Patient safety in the intensive care unit

Jose M. Rodriguez-Paz, Todd Dorman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In a 1999 report on patient safety, the Institute of Medicine estimated that as many as 100,000 patients died of medical errors of commission in the United States, with a cost of over $50 billion per year. Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are thought to be particularly at risk for errors. Published reports estimate that 1.7 errors per patient per day occur in the ICU, with 148,000 life-threatening errors predicted annually in ICUs in teaching hospitals alone. Despite the publicity generated by the Institute of Medicine report and all of the efforts made to improve patient safety, some questions remain regarding the empiric evidence that safety has been improved, especially in the ICU. Healthcare has suffered from lapses in quality and safety because, unlike other industries, the delivery and organization of healthcare has historically not been viewed as a science. A new approach for improving safety in the ICU, which includes safety tools (eg, daily goal sheet, critical care bundles, a comprehensive unit-based safety program) and a framework for measuring safety in the ICU has recently been implemented and tested. The initial results of this approach show potential for improving safety in critically ill patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-34
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Pulmonary Medicine
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Intensive Care Units
Safety
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Patient Care Bundles
Delivery of Health Care
Medical Errors
Critical Care
Critical Illness
Teaching Hospitals
Industry
Organizations
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Critically ill
  • Patient safety
  • Quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Patient safety in the intensive care unit. / Rodriguez-Paz, Jose M.; Dorman, Todd.

In: Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 24-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rodriguez-Paz, Jose M. ; Dorman, Todd. / Patient safety in the intensive care unit. In: Clinical Pulmonary Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 24-34.
@article{61774fbb606a4e72a420b3df4614fc3e,
title = "Patient safety in the intensive care unit",
abstract = "In a 1999 report on patient safety, the Institute of Medicine estimated that as many as 100,000 patients died of medical errors of commission in the United States, with a cost of over $50 billion per year. Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are thought to be particularly at risk for errors. Published reports estimate that 1.7 errors per patient per day occur in the ICU, with 148,000 life-threatening errors predicted annually in ICUs in teaching hospitals alone. Despite the publicity generated by the Institute of Medicine report and all of the efforts made to improve patient safety, some questions remain regarding the empiric evidence that safety has been improved, especially in the ICU. Healthcare has suffered from lapses in quality and safety because, unlike other industries, the delivery and organization of healthcare has historically not been viewed as a science. A new approach for improving safety in the ICU, which includes safety tools (eg, daily goal sheet, critical care bundles, a comprehensive unit-based safety program) and a framework for measuring safety in the ICU has recently been implemented and tested. The initial results of this approach show potential for improving safety in critically ill patients.",
keywords = "Critically ill, Patient safety, Quality",
author = "Rodriguez-Paz, {Jose M.} and Todd Dorman",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CPM.0b013e318160edd3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "24--34",
journal = "Clinical Pulmonary Medicine",
issn = "1068-0640",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient safety in the intensive care unit

AU - Rodriguez-Paz, Jose M.

AU - Dorman, Todd

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - In a 1999 report on patient safety, the Institute of Medicine estimated that as many as 100,000 patients died of medical errors of commission in the United States, with a cost of over $50 billion per year. Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are thought to be particularly at risk for errors. Published reports estimate that 1.7 errors per patient per day occur in the ICU, with 148,000 life-threatening errors predicted annually in ICUs in teaching hospitals alone. Despite the publicity generated by the Institute of Medicine report and all of the efforts made to improve patient safety, some questions remain regarding the empiric evidence that safety has been improved, especially in the ICU. Healthcare has suffered from lapses in quality and safety because, unlike other industries, the delivery and organization of healthcare has historically not been viewed as a science. A new approach for improving safety in the ICU, which includes safety tools (eg, daily goal sheet, critical care bundles, a comprehensive unit-based safety program) and a framework for measuring safety in the ICU has recently been implemented and tested. The initial results of this approach show potential for improving safety in critically ill patients.

AB - In a 1999 report on patient safety, the Institute of Medicine estimated that as many as 100,000 patients died of medical errors of commission in the United States, with a cost of over $50 billion per year. Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are thought to be particularly at risk for errors. Published reports estimate that 1.7 errors per patient per day occur in the ICU, with 148,000 life-threatening errors predicted annually in ICUs in teaching hospitals alone. Despite the publicity generated by the Institute of Medicine report and all of the efforts made to improve patient safety, some questions remain regarding the empiric evidence that safety has been improved, especially in the ICU. Healthcare has suffered from lapses in quality and safety because, unlike other industries, the delivery and organization of healthcare has historically not been viewed as a science. A new approach for improving safety in the ICU, which includes safety tools (eg, daily goal sheet, critical care bundles, a comprehensive unit-based safety program) and a framework for measuring safety in the ICU has recently been implemented and tested. The initial results of this approach show potential for improving safety in critically ill patients.

KW - Critically ill

KW - Patient safety

KW - Quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149006946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149006946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CPM.0b013e318160edd3

DO - 10.1097/CPM.0b013e318160edd3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38149006946

VL - 15

SP - 24

EP - 34

JO - Clinical Pulmonary Medicine

JF - Clinical Pulmonary Medicine

SN - 1068-0640

IS - 1

ER -