Parental knowledge and choice regarding live and inactivated poliovirus vaccines

Mary Lou Thoms, Paul Z. Bodnar, J. Crossan O'Donovan, Elias G. Gouel, J. Ronald Walcher, Neal A Halsey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Concern about the 8 to 10 cases per year of vaccine- associated paralytic poliomyelitis caused by the live oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) has led to revised guidelines for immunization of children in the United States. The use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) at 2 and 4 months of age could require administration of 3 injections per visit until combination products are available. Objective: To determine parents' knowledge of poliovirus vaccines and the choices they would make between IPV and OPV. Methods: Parents of 240 children aged 2 weeks to 18 months under the care of 10 private pediatricians in the Baltimore, Md, metropolitan area were interviewed prior to the announcement of revised advisory committee guidelines. Results: The majority (62.5%) of respondents were not aware that 2 poliovirus vaccines are available. After reviewing standardized information about the vaccines and 2 alternate schedules, most (75%) parents would consult someone (primarily their physician) before making a final choice of a vaccine schedule. If parents made the choice without consulting anyone else, 61.3% would choose to have their child receive IPV and 3 injections per visit as compared with an all-OPV schedule and 2 injections per visit. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine was preferred by most parents because it would reduce the risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis. Oral poliovirus vaccine was preferred by 37.9% of parents primarily because it was given orally. If the number of injections at each visit was the same for both vaccines, 76.3% of parents would choose the IPV schedule, and if the number of injections was reduced to 2 by combining IPV with another vaccine, 87.9% of parents would choose IPV. Conclusion: The number of injections per visit is an important issue, but a majority of parents would choose to have their children receive extra injections to prevent the low risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)809-812
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Volume151
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 1997

Fingerprint

Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine
Parents
Oral Poliovirus Vaccine
Vaccines
Injections
Appointments and Schedules
Poliomyelitis
Poliovirus Vaccines
Guidelines
Baltimore
Advisory Committees
Immunization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Thoms, M. L., Bodnar, P. Z., O'Donovan, J. C., Gouel, E. G., Walcher, J. R., & Halsey, N. A. (1997). Parental knowledge and choice regarding live and inactivated poliovirus vaccines. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 151(8), 809-812.

Parental knowledge and choice regarding live and inactivated poliovirus vaccines. / Thoms, Mary Lou; Bodnar, Paul Z.; O'Donovan, J. Crossan; Gouel, Elias G.; Walcher, J. Ronald; Halsey, Neal A.

In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Vol. 151, No. 8, 08.1997, p. 809-812.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thoms, ML, Bodnar, PZ, O'Donovan, JC, Gouel, EG, Walcher, JR & Halsey, NA 1997, 'Parental knowledge and choice regarding live and inactivated poliovirus vaccines', Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, vol. 151, no. 8, pp. 809-812.
Thoms, Mary Lou ; Bodnar, Paul Z. ; O'Donovan, J. Crossan ; Gouel, Elias G. ; Walcher, J. Ronald ; Halsey, Neal A. / Parental knowledge and choice regarding live and inactivated poliovirus vaccines. In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 1997 ; Vol. 151, No. 8. pp. 809-812.
@article{475c3404112342599ce49a450b378f66,
title = "Parental knowledge and choice regarding live and inactivated poliovirus vaccines",
abstract = "Background: Concern about the 8 to 10 cases per year of vaccine- associated paralytic poliomyelitis caused by the live oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) has led to revised guidelines for immunization of children in the United States. The use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) at 2 and 4 months of age could require administration of 3 injections per visit until combination products are available. Objective: To determine parents' knowledge of poliovirus vaccines and the choices they would make between IPV and OPV. Methods: Parents of 240 children aged 2 weeks to 18 months under the care of 10 private pediatricians in the Baltimore, Md, metropolitan area were interviewed prior to the announcement of revised advisory committee guidelines. Results: The majority (62.5{\%}) of respondents were not aware that 2 poliovirus vaccines are available. After reviewing standardized information about the vaccines and 2 alternate schedules, most (75{\%}) parents would consult someone (primarily their physician) before making a final choice of a vaccine schedule. If parents made the choice without consulting anyone else, 61.3{\%} would choose to have their child receive IPV and 3 injections per visit as compared with an all-OPV schedule and 2 injections per visit. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine was preferred by most parents because it would reduce the risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis. Oral poliovirus vaccine was preferred by 37.9{\%} of parents primarily because it was given orally. If the number of injections at each visit was the same for both vaccines, 76.3{\%} of parents would choose the IPV schedule, and if the number of injections was reduced to 2 by combining IPV with another vaccine, 87.9{\%} of parents would choose IPV. Conclusion: The number of injections per visit is an important issue, but a majority of parents would choose to have their children receive extra injections to prevent the low risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis.",
author = "Thoms, {Mary Lou} and Bodnar, {Paul Z.} and O'Donovan, {J. Crossan} and Gouel, {Elias G.} and Walcher, {J. Ronald} and Halsey, {Neal A}",
year = "1997",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "151",
pages = "809--812",
journal = "JAMA Pediatrics",
issn = "2168-6203",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parental knowledge and choice regarding live and inactivated poliovirus vaccines

