Pathways to Medical Home Recognition: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the PCMH Transformation Process

Peter Mendel, Emily K. Chen, Harold D. Green, Courtney Armstrong, Justin W. Timbie, Amii Kress, Mark W. Friedberg, Katherine L. Kahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To understand the process of practice transformation by identifying pathways for attaining patient-centered medical home (PCMH) recognition. Data Sources/Study Setting: The CMS Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration was designed to help FQHCs achieve NCQA Level 3 PCMH recognition and improve patient outcomes. We used a stratified random sample of 20 (out of 503) participating sites for this analysis. Study Design: We developed a conceptual model of structural, cultural, and implementation factors affecting PCMH transformation based on literature and initial qualitative interview themes. We then used conventional cross-case analysis, followed by qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), a cross-case method based on Boolean logic algorithms, to systematically identify pathways (i.e., combinations of factors) associated with attaining-or not attaining-Level 3 recognition. Data Collection Methods: Site-level indicators were derived from semistructured interviews with site leaders at two points in time (mid- and late-implementation) and administrative data collected prior to and during the demonstration period. Principal Findings: The QCA results identified five distinct pathways to attaining PCMH recognition and four distinct pathways to not attaining recognition by the end of the demonstration. Across these pathways, one condition (change leader capacity) was common to all pathways for attaining recognition, and another (previous improvement or recognition experience) was absent in all pathways for not attaining recognition. In general, sites could compensate for deficiencies in one factor with capacity in others, but they needed a threshold of strengths in cultural and implementation factors to attain PCMH recognition. Conclusions: Future efforts at primary care transformation should take into account multiple pathways sites may pursue. Sites should be assessed on key cultural and implementation factors, in addition to structural components, in order to differentiate interventions and technical assistance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHealth Services Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Patient-Centered Care
Primary Health Care
Interviews
Information Storage and Retrieval
Structural Models
Health

Keywords

  • Medical home
  • PCMH recognition
  • Practice transformation
  • QCA
  • Qualitative comparative analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Pathways to Medical Home Recognition : A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the PCMH Transformation Process. / Mendel, Peter; Chen, Emily K.; Green, Harold D.; Armstrong, Courtney; Timbie, Justin W.; Kress, Amii; Friedberg, Mark W.; Kahn, Katherine L.

In: Health Services Research, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mendel, Peter ; Chen, Emily K. ; Green, Harold D. ; Armstrong, Courtney ; Timbie, Justin W. ; Kress, Amii ; Friedberg, Mark W. ; Kahn, Katherine L. / Pathways to Medical Home Recognition : A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the PCMH Transformation Process. In: Health Services Research. 2017.
@article{12a3fa556f42401ca6d4ab8de15110ff,
title = "Pathways to Medical Home Recognition: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the PCMH Transformation Process",
abstract = "Objective: To understand the process of practice transformation by identifying pathways for attaining patient-centered medical home (PCMH) recognition. Data Sources/Study Setting: The CMS Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration was designed to help FQHCs achieve NCQA Level 3 PCMH recognition and improve patient outcomes. We used a stratified random sample of 20 (out of 503) participating sites for this analysis. Study Design: We developed a conceptual model of structural, cultural, and implementation factors affecting PCMH transformation based on literature and initial qualitative interview themes. We then used conventional cross-case analysis, followed by qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), a cross-case method based on Boolean logic algorithms, to systematically identify pathways (i.e., combinations of factors) associated with attaining-or not attaining-Level 3 recognition. Data Collection Methods: Site-level indicators were derived from semistructured interviews with site leaders at two points in time (mid- and late-implementation) and administrative data collected prior to and during the demonstration period. Principal Findings: The QCA results identified five distinct pathways to attaining PCMH recognition and four distinct pathways to not attaining recognition by the end of the demonstration. Across these pathways, one condition (change leader capacity) was common to all pathways for attaining recognition, and another (previous improvement or recognition experience) was absent in all pathways for not attaining recognition. In general, sites could compensate for deficiencies in one factor with capacity in others, but they needed a threshold of strengths in cultural and implementation factors to attain PCMH recognition. Conclusions: Future efforts at primary care transformation should take into account multiple pathways sites may pursue. Sites should be assessed on key cultural and implementation factors, in addition to structural components, in order to differentiate interventions and technical assistance.",
keywords = "Medical home, PCMH recognition, Practice transformation, QCA, Qualitative comparative analysis",
author = "Peter Mendel and Chen, {Emily K.} and Green, {Harold D.} and Courtney Armstrong and Timbie, {Justin W.} and Amii Kress and Friedberg, {Mark W.} and Kahn, {Katherine L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.12803",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathways to Medical Home Recognition

