Outcomes and perception of a conventional and alternative myoelectric control strategy: A study of experienced and new multiarticulating hand users

Martin Vilarino, Jayet Moon, Kasey Rogner Pool, Joby Varghese, Tiffany Ryan, Nitish V Thakor, Rahul Kaliki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: The development of multiarticulating hands holds the potential to restore lost function for upper-limb amputees. However, access to the full potential of commercialized devices is limited due to conventional control strategies for switching prosthesis modes, such as hand grips. For example, to switch grips in one conventional strategy, the prosthesis user must generate electromyogram (EMG) triggers (such as a cocontraction), which are cumbersome and nonintuitive. For this reason, alternative control strategies have emerged, which seek to facilitate grip switching. One specific application uses radio frequency identification (RFID) tags programmed with grip information. These tags can be placed on objects in the environment or carried on person. Upon approaching an RFID tag, the user's prosthesis reads the grip programmed on the tag and commands the hand into that grip. The purpose of this study was to compare the conventional strategy (using EMG triggers) with the alternative strategy (using RFID tags). Methods: The study evaluated three subjects: two users who actively use multiarticulating hands ("experienced" users) and one user who had never worn a multiarticulating hand ("new" user). Subjects were evaluated on two performance metrics: trigger completion time and the percentage of triggers that were successful on first attempt (first attempt success rate). Subjects also rated the difficulty, effort, and frustration with each strategy. Results: Results suggested faster trigger completion times with the EMG strategy for the experienced users and mixed results for the new user. Overall, the three subjects rated the RFID strategy as less difficult, tiring, and frustrating than the EMG strategy. Discussion and Conclusions: Continued studies with a larger subject pool are necessary to determine factors influencing performance and patient preference. This would allow identification of best strategies to access the full potential of new commercial devices. Still, the authors suggest that the synergistic use of both strategies can yield great benefits for both experienced and new multiarticulating hand users.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-62
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 28 2015

Fingerprint

Hand Strength
Radio frequency identification (RFID)
Radio Frequency Identification Device
Hand
Electromyography
Prostheses and Implants
Amputees
Equipment and Supplies
Frustration
Patient Preference
Switches
Upper Extremity

Keywords

  • electromyography
  • multiarticulating hand
  • myoelectric
  • patient satisfaction
  • prosthesis control strategy
  • Prosthetics
  • radio frequency identification
  • upper limb

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Outcomes and perception of a conventional and alternative myoelectric control strategy : A study of experienced and new multiarticulating hand users. / Vilarino, Martin; Moon, Jayet; Rogner Pool, Kasey; Varghese, Joby; Ryan, Tiffany; Thakor, Nitish V; Kaliki, Rahul.

In: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Vol. 27, No. 2, 28.04.2015, p. 53-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vilarino, Martin ; Moon, Jayet ; Rogner Pool, Kasey ; Varghese, Joby ; Ryan, Tiffany ; Thakor, Nitish V ; Kaliki, Rahul. / Outcomes and perception of a conventional and alternative myoelectric control strategy : A study of experienced and new multiarticulating hand users. In: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 2015 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 53-62.
@article{52e9415810cd4739855ffc404950e623,
title = "Outcomes and perception of a conventional and alternative myoelectric control strategy: A study of experienced and new multiarticulating hand users",
abstract = "Introduction: The development of multiarticulating hands holds the potential to restore lost function for upper-limb amputees. However, access to the full potential of commercialized devices is limited due to conventional control strategies for switching prosthesis modes, such as hand grips. For example, to switch grips in one conventional strategy, the prosthesis user must generate electromyogram (EMG) triggers (such as a cocontraction), which are cumbersome and nonintuitive. For this reason, alternative control strategies have emerged, which seek to facilitate grip switching. One specific application uses radio frequency identification (RFID) tags programmed with grip information. These tags can be placed on objects in the environment or carried on person. Upon approaching an RFID tag, the user's prosthesis reads the grip programmed on the tag and commands the hand into that grip. The purpose of this study was to compare the conventional strategy (using EMG triggers) with the alternative strategy (using RFID tags). Methods: The study evaluated three subjects: two users who actively use multiarticulating hands ({"}experienced{"} users) and one user who had never worn a multiarticulating hand ({"}new{"} user). Subjects were evaluated on two performance metrics: trigger completion time and the percentage of triggers that were successful on first attempt (first attempt success rate). Subjects also rated the difficulty, effort, and frustration with each strategy. Results: Results suggested faster trigger completion times with the EMG strategy for the experienced users and mixed results for the new user. Overall, the three subjects rated the RFID strategy as less difficult, tiring, and frustrating than the EMG strategy. Discussion and Conclusions: Continued studies with a larger subject pool are necessary to determine factors influencing performance and patient preference. This would allow identification of best strategies to access the full potential of new commercial devices. Still, the authors suggest that the synergistic use of both strategies can yield great benefits for both experienced and new multiarticulating hand users.",
keywords = "electromyography, multiarticulating hand, myoelectric, patient satisfaction, prosthesis control strategy, Prosthetics, radio frequency identification, upper limb",
author = "Martin Vilarino and Jayet Moon and {Rogner Pool}, Kasey and Joby Varghese and Tiffany Ryan and Thakor, {Nitish V} and Rahul Kaliki",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1097/JPO.0000000000000055",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "53--62",
journal = "Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics",
issn = "1040-8800",
publisher = "American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists (AAOP)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes and perception of a conventional and alternative myoelectric control strategy

