Pain management for blunt thoracic trauma: A joint practice management guideline from the eastern association for the surgery of trauma and trauma anesthesiology society

Samuel M. Galvagno, Charles E. Smith, Albert J. Varon, Erik Anton Hasenboehler, Shahnaz Sultan, Gregory Shaefer, Kathleen B. To, Adam Fox, Darrell E R Alley, Michael Ditillo, Bellal A. Joseph, Bryce R H Robinson, Elliott Haut

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic trauma is the second most prevalent non-intentional injury in the United States, and is associated with significant morbidity. Analgesia for blunt thoracic trauma was first addressed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) with a practice management guideline published in 2005. Since that time, it was hypothesized that there have been advances in the analgesic management for blunt thoracic trauma. As a result, updated guidelines for this topic using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework recently adopted by EAST are presented. METHODS: Five systematic reviews were conducted using multiple databases. The search retrieved articles regarding analgesia for blunt thoracic trauma from January1967 to August 2015. Critical outcomes of interest were analgesia, postoperative pulmonary complications, changes in pulmonary function tests, need for endotracheal intubation, and mortality. Important outcomes of interest examined included hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. RESULTS: Seventy articles were identified. Of these, 28 articles were selected to construct the guidelines. The overall risk of bias for all studies was high. The majority of included studies examined epidural analgesia. Epidural analgesia was associated with lower short-term pain scores in most studies, but the quality and quantity of evidence was very low, and no firm evidence of benefit or harm was found when this modality was compared with other analgesic interventions. The quality of evidence for paravertebral block, intrapleural analgesia, multimodal analgesia, and intercostal nerve blocks was very low as assessed by GRADE. The limitations with the available literature precluded the formulation of strong recommendations by our panel. CONCLUSION: We propose two evidence-based recommendations regarding analgesia for patients with blunt thoracic trauma. The overall risk of bias for all studies was high. The limitations with the available literature precluded the formulation of strong recommendations by our panel. We conditionally recommend epidural analgesia and multimodal analgesia as options for patients with blunt thoracic trauma, but the overall quality of evidence supporting these modalities is low in trauma patients. These recommendations are based on very low quality evidence but place a high value on patient preferences for analgesia. These recommendations are in contradistinction to the previously published Practice Management Guideline published by EAST.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Aug 16 2016

Fingerprint

Anesthesiology
Practice Management
Pain Management
Practice Guidelines
Thorax
Joints
Analgesia
Wounds and Injuries
Epidural Analgesia
Analgesics
Interpleural Analgesia
Intercostal Nerves
Guidelines
Intratracheal Intubation
Patient Preference
Nerve Block
Respiratory Function Tests
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Pain management for blunt thoracic trauma : A joint practice management guideline from the eastern association for the surgery of trauma and trauma anesthesiology society. / Galvagno, Samuel M.; Smith, Charles E.; Varon, Albert J.; Hasenboehler, Erik Anton; Sultan, Shahnaz; Shaefer, Gregory; To, Kathleen B.; Fox, Adam; Alley, Darrell E R; Ditillo, Michael; Joseph, Bellal A.; Robinson, Bryce R H; Haut, Elliott.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 16.08.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Galvagno, Samuel M. ; Smith, Charles E. ; Varon, Albert J. ; Hasenboehler, Erik Anton ; Sultan, Shahnaz ; Shaefer, Gregory ; To, Kathleen B. ; Fox, Adam ; Alley, Darrell E R ; Ditillo, Michael ; Joseph, Bellal A. ; Robinson, Bryce R H ; Haut, Elliott. / Pain management for blunt thoracic trauma : A joint practice management guideline from the eastern association for the surgery of trauma and trauma anesthesiology society. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2016.
@article{9c9030ead575467faaa88184c94a539b,
title = "Pain management for blunt thoracic trauma: A joint practice management guideline from the eastern association for the surgery of trauma and trauma anesthesiology society",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Thoracic trauma is the second most prevalent non-intentional injury in the United States, and is associated with significant morbidity. Analgesia for blunt thoracic trauma was first addressed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) with a practice management guideline published in 2005. Since that time, it was hypothesized that there have been advances in the analgesic management for blunt thoracic trauma. As a result, updated guidelines for this topic using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework recently adopted by EAST are presented. METHODS: Five systematic reviews were conducted using multiple databases. The search retrieved articles regarding analgesia for blunt thoracic trauma from January1967 to August 2015. Critical outcomes of interest were analgesia, postoperative pulmonary complications, changes in pulmonary function tests, need for endotracheal intubation, and mortality. Important outcomes of interest examined included hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. RESULTS: Seventy articles were identified. Of these, 28 articles were selected to construct the guidelines. The overall risk of bias for all studies was high. The majority of included studies examined epidural analgesia. Epidural analgesia was associated with lower short-term pain scores in most studies, but the quality and quantity of evidence was very low, and no firm evidence of benefit or harm was found when this modality was compared with other analgesic interventions. The quality of evidence for paravertebral block, intrapleural analgesia, multimodal analgesia, and intercostal nerve blocks was very low as assessed by GRADE. The limitations with the available literature precluded the formulation of strong recommendations by our panel. CONCLUSION: We propose two evidence-based recommendations regarding analgesia for patients with blunt thoracic trauma. The overall risk of bias for all studies was high. The limitations with the available literature precluded the formulation of strong recommendations by our panel. We conditionally recommend epidural analgesia and multimodal analgesia as options for patients with blunt thoracic trauma, but the overall quality of evidence supporting these modalities is low in trauma patients. These recommendations are based on very low quality evidence but place a high value on patient preferences for analgesia. These recommendations are in contradistinction to the previously published Practice Management Guideline published by EAST.",
author = "Galvagno, {Samuel M.} and Smith, {Charles E.} and Varon, {Albert J.} and Hasenboehler, {Erik Anton} and Shahnaz Sultan and Gregory Shaefer and To, {Kathleen B.} and Adam Fox and Alley, {Darrell E R} and Michael Ditillo and Joseph, {Bellal A.} and Robinson, {Bryce R H} and Elliott Haut",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000001209",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pain management for blunt thoracic trauma

