Patient safety and outcomes from live case demonstrations of interventional cardiology procedures

Shiran Eliyahu, Ariel Roguin, Arthur Kerner, Monther Boulos, Avraham Lorber, Majdi Halabi, Mahmoud Suleiman, Eugenia Nikolsky, Shmuel Rispler, Rafael Beyar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to examine the safety and results of interventional procedures performed during the broadcast of live case demonstrations. Background: Professional meetings using live case demonstrations to present cutting-edge technology are considered a valuable educational resource. There is an ongoing discussion on whether patients who are treated during live case demonstrations are exposed to a higher risk. Methods: Between 1998 and 2010, 101 patients were treated during live transmissions from a single center in 15 invasive-cardiology conferences. Technical success was defined as the ability to effectively perform the planned procedure without any major complication. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results: The interventional procedures included coronary (n = 66), carotid (n = 15), peripheral (n = 1), valvular (n = 2), congenital heart disease (n = 12), and complex electrophysiological mapping and ablation interventions (n = 7). In 4 cases, the intended procedure was not done. The procedure was technically successful in 95%. In 5 cases, the procedure was unsuccessful because of the inability to cross a chronic total occlusion. There were no deaths during the hospital stay, and the composite primary endpoint occurred in 2 patients: a minor stroke following an atrial fibrillation ablation and a rise in serum troponin levels after percutaneous coronary intervention. These results were no different from those of 66 matched controls who underwent procedures performed by the same operators but not as live case demonstrations (relative risk: 0.32; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 3.62, p = 0.62). Conclusions: In this consecutive series of interventional cardiology procedures that were performed by expert operators during live demonstration courses, the procedural and 30-day clinical outcomes were similar to those found in daily practice and to those that have been reported in the contemporary published data. These results suggest that broadcasting live case demonstrations in selected patients from selected centers may be safe.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-224
Number of pages10
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Cardiology
Stroke
Troponin
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Atrial Fibrillation
Heart Diseases
Length of Stay
Myocardial Infarction
Confidence Intervals
Technology
Safety
Serum

Keywords

  • education
  • interventional cardiology
  • live case demonstration
  • safety
  • stenting
  • training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Patient safety and outcomes from live case demonstrations of interventional cardiology procedures. / Eliyahu, Shiran; Roguin, Ariel; Kerner, Arthur; Boulos, Monther; Lorber, Avraham; Halabi, Majdi; Suleiman, Mahmoud; Nikolsky, Eugenia; Rispler, Shmuel; Beyar, Rafael.

In: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 5, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 215-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eliyahu, S, Roguin, A, Kerner, A, Boulos, M, Lorber, A, Halabi, M, Suleiman, M, Nikolsky, E, Rispler, S & Beyar, R 2012, 'Patient safety and outcomes from live case demonstrations of interventional cardiology procedures', JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.023
Eliyahu, Shiran ; Roguin, Ariel ; Kerner, Arthur ; Boulos, Monther ; Lorber, Avraham ; Halabi, Majdi ; Suleiman, Mahmoud ; Nikolsky, Eugenia ; Rispler, Shmuel ; Beyar, Rafael. / Patient safety and outcomes from live case demonstrations of interventional cardiology procedures. In: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 215-224.
@article{7dd3fe933cab4bc3be990018cd32f4a6,
title = "Patient safety and outcomes from live case demonstrations of interventional cardiology procedures",
abstract = "Objectives: The goal of this study was to examine the safety and results of interventional procedures performed during the broadcast of live case demonstrations. Background: Professional meetings using live case demonstrations to present cutting-edge technology are considered a valuable educational resource. There is an ongoing discussion on whether patients who are treated during live case demonstrations are exposed to a higher risk. Methods: Between 1998 and 2010, 101 patients were treated during live transmissions from a single center in 15 invasive-cardiology conferences. Technical success was defined as the ability to effectively perform the planned procedure without any major complication. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results: The interventional procedures included coronary (n = 66), carotid (n = 15), peripheral (n = 1), valvular (n = 2), congenital heart disease (n = 12), and complex electrophysiological mapping and ablation interventions (n = 7). In 4 cases, the intended procedure was not done. The procedure was technically successful in 95{\%}. In 5 cases, the procedure was unsuccessful because of the inability to cross a chronic total occlusion. There were no deaths during the hospital stay, and the composite primary endpoint occurred in 2 patients: a minor stroke following an atrial fibrillation ablation and a rise in serum troponin levels after percutaneous coronary intervention. These results were no different from those of 66 matched controls who underwent procedures performed by the same operators but not as live case demonstrations (relative risk: 0.32; 95{\%} confidence interval: 0.02 to 3.62, p = 0.62). Conclusions: In this consecutive series of interventional cardiology procedures that were performed by expert operators during live demonstration courses, the procedural and 30-day clinical outcomes were similar to those found in daily practice and to those that have been reported in the contemporary published data. These results suggest that broadcasting live case demonstrations in selected patients from selected centers may be safe.",
keywords = "education, interventional cardiology, live case demonstration, safety, stenting, training",
author = "Shiran Eliyahu and Ariel Roguin and Arthur Kerner and Monther Boulos and Avraham Lorber and Majdi Halabi and Mahmoud Suleiman and Eugenia Nikolsky and Shmuel Rispler and Rafael Beyar",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "215--224",
journal = "JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1936-8798",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient safety and outcomes from live case demonstrations of interventional cardiology procedures

