Outcomes of internal fixation in a combat environment.

Daniel J. Stinner, James A. Keeney, Joseph R. Hsu, Jeremy K. Rush, Mickey S. Cho, Joseph C. Wenke, James R. Ficke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Due to the nature of the wounds and environment, internal fixation in battlefield treatment facilities is discouraged despite the lack of data. The purpose of this review is to describe the outcomes of fractures that were internally fixed in the combat environment. The records of patients who had internal fixation performed in the theater of combat operations were reviewed. Demographics, injury characteristics, procedure history, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Forty-seven patients had internal fixation performed on 50 fractures in a combat theater hospital. Hip, forearm, and ankle fractures made up the majority of cases with 14 (28%), 14 (28%), and 10 (20%), respectively. Sixteen (32%) fractures were open. The average Injury Severity Score was 11.4 +/- 1.1 (range, 4-34). Thirty-nine fractures (78%) healed without incidence. There was one (2%) infection and one (2%) acute surgical complication. Ten (20%) fractures, including the one infection, required additional procedures. Because internal fixation in the combat environment was used judiciously, complications were not higher than previously reported.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-53
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of surgical orthopaedic advances
Volume19
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of internal fixation in a combat environment.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this