TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal Choice of Ultrasound-Based Measurements for the Diagnosis of Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow
T2 - A Meta-Analysis of 1961 Examinations
AU - Haj-Mirzaian, Arya
AU - Hafezi-Nejad, Nima
AU - Grande, Filippo Del
AU - Endo, Yoshimi
AU - Nwawka, O. Kenechi
AU - Miller, Theodore T.
AU - Carrino, John A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Roentgen Ray Society
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal ultrasound (US) measurement technique and cutoff value for the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A systematic literature search was conducted of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of US of patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow before April 2019. Random-effects modeling was performed to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of different US measurements, including diameter and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the nerve at the medial epicondyle or proximal and distal levels, maximal diameter, maximal CSA, and nerve ratios. Sensitivity and metaregression analyses were performed to assess the impact of clinical and imaging-based variables on the DOR of US. RESULTS. Among 820 retrieved studies, 19 studies (1961 examinations) were included. Measuring the CSA of the ulnar nerve at the medial epicondyle with a cutoff value greater than 10–10.5 mm2 had higher sensitivity (80.4%, 95% CI, 75.4–84.7%) than other techniques. Nerve ratios had higher specificity (89.1%, 95% CI, 85.8–91.8%) than other measurements; however, the definition of ratios and cutoff values varied across studies. ROC analysis showed higher diagnostic performance for measuring CSA at the medial epicondyle (AUC, 0.931). The mean CSA value was a significant predictor of the DOR of US (β coefficient, 0.307 ± 0.074; p < 0.001). Every 1-mm2 larger CSA was associated with a 36% increase in DOR. The diagnostic performance of US was the same in any degree of elbow flexion. CONCLUSION. Measuring CSA of the ulnar nerve at the medial epicondyle has sensitivity and diagnostic performance superior to those of other techniques for the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.
AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal ultrasound (US) measurement technique and cutoff value for the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A systematic literature search was conducted of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of US of patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow before April 2019. Random-effects modeling was performed to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of different US measurements, including diameter and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the nerve at the medial epicondyle or proximal and distal levels, maximal diameter, maximal CSA, and nerve ratios. Sensitivity and metaregression analyses were performed to assess the impact of clinical and imaging-based variables on the DOR of US. RESULTS. Among 820 retrieved studies, 19 studies (1961 examinations) were included. Measuring the CSA of the ulnar nerve at the medial epicondyle with a cutoff value greater than 10–10.5 mm2 had higher sensitivity (80.4%, 95% CI, 75.4–84.7%) than other techniques. Nerve ratios had higher specificity (89.1%, 95% CI, 85.8–91.8%) than other measurements; however, the definition of ratios and cutoff values varied across studies. ROC analysis showed higher diagnostic performance for measuring CSA at the medial epicondyle (AUC, 0.931). The mean CSA value was a significant predictor of the DOR of US (β coefficient, 0.307 ± 0.074; p < 0.001). Every 1-mm2 larger CSA was associated with a 36% increase in DOR. The diagnostic performance of US was the same in any degree of elbow flexion. CONCLUSION. Measuring CSA of the ulnar nerve at the medial epicondyle has sensitivity and diagnostic performance superior to those of other techniques for the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.
KW - Diagnostic accuracy
KW - Elbow
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Ulnar neuropathy
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094222091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094222091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/AJR.19.22457
DO - 10.2214/AJR.19.22457
M3 - Article
C2 - 32960671
AN - SCOPUS:85094222091
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 215
SP - 1171
EP - 1183
JO - American Journal of Roentgenology
JF - American Journal of Roentgenology
IS - 5
ER -