T2 - A study of experienced and new multiarticulating hand users

AU - Vilarino, Martin

AU - Moon, Jayet

AU - Rogner Pool, Kasey

AU - Varghese, Joby

AU - Ryan, Tiffany

AU - Thakor, Nitish V

AU - Kaliki, Rahul

PY - 2015/4/28

Y1 - 2015/4/28

N2 - Introduction: The development of multiarticulating hands holds the potential to restore lost function for upper-limb amputees. However, access to the full potential of commercialized devices is limited due to conventional control strategies for switching prosthesis modes, such as hand grips. For example, to switch grips in one conventional strategy, the prosthesis user must generate electromyogram (EMG) triggers (such as a cocontraction), which are cumbersome and nonintuitive. For this reason, alternative control strategies have emerged, which seek to facilitate grip switching. One specific application uses radio frequency identification (RFID) tags programmed with grip information. These tags can be placed on objects in the environment or carried on person. Upon approaching an RFID tag, the user's prosthesis reads the grip programmed on the tag and commands the hand into that grip. The purpose of this study was to compare the conventional strategy (using EMG triggers) with the alternative strategy (using RFID tags). Methods: The study evaluated three subjects: two users who actively use multiarticulating hands ("experienced" users) and one user who had never worn a multiarticulating hand ("new" user). Subjects were evaluated on two performance metrics: trigger completion time and the percentage of triggers that were successful on first attempt (first attempt success rate). Subjects also rated the difficulty, effort, and frustration with each strategy. Results: Results suggested faster trigger completion times with the EMG strategy for the experienced users and mixed results for the new user. Overall, the three subjects rated the RFID strategy as less difficult, tiring, and frustrating than the EMG strategy. Discussion and Conclusions: Continued studies with a larger subject pool are necessary to determine factors influencing performance and patient preference. This would allow identification of best strategies to access the full potential of new commercial devices. Still, the authors suggest that the synergistic use of both strategies can yield great benefits for both experienced and new multiarticulating hand users.

AB - Introduction: The development of multiarticulating hands holds the potential to restore lost function for upper-limb amputees. However, access to the full potential of commercialized devices is limited due to conventional control strategies for switching prosthesis modes, such as hand grips. For example, to switch grips in one conventional strategy, the prosthesis user must generate electromyogram (EMG) triggers (such as a cocontraction), which are cumbersome and nonintuitive. For this reason, alternative control strategies have emerged, which seek to facilitate grip switching. One specific application uses radio frequency identification (RFID) tags programmed with grip information. These tags can be placed on objects in the environment or carried on person. Upon approaching an RFID tag, the user's prosthesis reads the grip programmed on the tag and commands the hand into that grip. The purpose of this study was to compare the conventional strategy (using EMG triggers) with the alternative strategy (using RFID tags). Methods: The study evaluated three subjects: two users who actively use multiarticulating hands ("experienced" users) and one user who had never worn a multiarticulating hand ("new" user). Subjects were evaluated on two performance metrics: trigger completion time and the percentage of triggers that were successful on first attempt (first attempt success rate). Subjects also rated the difficulty, effort, and frustration with each strategy. Results: Results suggested faster trigger completion times with the EMG strategy for the experienced users and mixed results for the new user. Overall, the three subjects rated the RFID strategy as less difficult, tiring, and frustrating than the EMG strategy. Discussion and Conclusions: Continued studies with a larger subject pool are necessary to determine factors influencing performance and patient preference. This would allow identification of best strategies to access the full potential of new commercial devices. Still, the authors suggest that the synergistic use of both strategies can yield great benefits for both experienced and new multiarticulating hand users.

KW - electromyography

KW - multiarticulating hand

KW - myoelectric

KW - patient satisfaction

KW - prosthesis control strategy

KW - Prosthetics

KW - radio frequency identification

KW - upper limb

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925594567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925594567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000055

DO - 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000055

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84925594567

VL - 27

SP - 53

EP - 62

JO - Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics

JF - Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics

SN - 1040-8800

IS - 2

ER -