T2 - A joint practice management guideline from the eastern association for the surgery of trauma and trauma anesthesiology society

AU - Galvagno, Samuel M.

AU - Smith, Charles E.

AU - Varon, Albert J.

AU - Hasenboehler, Erik Anton

AU - Sultan, Shahnaz

AU - Shaefer, Gregory

AU - To, Kathleen B.

AU - Fox, Adam

AU - Alley, Darrell E R

AU - Ditillo, Michael

AU - Joseph, Bellal A.

AU - Robinson, Bryce R H

AU - Haut, Elliott

PY - 2016/8/16

Y1 - 2016/8/16

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Thoracic trauma is the second most prevalent non-intentional injury in the United States, and is associated with significant morbidity. Analgesia for blunt thoracic trauma was first addressed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) with a practice management guideline published in 2005. Since that time, it was hypothesized that there have been advances in the analgesic management for blunt thoracic trauma. As a result, updated guidelines for this topic using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework recently adopted by EAST are presented. METHODS: Five systematic reviews were conducted using multiple databases. The search retrieved articles regarding analgesia for blunt thoracic trauma from January1967 to August 2015. Critical outcomes of interest were analgesia, postoperative pulmonary complications, changes in pulmonary function tests, need for endotracheal intubation, and mortality. Important outcomes of interest examined included hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. RESULTS: Seventy articles were identified. Of these, 28 articles were selected to construct the guidelines. The overall risk of bias for all studies was high. The majority of included studies examined epidural analgesia. Epidural analgesia was associated with lower short-term pain scores in most studies, but the quality and quantity of evidence was very low, and no firm evidence of benefit or harm was found when this modality was compared with other analgesic interventions. The quality of evidence for paravertebral block, intrapleural analgesia, multimodal analgesia, and intercostal nerve blocks was very low as assessed by GRADE. The limitations with the available literature precluded the formulation of strong recommendations by our panel. CONCLUSION: We propose two evidence-based recommendations regarding analgesia for patients with blunt thoracic trauma. The overall risk of bias for all studies was high. The limitations with the available literature precluded the formulation of strong recommendations by our panel. We conditionally recommend epidural analgesia and multimodal analgesia as options for patients with blunt thoracic trauma, but the overall quality of evidence supporting these modalities is low in trauma patients. These recommendations are based on very low quality evidence but place a high value on patient preferences for analgesia. These recommendations are in contradistinction to the previously published Practice Management Guideline published by EAST.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Thoracic trauma is the second most prevalent non-intentional injury in the United States, and is associated with significant morbidity. Analgesia for blunt thoracic trauma was first addressed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) with a practice management guideline published in 2005. Since that time, it was hypothesized that there have been advances in the analgesic management for blunt thoracic trauma. As a result, updated guidelines for this topic using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework recently adopted by EAST are presented. METHODS: Five systematic reviews were conducted using multiple databases. The search retrieved articles regarding analgesia for blunt thoracic trauma from January1967 to August 2015. Critical outcomes of interest were analgesia, postoperative pulmonary complications, changes in pulmonary function tests, need for endotracheal intubation, and mortality. Important outcomes of interest examined included hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. RESULTS: Seventy articles were identified. Of these, 28 articles were selected to construct the guidelines. The overall risk of bias for all studies was high. The majority of included studies examined epidural analgesia. Epidural analgesia was associated with lower short-term pain scores in most studies, but the quality and quantity of evidence was very low, and no firm evidence of benefit or harm was found when this modality was compared with other analgesic interventions. The quality of evidence for paravertebral block, intrapleural analgesia, multimodal analgesia, and intercostal nerve blocks was very low as assessed by GRADE. The limitations with the available literature precluded the formulation of strong recommendations by our panel. CONCLUSION: We propose two evidence-based recommendations regarding analgesia for patients with blunt thoracic trauma. The overall risk of bias for all studies was high. The limitations with the available literature precluded the formulation of strong recommendations by our panel. We conditionally recommend epidural analgesia and multimodal analgesia as options for patients with blunt thoracic trauma, but the overall quality of evidence supporting these modalities is low in trauma patients. These recommendations are based on very low quality evidence but place a high value on patient preferences for analgesia. These recommendations are in contradistinction to the previously published Practice Management Guideline published by EAST.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983089439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983089439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001209

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001209

M3 - Article

C2 - 27533913

AN - SCOPUS:84983089439

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

ER -