Optimal Resistance Training: Comparison of DeLorme with Oxford Techniques

David E. Fish, Brian J. Krabak, Doug Johnson-Greene, Barbara Jane De Lateur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Progressive resistive exercises, such as the DeLorme or Oxford techniques, improve strength by adding weights to arrive at the ten-repetition maximum (10RM; DeLorme) or by starting at the 10RM and removing weight (Oxford). The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of each training method. Design: In this randomized, prospective, group design, evaluator-blind clinical trial, 50 subjects performed either the Oxford or DeLorme weight-training techniques. Three times a week for 9 wks, subjects completed three sets of ten-repetition knee extensions based on the 10RM measured weekly. Incremental or decremental changes in training weight were utilized in training sessions based on the protocol randomly assigned to each subject. Results: The mean 10RM increase was 71.9 kg for the DeLorme group and 67.5 kg for the Oxford group, which was not significantly different. Examination with repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance revealed no significant difference between the two groups for 10RM increase, and no significant sex differences were found. Percentage change scores were not significantly different for 1RM and 10RM for both protocols and sexes. Conclusion: Both protocol groups were able to complete their lifting assignments and progressed similarly in weekly 10RM weight lifted. It can be concluded that both the DeLorme and Oxford protocols improve strength with equivalent efficacy. Further studies involving a larger sample size are needed to address potential sex-specific changes in strength improvement in response to the protocols.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)903-909
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume82
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

Resistance Training
Weights and Measures
Sex Characteristics
Sample Size
Knee
Analysis of Variance
Teaching
Multivariate Analysis
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • Conditioning
  • Exercise
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Optimal Resistance Training : Comparison of DeLorme with Oxford Techniques. / Fish, David E.; Krabak, Brian J.; Johnson-Greene, Doug; De Lateur, Barbara Jane.

In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 82, No. 12, 12.2003, p. 903-909.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fish, David E. ; Krabak, Brian J. ; Johnson-Greene, Doug ; De Lateur, Barbara Jane. / Optimal Resistance Training : Comparison of DeLorme with Oxford Techniques. In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003 ; Vol. 82, No. 12. pp. 903-909.
@article{453a7b6a21924a67bfcb5a90c23abc33,
title = "Optimal Resistance Training: Comparison of DeLorme with Oxford Techniques",
abstract = "Objective: Progressive resistive exercises, such as the DeLorme or Oxford techniques, improve strength by adding weights to arrive at the ten-repetition maximum (10RM; DeLorme) or by starting at the 10RM and removing weight (Oxford). The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of each training method. Design: In this randomized, prospective, group design, evaluator-blind clinical trial, 50 subjects performed either the Oxford or DeLorme weight-training techniques. Three times a week for 9 wks, subjects completed three sets of ten-repetition knee extensions based on the 10RM measured weekly. Incremental or decremental changes in training weight were utilized in training sessions based on the protocol randomly assigned to each subject. Results: The mean 10RM increase was 71.9 kg for the DeLorme group and 67.5 kg for the Oxford group, which was not significantly different. Examination with repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance revealed no significant difference between the two groups for 10RM increase, and no significant sex differences were found. Percentage change scores were not significantly different for 1RM and 10RM for both protocols and sexes. Conclusion: Both protocol groups were able to complete their lifting assignments and progressed similarly in weekly 10RM weight lifted. It can be concluded that both the DeLorme and Oxford protocols improve strength with equivalent efficacy. Further studies involving a larger sample size are needed to address potential sex-specific changes in strength improvement in response to the protocols.",
keywords = "Conditioning, Exercise, Rehabilitation",
author = "Fish, {David E.} and Krabak, {Brian J.} and Doug Johnson-Greene and {De Lateur}, {Barbara Jane}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/01.PHM.0000098505.57264.DB",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "903--909",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal Resistance Training

T2 - Comparison of DeLorme with Oxford Techniques

AU - Fish, David E.

AU - Krabak, Brian J.

AU - Johnson-Greene, Doug

AU - De Lateur, Barbara Jane

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - Objective: Progressive resistive exercises, such as the DeLorme or Oxford techniques, improve strength by adding weights to arrive at the ten-repetition maximum (10RM; DeLorme) or by starting at the 10RM and removing weight (Oxford). The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of each training method. Design: In this randomized, prospective, group design, evaluator-blind clinical trial, 50 subjects performed either the Oxford or DeLorme weight-training techniques. Three times a week for 9 wks, subjects completed three sets of ten-repetition knee extensions based on the 10RM measured weekly. Incremental or decremental changes in training weight were utilized in training sessions based on the protocol randomly assigned to each subject. Results: The mean 10RM increase was 71.9 kg for the DeLorme group and 67.5 kg for the Oxford group, which was not significantly different. Examination with repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance revealed no significant difference between the two groups for 10RM increase, and no significant sex differences were found. Percentage change scores were not significantly different for 1RM and 10RM for both protocols and sexes. Conclusion: Both protocol groups were able to complete their lifting assignments and progressed similarly in weekly 10RM weight lifted. It can be concluded that both the DeLorme and Oxford protocols improve strength with equivalent efficacy. Further studies involving a larger sample size are needed to address potential sex-specific changes in strength improvement in response to the protocols.

AB - Objective: Progressive resistive exercises, such as the DeLorme or Oxford techniques, improve strength by adding weights to arrive at the ten-repetition maximum (10RM; DeLorme) or by starting at the 10RM and removing weight (Oxford). The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of each training method. Design: In this randomized, prospective, group design, evaluator-blind clinical trial, 50 subjects performed either the Oxford or DeLorme weight-training techniques. Three times a week for 9 wks, subjects completed three sets of ten-repetition knee extensions based on the 10RM measured weekly. Incremental or decremental changes in training weight were utilized in training sessions based on the protocol randomly assigned to each subject. Results: The mean 10RM increase was 71.9 kg for the DeLorme group and 67.5 kg for the Oxford group, which was not significantly different. Examination with repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance revealed no significant difference between the two groups for 10RM increase, and no significant sex differences were found. Percentage change scores were not significantly different for 1RM and 10RM for both protocols and sexes. Conclusion: Both protocol groups were able to complete their lifting assignments and progressed similarly in weekly 10RM weight lifted. It can be concluded that both the DeLorme and Oxford protocols improve strength with equivalent efficacy. Further studies involving a larger sample size are needed to address potential sex-specific changes in strength improvement in response to the protocols.

KW - Conditioning

KW - Exercise

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345283154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345283154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.PHM.0000098505.57264.DB

DO - 10.1097/01.PHM.0000098505.57264.DB

M3 - Article

C2 - 14627926

AN - SCOPUS:0345283154

VL - 82

SP - 903

EP - 909

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 12

ER -