Opiate dependence and withdrawal

J. Hughes, Solomon H Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The model proposed by Snyder does not help to explain the paradox that few behavioral alterations are observed when naloxone is given to normal animals, since it would be predicted to cause withdrawal symptoms. This apparent discrepancy may be due to a differential mode of action of morphine and enkephalin at opiate receptors or to the existence of multiple categories of such receptors, as discussed above. There are certain opiates that are much weaker in competing for enkephalin than for naloxone and certain drugs that are about equipotent in this respect. In fact, it has been demonstrated that naloxone is relatively weak against enkephalin binding and potent against morphine binding. This may explain why it is more difficult to reverse the effects of endogenous enkephalin with naloxone than it is to reverse the effects of morphine and it could also explain the absence of naloxone-induced behavioral effects in the normal rat.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)298-299
Number of pages2
JournalNeurosciences Research Program bulletin
Volume16
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1978
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Opioid-Related Disorders
Naloxone
Enkephalins
Morphine
Opiate Alkaloids
Substance Withdrawal Syndrome
Opioid Receptors
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Opiate dependence and withdrawal. / Hughes, J.; Snyder, Solomon H.

In: Neurosciences Research Program bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1978, p. 298-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b33dba1659a1490ea467647626e3ca0a,
title = "Opiate dependence and withdrawal",
abstract = "The model proposed by Snyder does not help to explain the paradox that few behavioral alterations are observed when naloxone is given to normal animals, since it would be predicted to cause withdrawal symptoms. This apparent discrepancy may be due to a differential mode of action of morphine and enkephalin at opiate receptors or to the existence of multiple categories of such receptors, as discussed above. There are certain opiates that are much weaker in competing for enkephalin than for naloxone and certain drugs that are about equipotent in this respect. In fact, it has been demonstrated that naloxone is relatively weak against enkephalin binding and potent against morphine binding. This may explain why it is more difficult to reverse the effects of endogenous enkephalin with naloxone than it is to reverse the effects of morphine and it could also explain the absence of naloxone-induced behavioral effects in the normal rat.",
author = "J. Hughes and Snyder, {Solomon H}",
year = "1978",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "298--299",
journal = "Neurosciences Research Program bulletin",
issn = "0028-3967",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opiate dependence and withdrawal

AU - Hughes, J.

AU - Snyder, Solomon H

PY - 1978

Y1 - 1978

N2 - The model proposed by Snyder does not help to explain the paradox that few behavioral alterations are observed when naloxone is given to normal animals, since it would be predicted to cause withdrawal symptoms. This apparent discrepancy may be due to a differential mode of action of morphine and enkephalin at opiate receptors or to the existence of multiple categories of such receptors, as discussed above. There are certain opiates that are much weaker in competing for enkephalin than for naloxone and certain drugs that are about equipotent in this respect. In fact, it has been demonstrated that naloxone is relatively weak against enkephalin binding and potent against morphine binding. This may explain why it is more difficult to reverse the effects of endogenous enkephalin with naloxone than it is to reverse the effects of morphine and it could also explain the absence of naloxone-induced behavioral effects in the normal rat.

AB - The model proposed by Snyder does not help to explain the paradox that few behavioral alterations are observed when naloxone is given to normal animals, since it would be predicted to cause withdrawal symptoms. This apparent discrepancy may be due to a differential mode of action of morphine and enkephalin at opiate receptors or to the existence of multiple categories of such receptors, as discussed above. There are certain opiates that are much weaker in competing for enkephalin than for naloxone and certain drugs that are about equipotent in this respect. In fact, it has been demonstrated that naloxone is relatively weak against enkephalin binding and potent against morphine binding. This may explain why it is more difficult to reverse the effects of endogenous enkephalin with naloxone than it is to reverse the effects of morphine and it could also explain the absence of naloxone-induced behavioral effects in the normal rat.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018191913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018191913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0018191913

VL - 16

SP - 298

EP - 299

JO - Neurosciences Research Program bulletin

JF - Neurosciences Research Program bulletin

SN - 0028-3967

IS - 2

ER -