Outcomes in two Massachusetts hospital systems give reason for optimism about communication- and-resolution programs

Michelle M. Mello, Allen Kachalia, Stephanie Roche, Melinda Van Niel, Lisa Buchsbaum, Suzanne Dodson, Patricia Folcarelli, Evan M. Benjamin, Kenneth E. Sands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Through communication-and-resolution programs, hospitals and liability insurers communicate with patients when adverse events occur; investigate and explain what happened; and, where appropriate, apologize and proactively offer compensation. Using data recorded by program staff members and from surveys of involved clinicians, we examined case outcomes of a program used by two academic medical centers and two of their community hospitals in Massachusetts in the period 2013-15. The hospitals demonstrated good adherence to the program protocol. Ninety-one percent of the program events did not meet compensation eligibility criteria, and those events that did were not costly to resolve (the median payment was $75,000). Only 5 percent of events led to malpractice claims or lawsuits. Clinicians were supportive of the program but desired better communication about it from staff members. Our findings suggest that communication-and-resolution programs will not lead to higher liability costs when hospitals adhere to their commitment to offer compensation proactively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1795-1803
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume36
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Compensation and Redress
Communication
Insurance Carriers
Hospital Costs
Malpractice
Community Hospital
Optimism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Outcomes in two Massachusetts hospital systems give reason for optimism about communication- and-resolution programs. / Mello, Michelle M.; Kachalia, Allen; Roche, Stephanie; Van Niel, Melinda; Buchsbaum, Lisa; Dodson, Suzanne; Folcarelli, Patricia; Benjamin, Evan M.; Sands, Kenneth E.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 36, No. 10, 01.10.2017, p. 1795-1803.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mello, MM, Kachalia, A, Roche, S, Van Niel, M, Buchsbaum, L, Dodson, S, Folcarelli, P, Benjamin, EM & Sands, KE 2017, 'Outcomes in two Massachusetts hospital systems give reason for optimism about communication- and-resolution programs', Health Affairs, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1795-1803. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0320
Mello, Michelle M. ; Kachalia, Allen ; Roche, Stephanie ; Van Niel, Melinda ; Buchsbaum, Lisa ; Dodson, Suzanne ; Folcarelli, Patricia ; Benjamin, Evan M. ; Sands, Kenneth E. / Outcomes in two Massachusetts hospital systems give reason for optimism about communication- and-resolution programs. In: Health Affairs. 2017 ; Vol. 36, No. 10. pp. 1795-1803.
@article{afde49859a954d388f34bba223cb0bac,
title = "Outcomes in two Massachusetts hospital systems give reason for optimism about communication- and-resolution programs",
abstract = "Through communication-and-resolution programs, hospitals and liability insurers communicate with patients when adverse events occur; investigate and explain what happened; and, where appropriate, apologize and proactively offer compensation. Using data recorded by program staff members and from surveys of involved clinicians, we examined case outcomes of a program used by two academic medical centers and two of their community hospitals in Massachusetts in the period 2013-15. The hospitals demonstrated good adherence to the program protocol. Ninety-one percent of the program events did not meet compensation eligibility criteria, and those events that did were not costly to resolve (the median payment was $75,000). Only 5 percent of events led to malpractice claims or lawsuits. Clinicians were supportive of the program but desired better communication about it from staff members. Our findings suggest that communication-and-resolution programs will not lead to higher liability costs when hospitals adhere to their commitment to offer compensation proactively.",
author = "Mello, {Michelle M.} and Allen Kachalia and Stephanie Roche and {Van Niel}, Melinda and Lisa Buchsbaum and Suzanne Dodson and Patricia Folcarelli and Benjamin, {Evan M.} and Sands, {Kenneth E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0320",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "1795--1803",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes in two Massachusetts hospital systems give reason for optimism about communication- and-resolution programs

AU - Mello, Michelle M.

AU - Kachalia, Allen

AU - Roche, Stephanie

AU - Van Niel, Melinda

AU - Buchsbaum, Lisa

AU - Dodson, Suzanne

AU - Folcarelli, Patricia

AU - Benjamin, Evan M.

AU - Sands, Kenneth E.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Through communication-and-resolution programs, hospitals and liability insurers communicate with patients when adverse events occur; investigate and explain what happened; and, where appropriate, apologize and proactively offer compensation. Using data recorded by program staff members and from surveys of involved clinicians, we examined case outcomes of a program used by two academic medical centers and two of their community hospitals in Massachusetts in the period 2013-15. The hospitals demonstrated good adherence to the program protocol. Ninety-one percent of the program events did not meet compensation eligibility criteria, and those events that did were not costly to resolve (the median payment was $75,000). Only 5 percent of events led to malpractice claims or lawsuits. Clinicians were supportive of the program but desired better communication about it from staff members. Our findings suggest that communication-and-resolution programs will not lead to higher liability costs when hospitals adhere to their commitment to offer compensation proactively.

AB - Through communication-and-resolution programs, hospitals and liability insurers communicate with patients when adverse events occur; investigate and explain what happened; and, where appropriate, apologize and proactively offer compensation. Using data recorded by program staff members and from surveys of involved clinicians, we examined case outcomes of a program used by two academic medical centers and two of their community hospitals in Massachusetts in the period 2013-15. The hospitals demonstrated good adherence to the program protocol. Ninety-one percent of the program events did not meet compensation eligibility criteria, and those events that did were not costly to resolve (the median payment was $75,000). Only 5 percent of events led to malpractice claims or lawsuits. Clinicians were supportive of the program but desired better communication about it from staff members. Our findings suggest that communication-and-resolution programs will not lead to higher liability costs when hospitals adhere to their commitment to offer compensation proactively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030461133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030461133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0320

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0320

M3 - Article

C2 - 28971925

AN - SCOPUS:85030461133

VL - 36

SP - 1795

EP - 1803

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 10

ER -