Parent feeding behavior and child appetite

Associations depend on feeding style

Susan Carnell, Leora Benson, Elissa Driggin, Laura Kolbe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective Eating behavior traits measured in early life predict eating behavior and weight trajectories later in development, and may be associated with certain parental feeding behaviors. Our goal was to investigate the relationship between a range of feeding behaviors, and preschoolers' appetitive traits.

Method Four hundred thirty-nine parents of UK 3-5 year olds completed scales measuring authoritarian vs. authoritative forms of limiting (Restriction vs. Monitoring) and promoting (Pressuring vs. Prompting) intake, as well as Emotional and Instrumental Feeding. Parents also completed scales measuring child Food responsiveness and Satiety responsiveness. Child BMI z-scores were calculated based on measured heights and weights.

Results Parental Restriction was significantly associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p <.001), but parental Monitoring was not. Parental Pressuring was significantly associated with greater child Satiety responsiveness (p <.001), while parental Prompting was not. Parental Instrumental and Emotional feeding were both associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p <.001). All relationships were independent of child BMI z-score.

Discussion Prospective data are needed to determine whether the parent-child feeding relationships identified here promote, or protect against, the development of eating pathology in children. However, our results suggest that cross-sectional associations depend on the style (e.g., authoritarian vs. authoritative), as well as the type of feeding behavior measured.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)705-709
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Eating Disorders
Volume47
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014

Fingerprint

Feeding Behavior
Appetite
Food
Parents
Parent-Child Relations
Weights and Measures
Eating
Pathology

Keywords

  • intake regulation
  • maternal feeding
  • nonnutritive feeding
  • overfeeding
  • parental control over feeding
  • pressure to eat
  • restrictive feeding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Parent feeding behavior and child appetite : Associations depend on feeding style. / Carnell, Susan; Benson, Leora; Driggin, Elissa; Kolbe, Laura.

In: International Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol. 47, No. 7, 01.11.2014, p. 705-709.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carnell, Susan ; Benson, Leora ; Driggin, Elissa ; Kolbe, Laura. / Parent feeding behavior and child appetite : Associations depend on feeding style. In: International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2014 ; Vol. 47, No. 7. pp. 705-709.
@article{f53d35681ccf4476a68c980319ce50cd,
title = "Parent feeding behavior and child appetite: Associations depend on feeding style",
abstract = "Objective Eating behavior traits measured in early life predict eating behavior and weight trajectories later in development, and may be associated with certain parental feeding behaviors. Our goal was to investigate the relationship between a range of feeding behaviors, and preschoolers' appetitive traits.Method Four hundred thirty-nine parents of UK 3-5 year olds completed scales measuring authoritarian vs. authoritative forms of limiting (Restriction vs. Monitoring) and promoting (Pressuring vs. Prompting) intake, as well as Emotional and Instrumental Feeding. Parents also completed scales measuring child Food responsiveness and Satiety responsiveness. Child BMI z-scores were calculated based on measured heights and weights.Results Parental Restriction was significantly associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p <.001), but parental Monitoring was not. Parental Pressuring was significantly associated with greater child Satiety responsiveness (p <.001), while parental Prompting was not. Parental Instrumental and Emotional feeding were both associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p <.001). All relationships were independent of child BMI z-score.Discussion Prospective data are needed to determine whether the parent-child feeding relationships identified here promote, or protect against, the development of eating pathology in children. However, our results suggest that cross-sectional associations depend on the style (e.g., authoritarian vs. authoritative), as well as the type of feeding behavior measured.",
keywords = "intake regulation, maternal feeding, nonnutritive feeding, overfeeding, parental control over feeding, pressure to eat, restrictive feeding",
author = "Susan Carnell and Leora Benson and Elissa Driggin and Laura Kolbe",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/eat.22324",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "705--709",
journal = "International Journal of Eating Disorders",
issn = "0276-3478",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parent feeding behavior and child appetite

T2 - Associations depend on feeding style

AU - Carnell, Susan

AU - Benson, Leora

AU - Driggin, Elissa

AU - Kolbe, Laura

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - Objective Eating behavior traits measured in early life predict eating behavior and weight trajectories later in development, and may be associated with certain parental feeding behaviors. Our goal was to investigate the relationship between a range of feeding behaviors, and preschoolers' appetitive traits.Method Four hundred thirty-nine parents of UK 3-5 year olds completed scales measuring authoritarian vs. authoritative forms of limiting (Restriction vs. Monitoring) and promoting (Pressuring vs. Prompting) intake, as well as Emotional and Instrumental Feeding. Parents also completed scales measuring child Food responsiveness and Satiety responsiveness. Child BMI z-scores were calculated based on measured heights and weights.Results Parental Restriction was significantly associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p <.001), but parental Monitoring was not. Parental Pressuring was significantly associated with greater child Satiety responsiveness (p <.001), while parental Prompting was not. Parental Instrumental and Emotional feeding were both associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p <.001). All relationships were independent of child BMI z-score.Discussion Prospective data are needed to determine whether the parent-child feeding relationships identified here promote, or protect against, the development of eating pathology in children. However, our results suggest that cross-sectional associations depend on the style (e.g., authoritarian vs. authoritative), as well as the type of feeding behavior measured.

AB - Objective Eating behavior traits measured in early life predict eating behavior and weight trajectories later in development, and may be associated with certain parental feeding behaviors. Our goal was to investigate the relationship between a range of feeding behaviors, and preschoolers' appetitive traits.Method Four hundred thirty-nine parents of UK 3-5 year olds completed scales measuring authoritarian vs. authoritative forms of limiting (Restriction vs. Monitoring) and promoting (Pressuring vs. Prompting) intake, as well as Emotional and Instrumental Feeding. Parents also completed scales measuring child Food responsiveness and Satiety responsiveness. Child BMI z-scores were calculated based on measured heights and weights.Results Parental Restriction was significantly associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p <.001), but parental Monitoring was not. Parental Pressuring was significantly associated with greater child Satiety responsiveness (p <.001), while parental Prompting was not. Parental Instrumental and Emotional feeding were both associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p <.001). All relationships were independent of child BMI z-score.Discussion Prospective data are needed to determine whether the parent-child feeding relationships identified here promote, or protect against, the development of eating pathology in children. However, our results suggest that cross-sectional associations depend on the style (e.g., authoritarian vs. authoritative), as well as the type of feeding behavior measured.

KW - intake regulation

KW - maternal feeding

KW - nonnutritive feeding

KW - overfeeding

KW - parental control over feeding

KW - pressure to eat

KW - restrictive feeding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916929257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916929257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/eat.22324

DO - 10.1002/eat.22324

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 705

EP - 709

JO - International Journal of Eating Disorders

JF - International Journal of Eating Disorders

SN - 0276-3478

IS - 7

ER -