Partnering for quality

Peter J. Pronovost, Christine G. Holzmueller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article discusses efforts being made by multiple stakeholders to improve quality and safety in intensive care units (ICUs). The Leapfrog Group (Washington, DC), a consortium of purchasers, is reaching for quality by implementing safety standards. One standard, staffing ICUs with intensivists, is associated with a 30% reduction in hospital mortality and a 40% reduction in ICU mortality. While Leapfrog is addressing quality improvements on a structural level, JCAHO is developing empiric measures for ICU quality, which are being beta tested, to complement Leapfrogs' efforts. JCAHO used rigorously defined processes to develop and refine these measures. These measures include deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis, catheter-related blood stream infections, mortality and length of stay - APACHE III risk adjustment. Finally, ICU providers at Hopkins implemented an 8-step unit-based safety program. This comprehensive program is run at the unit level, works to improve safety culture, addresses staff safety concerns, partners hospital leaders with unit workers, helps staff implement improvement initiatives, uses rigorous data collection methods, and easily disseminated in other clinical areas. Providers can frame their efforts after 3 fundamental concepts from these initiatives: create a culture that supports quality and safety, standardize work processes by reducing complexity and using independent redundancy, and automate. The take home message is, when we come to work every day, we must be committed to quality and safety, and lead our teams to do the same.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-129
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004

Fingerprint

Intensive Care Units
Safety
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Risk Adjustment
Safety Management
APACHE
Mortality
Quality Improvement
Hospital Mortality
Peptic Ulcer
Venous Thrombosis
Length of Stay
Catheters
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Pronovost, P. J., & Holzmueller, C. G. (2004). Partnering for quality. Journal of Critical Care, 19(3), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.07.004

Partnering for quality. / Pronovost, Peter J.; Holzmueller, Christine G.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 19, No. 3, 09.2004, p. 121-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pronovost, PJ & Holzmueller, CG 2004, 'Partnering for quality', Journal of Critical Care, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.07.004
Pronovost, Peter J. ; Holzmueller, Christine G. / Partnering for quality. In: Journal of Critical Care. 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 121-129.
@article{d1c0d7089304466eae3565447a38d83e,
title = "Partnering for quality",
abstract = "This article discusses efforts being made by multiple stakeholders to improve quality and safety in intensive care units (ICUs). The Leapfrog Group (Washington, DC), a consortium of purchasers, is reaching for quality by implementing safety standards. One standard, staffing ICUs with intensivists, is associated with a 30{\%} reduction in hospital mortality and a 40{\%} reduction in ICU mortality. While Leapfrog is addressing quality improvements on a structural level, JCAHO is developing empiric measures for ICU quality, which are being beta tested, to complement Leapfrogs' efforts. JCAHO used rigorously defined processes to develop and refine these measures. These measures include deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis, catheter-related blood stream infections, mortality and length of stay - APACHE III risk adjustment. Finally, ICU providers at Hopkins implemented an 8-step unit-based safety program. This comprehensive program is run at the unit level, works to improve safety culture, addresses staff safety concerns, partners hospital leaders with unit workers, helps staff implement improvement initiatives, uses rigorous data collection methods, and easily disseminated in other clinical areas. Providers can frame their efforts after 3 fundamental concepts from these initiatives: create a culture that supports quality and safety, standardize work processes by reducing complexity and using independent redundancy, and automate. The take home message is, when we come to work every day, we must be committed to quality and safety, and lead our teams to do the same.",
author = "Pronovost, {Peter J.} and Holzmueller, {Christine G.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.07.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "121--129",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partnering for quality

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

AU - Holzmueller, Christine G.

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - This article discusses efforts being made by multiple stakeholders to improve quality and safety in intensive care units (ICUs). The Leapfrog Group (Washington, DC), a consortium of purchasers, is reaching for quality by implementing safety standards. One standard, staffing ICUs with intensivists, is associated with a 30% reduction in hospital mortality and a 40% reduction in ICU mortality. While Leapfrog is addressing quality improvements on a structural level, JCAHO is developing empiric measures for ICU quality, which are being beta tested, to complement Leapfrogs' efforts. JCAHO used rigorously defined processes to develop and refine these measures. These measures include deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis, catheter-related blood stream infections, mortality and length of stay - APACHE III risk adjustment. Finally, ICU providers at Hopkins implemented an 8-step unit-based safety program. This comprehensive program is run at the unit level, works to improve safety culture, addresses staff safety concerns, partners hospital leaders with unit workers, helps staff implement improvement initiatives, uses rigorous data collection methods, and easily disseminated in other clinical areas. Providers can frame their efforts after 3 fundamental concepts from these initiatives: create a culture that supports quality and safety, standardize work processes by reducing complexity and using independent redundancy, and automate. The take home message is, when we come to work every day, we must be committed to quality and safety, and lead our teams to do the same.

AB - This article discusses efforts being made by multiple stakeholders to improve quality and safety in intensive care units (ICUs). The Leapfrog Group (Washington, DC), a consortium of purchasers, is reaching for quality by implementing safety standards. One standard, staffing ICUs with intensivists, is associated with a 30% reduction in hospital mortality and a 40% reduction in ICU mortality. While Leapfrog is addressing quality improvements on a structural level, JCAHO is developing empiric measures for ICU quality, which are being beta tested, to complement Leapfrogs' efforts. JCAHO used rigorously defined processes to develop and refine these measures. These measures include deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis, catheter-related blood stream infections, mortality and length of stay - APACHE III risk adjustment. Finally, ICU providers at Hopkins implemented an 8-step unit-based safety program. This comprehensive program is run at the unit level, works to improve safety culture, addresses staff safety concerns, partners hospital leaders with unit workers, helps staff implement improvement initiatives, uses rigorous data collection methods, and easily disseminated in other clinical areas. Providers can frame their efforts after 3 fundamental concepts from these initiatives: create a culture that supports quality and safety, standardize work processes by reducing complexity and using independent redundancy, and automate. The take home message is, when we come to work every day, we must be committed to quality and safety, and lead our teams to do the same.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4644306656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4644306656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.07.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 15484171

AN - SCOPUS:4644306656

VL - 19

SP - 121

EP - 129

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

IS - 3

ER -