Patient Ratings of Dialysis Care with Peritoneal Dialysis vs Hemodialysis

Haya R. Rubin, Nancy E. Fink, Laura C. Plantinga, John H. Sadler, Alan S. Kliger, Neil R. Powe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: In light of conflicting evidence of differential effects of dialysis modality on survival, patient experience becomes a more important consideration in choosing between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Objective: To compare patient satisfaction with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in a cohort of patients who have recently begun dialysis. Design and Setting: Cross-sectional survey at enrollment in a prospective inception cohort study of patients who recently started dialysis at 37 dialysis centers participating in the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) study, a national multicenter study of dialysis outcomes, from October 1995 to June 1998. Patients: Of 736 enrolled incident dialysis patients, 656 (89%) returned a satisfaction questionnaire after an average of 7 weeks of dialysis. Main Outcome Measure: Data collected from a patient-administered questionnaire including 3 overall ratings and 20 items rating specific aspects of dialysis care. Results: Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis were much more likely than those receiving hemodialysis to give excellent ratings of dialysis care overall (85% vs 56%, respectively; relative probability, 1.46 [95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.57]) and significantly more likely to give excellent ratings for each specific aspect of care rated. The 3 items with the greatest differences were in the domain of information provided (average of information items: peritoneal dialysis [69% excellent] vs hemodialysis [30% excellent]). The smallest differences were in ratings of accuracy of information from the nephrologist, response to pain, amount of fluid removed, and staff availability in an emergency. Adjustment for patient age, race, education, health status, marital status, employment status, distance from the center, and time since starting dialysis did not reduce the differences between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients. Conclusions: After several weeks of initiating dialysis, patients receiving peritoneal dialysis rated their care higher than those receiving hemodialysis. These findings indicate that clinicians should give patients more information about the option of peritoneal dialysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)697-703
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume291
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 11 2004

Fingerprint

Peritoneal Dialysis
Renal Dialysis
Dialysis
Marital Status
Patient Satisfaction
Health Status
Multicenter Studies
Chronic Kidney Failure
Emergencies
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Confidence Intervals
Education
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Rubin, H. R., Fink, N. E., Plantinga, L. C., Sadler, J. H., Kliger, A. S., & Powe, N. R. (2004). Patient Ratings of Dialysis Care with Peritoneal Dialysis vs Hemodialysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291(6), 697-703. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.6.697

Patient Ratings of Dialysis Care with Peritoneal Dialysis vs Hemodialysis. / Rubin, Haya R.; Fink, Nancy E.; Plantinga, Laura C.; Sadler, John H.; Kliger, Alan S.; Powe, Neil R.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 291, No. 6, 11.02.2004, p. 697-703.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rubin, HR, Fink, NE, Plantinga, LC, Sadler, JH, Kliger, AS & Powe, NR 2004, 'Patient Ratings of Dialysis Care with Peritoneal Dialysis vs Hemodialysis', Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 291, no. 6, pp. 697-703. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.6.697
Rubin, Haya R. ; Fink, Nancy E. ; Plantinga, Laura C. ; Sadler, John H. ; Kliger, Alan S. ; Powe, Neil R. / Patient Ratings of Dialysis Care with Peritoneal Dialysis vs Hemodialysis. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004 ; Vol. 291, No. 6. pp. 697-703.
@article{fc91c3dbdb60472688f978dfea56c564,
title = "Patient Ratings of Dialysis Care with Peritoneal Dialysis vs Hemodialysis",
abstract = "Context: In light of conflicting evidence of differential effects of dialysis modality on survival, patient experience becomes a more important consideration in choosing between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Objective: To compare patient satisfaction with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in a cohort of patients who have recently begun dialysis. Design and Setting: Cross-sectional survey at enrollment in a prospective inception cohort study of patients who recently started dialysis at 37 dialysis centers participating in the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) study, a national multicenter study of dialysis outcomes, from October 1995 to June 1998. Patients: Of 736 enrolled incident dialysis patients, 656 (89{\%}) returned a satisfaction questionnaire after an average of 7 weeks of dialysis. Main Outcome Measure: Data collected from a patient-administered questionnaire including 3 overall ratings and 20 items rating specific aspects of dialysis care. Results: Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis were much more likely than those receiving hemodialysis to give excellent ratings of dialysis care overall (85{\%} vs 56{\%}, respectively; relative probability, 1.46 [95{\%} confidence interval, 1.31-1.57]) and significantly more likely to give excellent ratings for each specific aspect of care rated. The 3 items with the greatest differences were in the domain of information provided (average of information items: peritoneal dialysis [69{\%} excellent] vs hemodialysis [30{\%} excellent]). The smallest differences were in ratings of accuracy of information from the nephrologist, response to pain, amount of fluid removed, and staff availability in an emergency. Adjustment for patient age, race, education, health status, marital status, employment status, distance from the center, and time since starting dialysis did not reduce the differences between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients. Conclusions: After several weeks of initiating dialysis, patients receiving peritoneal dialysis rated their care higher than those receiving hemodialysis. These findings indicate that clinicians should give patients more information about the option of peritoneal dialysis.",
author = "Rubin, {Haya R.} and Fink, {Nancy E.} and Plantinga, {Laura C.} and Sadler, {John H.} and Kliger, {Alan S.} and Powe, {Neil R.}",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1001/jama.291.6.697",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "291",
pages = "697--703",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0098-7484",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient Ratings of Dialysis Care with Peritoneal Dialysis vs Hemodialysis

