Oral rehydration therapy for acute diarrhea in ambulatory children in the United States: A double-blind comparison of four different solutions

M. Santosham, B. Burns, V. Nadkarni, S. Foster, S. Garrett, L. Croll, J. C. O'Donovan, R. Pathak, R. B. Sack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

Oral rehydration solutions containing 50 to 90 mmol/L of sodium have recently been recommended for the treatment of diarrhea in both hospitalized and ambulatory children in the United States. Few data are available, however, from ambulatory US children. Therefore, we conducted a randomized double-blind study comparing the use of four different oral rehydration solutions with differing concentrations of sodium, glucose, and base. Ambulatory children less than 2 years of age with acute diarrhea (N = 140) were randomly chosen to receive solutions containing sodium at 90 (solution A), 50 (solution B), and 30 mmol/L (solutions C and D). All oral rehydration solutions contained 20 g/L of glucose except solution D which contained 50 g/L of glucose. Solution A contained bicarbonate as its base source whereas the other three contained citrate. All but three (98%) children were treated uneventfully according to the study protocol, and there were no differences among groups in measurements of clinical outcome. It was concluded that in ambulatory US children, oral rehydration solutions containing 90, 50, or 30 mmol/L of sodium can be used safely for the treatment of mild acute diarrhea and that citrate is as efficacious as bicarbonate in the correction of acidosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-166
Number of pages8
JournalPediatrics
Volume76
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1985

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Oral rehydration therapy for acute diarrhea in ambulatory children in the United States: A double-blind comparison of four different solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this