety culture was assessed using a validated tool (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire; SAQ), immediately following EMR implementation (T1) and at 1.5 (T2) and 2.5 (T3) years post-implementation. The SAQ was supplemented with a practice-specific assessment tool to identify safety needs and barriers. PARTICIPANTS: A large medical group practice with a primary care core of 17-18 practices, staffed by clinicians in family medicine, pediatrics, internal medicine. INTERVENTIONS: Survey results were used to define and respond to areas of need between assessments with system changes and educational programs. MAIN MEASURES: Change in safety culture over time; perceived impact of EMR on practice. KEY RESULTS: Responses were received from 103 of 123 primary care providers in T1 (83.7 % response rate), 122 of 143 in T2 (85.3 %) and 142 of 181 in T3 (78.5 %). Safety culture improved over this period, with statistically significant improvement in all domains except for stress recognition. Time constraints, communications and patient adherence were perceived to be the most important safety issues. The majority of respondents in both T2 (77.9 %) and T3 (85.4 %) surveys agreed that the EMR improved their ability to provide care more safely. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an EMR in a large primary care practice required redesign of many organizational processes, and was associated with improvements in safety culture. Most primary care providers agreed that the EMR allowed them to provide care more safely.

KW - electronic medical records

KW - EMR

KW - primary care

KW - safety attitudes questionnaire

KW - safety culture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873449127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873449127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-012-2153-y

DO - 10.1007/s11606-012-2153-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 22887020

AN - SCOPUS:84873449127

VL - 28

SP - 184

EP - 192

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 2

ER -