AU - Thoms, Mary Lou

AU - Bodnar, Paul Z.

AU - O'Donovan, J. Crossan

AU - Gouel, Elias G.

AU - Walcher, J. Ronald

AU - Halsey, Neal A

PY - 1997/8

Y1 - 1997/8

N2 - Background: Concern about the 8 to 10 cases per year of vaccine- associated paralytic poliomyelitis caused by the live oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) has led to revised guidelines for immunization of children in the United States. The use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) at 2 and 4 months of age could require administration of 3 injections per visit until combination products are available. Objective: To determine parents' knowledge of poliovirus vaccines and the choices they would make between IPV and OPV. Methods: Parents of 240 children aged 2 weeks to 18 months under the care of 10 private pediatricians in the Baltimore, Md, metropolitan area were interviewed prior to the announcement of revised advisory committee guidelines. Results: The majority (62.5%) of respondents were not aware that 2 poliovirus vaccines are available. After reviewing standardized information about the vaccines and 2 alternate schedules, most (75%) parents would consult someone (primarily their physician) before making a final choice of a vaccine schedule. If parents made the choice without consulting anyone else, 61.3% would choose to have their child receive IPV and 3 injections per visit as compared with an all-OPV schedule and 2 injections per visit. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine was preferred by most parents because it would reduce the risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis. Oral poliovirus vaccine was preferred by 37.9% of parents primarily because it was given orally. If the number of injections at each visit was the same for both vaccines, 76.3% of parents would choose the IPV schedule, and if the number of injections was reduced to 2 by combining IPV with another vaccine, 87.9% of parents would choose IPV. Conclusion: The number of injections per visit is an important issue, but a majority of parents would choose to have their children receive extra injections to prevent the low risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis.

AB - Background: Concern about the 8 to 10 cases per year of vaccine- associated paralytic poliomyelitis caused by the live oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) has led to revised guidelines for immunization of children in the United States. The use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) at 2 and 4 months of age could require administration of 3 injections per visit until combination products are available. Objective: To determine parents' knowledge of poliovirus vaccines and the choices they would make between IPV and OPV. Methods: Parents of 240 children aged 2 weeks to 18 months under the care of 10 private pediatricians in the Baltimore, Md, metropolitan area were interviewed prior to the announcement of revised advisory committee guidelines. Results: The majority (62.5%) of respondents were not aware that 2 poliovirus vaccines are available. After reviewing standardized information about the vaccines and 2 alternate schedules, most (75%) parents would consult someone (primarily their physician) before making a final choice of a vaccine schedule. If parents made the choice without consulting anyone else, 61.3% would choose to have their child receive IPV and 3 injections per visit as compared with an all-OPV schedule and 2 injections per visit. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine was preferred by most parents because it would reduce the risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis. Oral poliovirus vaccine was preferred by 37.9% of parents primarily because it was given orally. If the number of injections at each visit was the same for both vaccines, 76.3% of parents would choose the IPV schedule, and if the number of injections was reduced to 2 by combining IPV with another vaccine, 87.9% of parents would choose IPV. Conclusion: The number of injections per visit is an important issue, but a majority of parents would choose to have their children receive extra injections to prevent the low risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030854513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030854513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9265883

AN - SCOPUS:0030854513

VL - 151

SP - 809

EP - 812

JO - JAMA Pediatrics

JF - JAMA Pediatrics

SN - 2168-6203

IS - 8

ER -