AU - Rubin, Haya R.

AU - Fink, Nancy E.

AU - Plantinga, Laura C.

AU - Sadler, John H.

AU - Kliger, Alan S.

AU - Powe, Neil R.

PY - 2004/2/11

Y1 - 2004/2/11

N2 - Context: In light of conflicting evidence of differential effects of dialysis modality on survival, patient experience becomes a more important consideration in choosing between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Objective: To compare patient satisfaction with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in a cohort of patients who have recently begun dialysis. Design and Setting: Cross-sectional survey at enrollment in a prospective inception cohort study of patients who recently started dialysis at 37 dialysis centers participating in the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) study, a national multicenter study of dialysis outcomes, from October 1995 to June 1998. Patients: Of 736 enrolled incident dialysis patients, 656 (89%) returned a satisfaction questionnaire after an average of 7 weeks of dialysis. Main Outcome Measure: Data collected from a patient-administered questionnaire including 3 overall ratings and 20 items rating specific aspects of dialysis care. Results: Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis were much more likely than those receiving hemodialysis to give excellent ratings of dialysis care overall (85% vs 56%, respectively; relative probability, 1.46 [95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.57]) and significantly more likely to give excellent ratings for each specific aspect of care rated. The 3 items with the greatest differences were in the domain of information provided (average of information items: peritoneal dialysis [69% excellent] vs hemodialysis [30% excellent]). The smallest differences were in ratings of accuracy of information from the nephrologist, response to pain, amount of fluid removed, and staff availability in an emergency. Adjustment for patient age, race, education, health status, marital status, employment status, distance from the center, and time since starting dialysis did not reduce the differences between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients. Conclusions: After several weeks of initiating dialysis, patients receiving peritoneal dialysis rated their care higher than those receiving hemodialysis. These findings indicate that clinicians should give patients more information about the option of peritoneal dialysis.

AB - Context: In light of conflicting evidence of differential effects of dialysis modality on survival, patient experience becomes a more important consideration in choosing between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Objective: To compare patient satisfaction with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in a cohort of patients who have recently begun dialysis. Design and Setting: Cross-sectional survey at enrollment in a prospective inception cohort study of patients who recently started dialysis at 37 dialysis centers participating in the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) study, a national multicenter study of dialysis outcomes, from October 1995 to June 1998. Patients: Of 736 enrolled incident dialysis patients, 656 (89%) returned a satisfaction questionnaire after an average of 7 weeks of dialysis. Main Outcome Measure: Data collected from a patient-administered questionnaire including 3 overall ratings and 20 items rating specific aspects of dialysis care. Results: Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis were much more likely than those receiving hemodialysis to give excellent ratings of dialysis care overall (85% vs 56%, respectively; relative probability, 1.46 [95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.57]) and significantly more likely to give excellent ratings for each specific aspect of care rated. The 3 items with the greatest differences were in the domain of information provided (average of information items: peritoneal dialysis [69% excellent] vs hemodialysis [30% excellent]). The smallest differences were in ratings of accuracy of information from the nephrologist, response to pain, amount of fluid removed, and staff availability in an emergency. Adjustment for patient age, race, education, health status, marital status, employment status, distance from the center, and time since starting dialysis did not reduce the differences between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients. Conclusions: After several weeks of initiating dialysis, patients receiving peritoneal dialysis rated their care higher than those receiving hemodialysis. These findings indicate that clinicians should give patients more information about the option of peritoneal dialysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1442339186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1442339186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.291.6.697

DO - 10.1001/jama.291.6.697

M3 - Article

VL - 291

SP - 697

EP - 703

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0098-7484

IS - 6

ER -