Optimized quadrature surface coil designs

Ananda Kumar, Paul A. Bottomley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Quadrature surface MRI/MRS detectors comprised of circular loop and figure-8 or butterfly-shaped coils offer improved signal-to-noise-ratios (SNR) compared to single surface coils, and reduced power and specific absorption rates (SAR) when used for MRI excitation. While the radius of the optimum loop coil for performing MRI at depth d in a sample is known, the optimum geometry for figure-8 and butterfly coils is not. Materials and methods: The geometries of figure-8 and square butterfly detector coils that deliver the optimum SNR are determined numerically by the electromagnetic method of moments. Figure-8 and loop detectors are then combined to create SNR-optimized quadrature detectors whose theoretical and experimental SNR performance are compared with a novel quadrature detector comprised of a strip and a loop, and with two overlapped loops optimized for the same depth at 3 T. The quadrature detection efficiency and local SAR during transmission for the three quadrature configurations are analyzed and compared. Results: The SNR-optimized figure-8 detector has loop radius r 8 ∼ 0.6d, so r 8/r 0 ∼ 1.3 in an optimized quadrature detector at 3 T. The optimized butterfly coil has side length ∼ d and crossover angle of ≥ 150° at the center. Conclusions: These new design rules for figure-8 and butterfly coils optimize their performance as linear and quadrature detectors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-52
Number of pages12
JournalMagnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
Volume21
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

Keywords

  • MR surface coils
  • Quadrature detectors
  • SNR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Optimized quadrature surface coil designs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this