T2 - A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the PCMH Transformation Process

AU - Mendel, Peter

AU - Chen, Emily K.

AU - Green, Harold D.

AU - Armstrong, Courtney

AU - Timbie, Justin W.

AU - Kress, Amii

AU - Friedberg, Mark W.

AU - Kahn, Katherine L.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objective: To understand the process of practice transformation by identifying pathways for attaining patient-centered medical home (PCMH) recognition. Data Sources/Study Setting: The CMS Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration was designed to help FQHCs achieve NCQA Level 3 PCMH recognition and improve patient outcomes. We used a stratified random sample of 20 (out of 503) participating sites for this analysis. Study Design: We developed a conceptual model of structural, cultural, and implementation factors affecting PCMH transformation based on literature and initial qualitative interview themes. We then used conventional cross-case analysis, followed by qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), a cross-case method based on Boolean logic algorithms, to systematically identify pathways (i.e., combinations of factors) associated with attaining-or not attaining-Level 3 recognition. Data Collection Methods: Site-level indicators were derived from semistructured interviews with site leaders at two points in time (mid- and late-implementation) and administrative data collected prior to and during the demonstration period. Principal Findings: The QCA results identified five distinct pathways to attaining PCMH recognition and four distinct pathways to not attaining recognition by the end of the demonstration. Across these pathways, one condition (change leader capacity) was common to all pathways for attaining recognition, and another (previous improvement or recognition experience) was absent in all pathways for not attaining recognition. In general, sites could compensate for deficiencies in one factor with capacity in others, but they needed a threshold of strengths in cultural and implementation factors to attain PCMH recognition. Conclusions: Future efforts at primary care transformation should take into account multiple pathways sites may pursue. Sites should be assessed on key cultural and implementation factors, in addition to structural components, in order to differentiate interventions and technical assistance.

AB - Objective: To understand the process of practice transformation by identifying pathways for attaining patient-centered medical home (PCMH) recognition. Data Sources/Study Setting: The CMS Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration was designed to help FQHCs achieve NCQA Level 3 PCMH recognition and improve patient outcomes. We used a stratified random sample of 20 (out of 503) participating sites for this analysis. Study Design: We developed a conceptual model of structural, cultural, and implementation factors affecting PCMH transformation based on literature and initial qualitative interview themes. We then used conventional cross-case analysis, followed by qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), a cross-case method based on Boolean logic algorithms, to systematically identify pathways (i.e., combinations of factors) associated with attaining-or not attaining-Level 3 recognition. Data Collection Methods: Site-level indicators were derived from semistructured interviews with site leaders at two points in time (mid- and late-implementation) and administrative data collected prior to and during the demonstration period. Principal Findings: The QCA results identified five distinct pathways to attaining PCMH recognition and four distinct pathways to not attaining recognition by the end of the demonstration. Across these pathways, one condition (change leader capacity) was common to all pathways for attaining recognition, and another (previous improvement or recognition experience) was absent in all pathways for not attaining recognition. In general, sites could compensate for deficiencies in one factor with capacity in others, but they needed a threshold of strengths in cultural and implementation factors to attain PCMH recognition. Conclusions: Future efforts at primary care transformation should take into account multiple pathways sites may pursue. Sites should be assessed on key cultural and implementation factors, in addition to structural components, in order to differentiate interventions and technical assistance.

KW - Medical home

KW - PCMH recognition

KW - Practice transformation

KW - QCA

KW - Qualitative comparative analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037985269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037985269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.12803

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.12803

M3 - Article

C2 - 29243823

AN - SCOPUS:85037985269

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

ER -