Pathologists and the judicial process: How to avoid it

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This review article covers the full range of issues concerning malpractice as it relates to pathologists. Following a brief summary as to the incidence and general statistics on the outcome of lawsuits as well as common pathology misdiagnoses resulting in lawsuits, the definition of malpractice is discussed. These include duty, breech of standard of care, proximal cause, and damage. Details are provided as to what a pathologist should do from the initial threat of a lawsuit, to the initial lawsuit, and through the initial physician/lawyer meeting. An in-depth analysis as to how pathologists should handle themselves through the discovery process and, in particular, deposition is provided. Plaintiff attorneys' goals at deposition are covered in depth. These goals include: 1) education about the pathologist's case and strategies; 2) impeachment of the pathologist's credibility; and 3) judgment as to how effective a witness the pathologist will be at trial. Various types of plaintiff's attorney at deposition are summarized. Also discussed is the postdeposition meeting with the legal representative, whether to settle, and specific issues relating to trial. Finally, general tips on how to avoid a lawsuit in pathology are reviewed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)527-537
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Lawyers
Malpractice
Pathology
Standard of Care
Diagnostic Errors
Pathologists
Physicians
Education
Incidence

Keywords

  • Lawsuits
  • Malpractice
  • Pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Pathologists and the judicial process : How to avoid it. / Epstein, Jonathan Ira.

In: American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2001, p. 527-537.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d7052c5a696b4b3ebfc52b313a31e245,
title = "Pathologists and the judicial process: How to avoid it",
abstract = "This review article covers the full range of issues concerning malpractice as it relates to pathologists. Following a brief summary as to the incidence and general statistics on the outcome of lawsuits as well as common pathology misdiagnoses resulting in lawsuits, the definition of malpractice is discussed. These include duty, breech of standard of care, proximal cause, and damage. Details are provided as to what a pathologist should do from the initial threat of a lawsuit, to the initial lawsuit, and through the initial physician/lawyer meeting. An in-depth analysis as to how pathologists should handle themselves through the discovery process and, in particular, deposition is provided. Plaintiff attorneys' goals at deposition are covered in depth. These goals include: 1) education about the pathologist's case and strategies; 2) impeachment of the pathologist's credibility; and 3) judgment as to how effective a witness the pathologist will be at trial. Various types of plaintiff's attorney at deposition are summarized. Also discussed is the postdeposition meeting with the legal representative, whether to settle, and specific issues relating to trial. Finally, general tips on how to avoid a lawsuit in pathology are reviewed.",
keywords = "Lawsuits, Malpractice, Pathology",
author = "Epstein, {Jonathan Ira}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1097/00000478-200104000-00014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "527--537",
journal = "American Journal of Surgical Pathology",
issn = "0147-5185",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathologists and the judicial process

T2 - How to avoid it

AU - Epstein, Jonathan Ira

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - This review article covers the full range of issues concerning malpractice as it relates to pathologists. Following a brief summary as to the incidence and general statistics on the outcome of lawsuits as well as common pathology misdiagnoses resulting in lawsuits, the definition of malpractice is discussed. These include duty, breech of standard of care, proximal cause, and damage. Details are provided as to what a pathologist should do from the initial threat of a lawsuit, to the initial lawsuit, and through the initial physician/lawyer meeting. An in-depth analysis as to how pathologists should handle themselves through the discovery process and, in particular, deposition is provided. Plaintiff attorneys' goals at deposition are covered in depth. These goals include: 1) education about the pathologist's case and strategies; 2) impeachment of the pathologist's credibility; and 3) judgment as to how effective a witness the pathologist will be at trial. Various types of plaintiff's attorney at deposition are summarized. Also discussed is the postdeposition meeting with the legal representative, whether to settle, and specific issues relating to trial. Finally, general tips on how to avoid a lawsuit in pathology are reviewed.

AB - This review article covers the full range of issues concerning malpractice as it relates to pathologists. Following a brief summary as to the incidence and general statistics on the outcome of lawsuits as well as common pathology misdiagnoses resulting in lawsuits, the definition of malpractice is discussed. These include duty, breech of standard of care, proximal cause, and damage. Details are provided as to what a pathologist should do from the initial threat of a lawsuit, to the initial lawsuit, and through the initial physician/lawyer meeting. An in-depth analysis as to how pathologists should handle themselves through the discovery process and, in particular, deposition is provided. Plaintiff attorneys' goals at deposition are covered in depth. These goals include: 1) education about the pathologist's case and strategies; 2) impeachment of the pathologist's credibility; and 3) judgment as to how effective a witness the pathologist will be at trial. Various types of plaintiff's attorney at deposition are summarized. Also discussed is the postdeposition meeting with the legal representative, whether to settle, and specific issues relating to trial. Finally, general tips on how to avoid a lawsuit in pathology are reviewed.

KW - Lawsuits

KW - Malpractice

KW - Pathology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035074451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035074451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000478-200104000-00014

DO - 10.1097/00000478-200104000-00014

M3 - Article

C2 - 11257629

AN - SCOPUS:0035074451

VL - 25

SP - 527

EP - 537

JO - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

SN - 0147-5185

IS - 4

ER -