AU - Eliyahu, Shiran

AU - Roguin, Ariel

AU - Kerner, Arthur

AU - Boulos, Monther

AU - Lorber, Avraham

AU - Halabi, Majdi

AU - Suleiman, Mahmoud

AU - Nikolsky, Eugenia

AU - Rispler, Shmuel

AU - Beyar, Rafael

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Objectives: The goal of this study was to examine the safety and results of interventional procedures performed during the broadcast of live case demonstrations. Background: Professional meetings using live case demonstrations to present cutting-edge technology are considered a valuable educational resource. There is an ongoing discussion on whether patients who are treated during live case demonstrations are exposed to a higher risk. Methods: Between 1998 and 2010, 101 patients were treated during live transmissions from a single center in 15 invasive-cardiology conferences. Technical success was defined as the ability to effectively perform the planned procedure without any major complication. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results: The interventional procedures included coronary (n = 66), carotid (n = 15), peripheral (n = 1), valvular (n = 2), congenital heart disease (n = 12), and complex electrophysiological mapping and ablation interventions (n = 7). In 4 cases, the intended procedure was not done. The procedure was technically successful in 95%. In 5 cases, the procedure was unsuccessful because of the inability to cross a chronic total occlusion. There were no deaths during the hospital stay, and the composite primary endpoint occurred in 2 patients: a minor stroke following an atrial fibrillation ablation and a rise in serum troponin levels after percutaneous coronary intervention. These results were no different from those of 66 matched controls who underwent procedures performed by the same operators but not as live case demonstrations (relative risk: 0.32; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 3.62, p = 0.62). Conclusions: In this consecutive series of interventional cardiology procedures that were performed by expert operators during live demonstration courses, the procedural and 30-day clinical outcomes were similar to those found in daily practice and to those that have been reported in the contemporary published data. These results suggest that broadcasting live case demonstrations in selected patients from selected centers may be safe.

AB - Objectives: The goal of this study was to examine the safety and results of interventional procedures performed during the broadcast of live case demonstrations. Background: Professional meetings using live case demonstrations to present cutting-edge technology are considered a valuable educational resource. There is an ongoing discussion on whether patients who are treated during live case demonstrations are exposed to a higher risk. Methods: Between 1998 and 2010, 101 patients were treated during live transmissions from a single center in 15 invasive-cardiology conferences. Technical success was defined as the ability to effectively perform the planned procedure without any major complication. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results: The interventional procedures included coronary (n = 66), carotid (n = 15), peripheral (n = 1), valvular (n = 2), congenital heart disease (n = 12), and complex electrophysiological mapping and ablation interventions (n = 7). In 4 cases, the intended procedure was not done. The procedure was technically successful in 95%. In 5 cases, the procedure was unsuccessful because of the inability to cross a chronic total occlusion. There were no deaths during the hospital stay, and the composite primary endpoint occurred in 2 patients: a minor stroke following an atrial fibrillation ablation and a rise in serum troponin levels after percutaneous coronary intervention. These results were no different from those of 66 matched controls who underwent procedures performed by the same operators but not as live case demonstrations (relative risk: 0.32; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 3.62, p = 0.62). Conclusions: In this consecutive series of interventional cardiology procedures that were performed by expert operators during live demonstration courses, the procedural and 30-day clinical outcomes were similar to those found in daily practice and to those that have been reported in the contemporary published data. These results suggest that broadcasting live case demonstrations in selected patients from selected centers may be safe.

KW - education

KW - interventional cardiology

KW - live case demonstration

KW - safety

KW - stenting

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857579409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857579409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.023

DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 22361607

AN - SCOPUS:84857579409

VL - 5

SP - 215

EP - 224

JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1936-8798

IS - 2

ER -