Painful cutaneous laser stimuli induce event-related oscillatory EEG activities that are different from those induced by nonpainful electrical stimuli

J. H. Chien, C. C. Liu, J. H. Kim, T. M. Markman, Frederick Lenz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The non-phase-locked EEG response to painful stimuli has usually been characterized as decreased oscillatory activity (event-related desynchronization, ERD) in the alpha band. Increased activity (event-related synchronization, ERS) in the gamma band has been reported more recently. We have now tested the hypothesis that the non-phase-locked responses to nonpainful electric cutaneous stimuli are different from those to painful cutaneous laser stimuli when the baseline salience of the two stimuli is the same and the salience during the protocol is modulated by count laser and count electric tasks. Both of these stimuli were presented in random order in a single train at intensities that produced the same baseline salience in the same somatic location. The response to the laser stimulus was characterized by five windows (designated windows I-V) in the time-frequency domain: early (200-400 ms) and late (600-1, 400 ms) delta/theta ERS, 500-900 ms alpha ERD, 1, 200-1, 600 ms beta ERS (rebound), and 800-1, 200 ms gamma ERS. Similar ERS/ERD windows of activity were found for the electric stimulus. Individual participants very commonly had activity in windows consistent with the overall analysis. Linear regression of ERS/ERD for parietal channels was most commonly found for sensory (pain or unpleasantness)- or attention (salience)-related measures. Overall, the main effect for modality was found in window I-delta/theta and window V-gamma, and the Modality with Task interaction was found in all five windows. All significant interaction terms included Modality as a factor. Therefore, Modality was the most common factor explaining our results, which is consistent with our hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)824-833
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume112
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2014

Fingerprint

Electroencephalography
Lasers
Skin
Linear Models
Pain

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Cortex
  • EEG
  • Event-related synchronization
  • Human
  • Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Painful cutaneous laser stimuli induce event-related oscillatory EEG activities that are different from those induced by nonpainful electrical stimuli. / Chien, J. H.; Liu, C. C.; Kim, J. H.; Markman, T. M.; Lenz, Frederick.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 112, No. 4, 15.08.2014, p. 824-833.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3733c3adf7f94efa806e06cb65a1a665,
title = "Painful cutaneous laser stimuli induce event-related oscillatory EEG activities that are different from those induced by nonpainful electrical stimuli",
abstract = "The non-phase-locked EEG response to painful stimuli has usually been characterized as decreased oscillatory activity (event-related desynchronization, ERD) in the alpha band. Increased activity (event-related synchronization, ERS) in the gamma band has been reported more recently. We have now tested the hypothesis that the non-phase-locked responses to nonpainful electric cutaneous stimuli are different from those to painful cutaneous laser stimuli when the baseline salience of the two stimuli is the same and the salience during the protocol is modulated by count laser and count electric tasks. Both of these stimuli were presented in random order in a single train at intensities that produced the same baseline salience in the same somatic location. The response to the laser stimulus was characterized by five windows (designated windows I-V) in the time-frequency domain: early (200-400 ms) and late (600-1, 400 ms) delta/theta ERS, 500-900 ms alpha ERD, 1, 200-1, 600 ms beta ERS (rebound), and 800-1, 200 ms gamma ERS. Similar ERS/ERD windows of activity were found for the electric stimulus. Individual participants very commonly had activity in windows consistent with the overall analysis. Linear regression of ERS/ERD for parietal channels was most commonly found for sensory (pain or unpleasantness)- or attention (salience)-related measures. Overall, the main effect for modality was found in window I-delta/theta and window V-gamma, and the Modality with Task interaction was found in all five windows. All significant interaction terms included Modality as a factor. Therefore, Modality was the most common factor explaining our results, which is consistent with our hypothesis.",
keywords = "Attention, Cortex, EEG, Event-related synchronization, Human, Pain",
author = "Chien, {J. H.} and Liu, {C. C.} and Kim, {J. H.} and Markman, {T. M.} and Frederick Lenz",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1152/jn.00209.2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "824--833",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Painful cutaneous laser stimuli induce event-related oscillatory EEG activities that are different from those induced by nonpainful electrical stimuli

AU - Chien, J. H.

AU - Liu, C. C.

AU - Kim, J. H.

AU - Markman, T. M.

AU - Lenz, Frederick

PY - 2014/8/15

Y1 - 2014/8/15

N2 - The non-phase-locked EEG response to painful stimuli has usually been characterized as decreased oscillatory activity (event-related desynchronization, ERD) in the alpha band. Increased activity (event-related synchronization, ERS) in the gamma band has been reported more recently. We have now tested the hypothesis that the non-phase-locked responses to nonpainful electric cutaneous stimuli are different from those to painful cutaneous laser stimuli when the baseline salience of the two stimuli is the same and the salience during the protocol is modulated by count laser and count electric tasks. Both of these stimuli were presented in random order in a single train at intensities that produced the same baseline salience in the same somatic location. The response to the laser stimulus was characterized by five windows (designated windows I-V) in the time-frequency domain: early (200-400 ms) and late (600-1, 400 ms) delta/theta ERS, 500-900 ms alpha ERD, 1, 200-1, 600 ms beta ERS (rebound), and 800-1, 200 ms gamma ERS. Similar ERS/ERD windows of activity were found for the electric stimulus. Individual participants very commonly had activity in windows consistent with the overall analysis. Linear regression of ERS/ERD for parietal channels was most commonly found for sensory (pain or unpleasantness)- or attention (salience)-related measures. Overall, the main effect for modality was found in window I-delta/theta and window V-gamma, and the Modality with Task interaction was found in all five windows. All significant interaction terms included Modality as a factor. Therefore, Modality was the most common factor explaining our results, which is consistent with our hypothesis.

AB - The non-phase-locked EEG response to painful stimuli has usually been characterized as decreased oscillatory activity (event-related desynchronization, ERD) in the alpha band. Increased activity (event-related synchronization, ERS) in the gamma band has been reported more recently. We have now tested the hypothesis that the non-phase-locked responses to nonpainful electric cutaneous stimuli are different from those to painful cutaneous laser stimuli when the baseline salience of the two stimuli is the same and the salience during the protocol is modulated by count laser and count electric tasks. Both of these stimuli were presented in random order in a single train at intensities that produced the same baseline salience in the same somatic location. The response to the laser stimulus was characterized by five windows (designated windows I-V) in the time-frequency domain: early (200-400 ms) and late (600-1, 400 ms) delta/theta ERS, 500-900 ms alpha ERD, 1, 200-1, 600 ms beta ERS (rebound), and 800-1, 200 ms gamma ERS. Similar ERS/ERD windows of activity were found for the electric stimulus. Individual participants very commonly had activity in windows consistent with the overall analysis. Linear regression of ERS/ERD for parietal channels was most commonly found for sensory (pain or unpleasantness)- or attention (salience)-related measures. Overall, the main effect for modality was found in window I-delta/theta and window V-gamma, and the Modality with Task interaction was found in all five windows. All significant interaction terms included Modality as a factor. Therefore, Modality was the most common factor explaining our results, which is consistent with our hypothesis.

KW - Attention

KW - Cortex

KW - EEG

KW - Event-related synchronization

KW - Human

KW - Pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906078484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906078484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00209.2014

DO - 10.1152/jn.00209.2014

M3 - Article

C2 - 24848464

AN - SCOPUS:84906078484

VL - 112

SP - 824

EP - 833

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 4

ER -