Pathways to high and low performance: Factors differentiating primary care facilities under performance-based financing in Nigeria

Shunsuke Mabuchi, Temilade Sesan, Sara C Bennett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The determinants of primary health facility performance in developing countries have not been well studied. One of the most under-researched areas is health facility management. This study investigated health facilities under the pilot performance-based financing (PBF) scheme in Nigeria, and aimed to understand which factors differentiated primary health care centres (PHCCs) which had performed well, vs those which had not, with a focus on health facility management practices. We used a multiple case study where we compared two high-performing PHCCs and two low-performing PHCCs for each of the two PBF target states. Two teams of two trained local researchers spent 1 week at each PHCC and collected semi-structured interview, observation and documentary data. Data from interviews were transcribed, translated and coded using a framework approach. The data for each PHCC were synthesized to understand dynamic interactions of different elements in each case. We then compared the characteristics of high and low performers. The areas in which critical differences between high and low-performers emerged were: community engagement and support; and performance and staff management. We also found that (i) contextual and health system factors particularly staffing, access and competition with other providers; (ii) health centre management including community engagement, performance management and staff management; and (iii) community leader support interacted and drove performance improvement among the PHCCs. Among them, we found that good health centre management can overcome some contextual and health system barriers and enhance community leader support. This study findings suggest a strong need to select capable and motivated health centre managers, provide long-term coaching in managerial skills, and motivate them to improve their practices. The study also highlights the need to position engagement with community leaders as a key management practice and a central element of interventions to improve PHCC performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-58
Number of pages18
JournalHealth Policy and Planning
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Nigeria
Primary Health Care
Health Facilities
Health
Practice Management
Interviews
Developing Countries
Research Personnel
Observation

Keywords

  • community
  • Health facilities
  • health sector reform
  • health services
  • health systems
  • health workers
  • international health
  • management
  • maternal and child health
  • primary health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Pathways to high and low performance : Factors differentiating primary care facilities under performance-based financing in Nigeria. / Mabuchi, Shunsuke; Sesan, Temilade; Bennett, Sara C.

In: Health Policy and Planning, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 41-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bbda9d3ea95c4a83adc11aab5532c1f5,
title = "Pathways to high and low performance: Factors differentiating primary care facilities under performance-based financing in Nigeria",
abstract = "The determinants of primary health facility performance in developing countries have not been well studied. One of the most under-researched areas is health facility management. This study investigated health facilities under the pilot performance-based financing (PBF) scheme in Nigeria, and aimed to understand which factors differentiated primary health care centres (PHCCs) which had performed well, vs those which had not, with a focus on health facility management practices. We used a multiple case study where we compared two high-performing PHCCs and two low-performing PHCCs for each of the two PBF target states. Two teams of two trained local researchers spent 1 week at each PHCC and collected semi-structured interview, observation and documentary data. Data from interviews were transcribed, translated and coded using a framework approach. The data for each PHCC were synthesized to understand dynamic interactions of different elements in each case. We then compared the characteristics of high and low performers. The areas in which critical differences between high and low-performers emerged were: community engagement and support; and performance and staff management. We also found that (i) contextual and health system factors particularly staffing, access and competition with other providers; (ii) health centre management including community engagement, performance management and staff management; and (iii) community leader support interacted and drove performance improvement among the PHCCs. Among them, we found that good health centre management can overcome some contextual and health system barriers and enhance community leader support. This study findings suggest a strong need to select capable and motivated health centre managers, provide long-term coaching in managerial skills, and motivate them to improve their practices. The study also highlights the need to position engagement with community leaders as a key management practice and a central element of interventions to improve PHCC performance.",
keywords = "community, Health facilities, health sector reform, health services, health systems, health workers, international health, management, maternal and child health, primary health care",
author = "Shunsuke Mabuchi and Temilade Sesan and Bennett, {Sara C}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/heapol/czx146",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "41--58",
journal = "Health Policy and Planning",
issn = "0268-1080",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathways to high and low performance

T2 - Factors differentiating primary care facilities under performance-based financing in Nigeria

AU - Mabuchi, Shunsuke

AU - Sesan, Temilade

AU - Bennett, Sara C

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The determinants of primary health facility performance in developing countries have not been well studied. One of the most under-researched areas is health facility management. This study investigated health facilities under the pilot performance-based financing (PBF) scheme in Nigeria, and aimed to understand which factors differentiated primary health care centres (PHCCs) which had performed well, vs those which had not, with a focus on health facility management practices. We used a multiple case study where we compared two high-performing PHCCs and two low-performing PHCCs for each of the two PBF target states. Two teams of two trained local researchers spent 1 week at each PHCC and collected semi-structured interview, observation and documentary data. Data from interviews were transcribed, translated and coded using a framework approach. The data for each PHCC were synthesized to understand dynamic interactions of different elements in each case. We then compared the characteristics of high and low performers. The areas in which critical differences between high and low-performers emerged were: community engagement and support; and performance and staff management. We also found that (i) contextual and health system factors particularly staffing, access and competition with other providers; (ii) health centre management including community engagement, performance management and staff management; and (iii) community leader support interacted and drove performance improvement among the PHCCs. Among them, we found that good health centre management can overcome some contextual and health system barriers and enhance community leader support. This study findings suggest a strong need to select capable and motivated health centre managers, provide long-term coaching in managerial skills, and motivate them to improve their practices. The study also highlights the need to position engagement with community leaders as a key management practice and a central element of interventions to improve PHCC performance.

AB - The determinants of primary health facility performance in developing countries have not been well studied. One of the most under-researched areas is health facility management. This study investigated health facilities under the pilot performance-based financing (PBF) scheme in Nigeria, and aimed to understand which factors differentiated primary health care centres (PHCCs) which had performed well, vs those which had not, with a focus on health facility management practices. We used a multiple case study where we compared two high-performing PHCCs and two low-performing PHCCs for each of the two PBF target states. Two teams of two trained local researchers spent 1 week at each PHCC and collected semi-structured interview, observation and documentary data. Data from interviews were transcribed, translated and coded using a framework approach. The data for each PHCC were synthesized to understand dynamic interactions of different elements in each case. We then compared the characteristics of high and low performers. The areas in which critical differences between high and low-performers emerged were: community engagement and support; and performance and staff management. We also found that (i) contextual and health system factors particularly staffing, access and competition with other providers; (ii) health centre management including community engagement, performance management and staff management; and (iii) community leader support interacted and drove performance improvement among the PHCCs. Among them, we found that good health centre management can overcome some contextual and health system barriers and enhance community leader support. This study findings suggest a strong need to select capable and motivated health centre managers, provide long-term coaching in managerial skills, and motivate them to improve their practices. The study also highlights the need to position engagement with community leaders as a key management practice and a central element of interventions to improve PHCC performance.

KW - community

KW - Health facilities

KW - health sector reform

KW - health services

KW - health systems

KW - health workers

KW - international health

KW - management

KW - maternal and child health

KW - primary health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040699176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040699176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/heapol/czx146

DO - 10.1093/heapol/czx146

M3 - Article

C2 - 29077844

AN - SCOPUS:85040699176

VL - 33

SP - 41

EP - 58

JO - Health Policy and Planning

JF - Health Policy and Planning

SN - 0268-1080

IS - 1

ER -