Online transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol for measuring cortical physiology associated with response inhibition

Michael D. Guthrie, Donald L. Gilbert, David A. Huddleston, Ernest V. Pedapati, Paul S. Horn, Stewart H Mostofsky, Steve W. Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We describe the development of a reproducible, child-friendly motor response inhibition task suitable for online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) characterization of primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and inhibition. Motor response inhibition prevents unwanted actions and is abnormal in several neuropsychiatric conditions. TMS is a non-invasive technology that can quantify M1 excitability and inhibition using single-and paired-pulse protocols and can be precisely timed to study cortical physiology with high temporal resolution. We modified the original Slater-Hammel (S-H) stop signal task to create a "racecar" version with TMS pulses time-locked to intra-trial events. This task is self-paced, with each trial initiating after a button push to move the racecar towards the 800 ms target. GO trials require a finger-lift to stop the racecar just before this target. Interspersed randomly are STOP trials (25%) during which the dynamically adjusted stop signal prompts subjects to prevent finger-lift. For GO trials, TMS pulses were delivered at 650 ms after trial onset; whereas, for STOP trials, the TMS pulses occurred 150 ms after the stop signal. The timings of the TMS pulses were decided based on electroencephalography (EEG) studies showing event-related changes in these time ranges during stop signal tasks. This task was studied in 3 blocks at two study sites (n=38) and we recorded behavioral performance and event-related motor-evoked potentials (MEP). Regression modelling was used to analyze MEP amplitudes using age as a covariate with multiple independent variables (sex, study site, block, TMS pulse condition [single- vs. paired-pulse], trial condition [GO, successful STOP, failed STOP]). The analysis showed that TMS pulse condition (p<0.0001) and its interaction with trial condition (p=0.009) were significant. Future applications for this online S-H/TMS paradigm include the addition of simultaneous EEG acquisition to measure TMS-evoked EEG potentials. A potential limitation is that in children, the TMS pulse sound could affect behavioral task performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere56789
JournalJournal of Visualized Experiments
Volume2018
Issue number132
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 8 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Physiology
Bioelectric potentials
Electroencephalography
Motor Evoked Potentials
Fingers
Acoustic waves
Motor Cortex
Task Performance and Analysis
Evoked Potentials
Technology

Keywords

  • Children
  • Cortical inhibition
  • Issue 132
  • Neuroscience
  • Response inhibition
  • Short interval intracortical inhibition
  • Stop signal task
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)

Cite this

Online transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol for measuring cortical physiology associated with response inhibition. / Guthrie, Michael D.; Gilbert, Donald L.; Huddleston, David A.; Pedapati, Ernest V.; Horn, Paul S.; Mostofsky, Stewart H; Wu, Steve W.

In: Journal of Visualized Experiments, Vol. 2018, No. 132, e56789, 08.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Guthrie, Michael D. ; Gilbert, Donald L. ; Huddleston, David A. ; Pedapati, Ernest V. ; Horn, Paul S. ; Mostofsky, Stewart H ; Wu, Steve W. / Online transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol for measuring cortical physiology associated with response inhibition. In: Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2018 ; Vol. 2018, No. 132.
@article{5b6a2e0cba934805951b6e9ded48dbc2,
title = "Online transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol for measuring cortical physiology associated with response inhibition",
abstract = "We describe the development of a reproducible, child-friendly motor response inhibition task suitable for online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) characterization of primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and inhibition. Motor response inhibition prevents unwanted actions and is abnormal in several neuropsychiatric conditions. TMS is a non-invasive technology that can quantify M1 excitability and inhibition using single-and paired-pulse protocols and can be precisely timed to study cortical physiology with high temporal resolution. We modified the original Slater-Hammel (S-H) stop signal task to create a {"}racecar{"} version with TMS pulses time-locked to intra-trial events. This task is self-paced, with each trial initiating after a button push to move the racecar towards the 800 ms target. GO trials require a finger-lift to stop the racecar just before this target. Interspersed randomly are STOP trials (25{\%}) during which the dynamically adjusted stop signal prompts subjects to prevent finger-lift. For GO trials, TMS pulses were delivered at 650 ms after trial onset; whereas, for STOP trials, the TMS pulses occurred 150 ms after the stop signal. The timings of the TMS pulses were decided based on electroencephalography (EEG) studies showing event-related changes in these time ranges during stop signal tasks. This task was studied in 3 blocks at two study sites (n=38) and we recorded behavioral performance and event-related motor-evoked potentials (MEP). Regression modelling was used to analyze MEP amplitudes using age as a covariate with multiple independent variables (sex, study site, block, TMS pulse condition [single- vs. paired-pulse], trial condition [GO, successful STOP, failed STOP]). The analysis showed that TMS pulse condition (p<0.0001) and its interaction with trial condition (p=0.009) were significant. Future applications for this online S-H/TMS paradigm include the addition of simultaneous EEG acquisition to measure TMS-evoked EEG potentials. A potential limitation is that in children, the TMS pulse sound could affect behavioral task performance.",
keywords = "Children, Cortical inhibition, Issue 132, Neuroscience, Response inhibition, Short interval intracortical inhibition, Stop signal task, Transcranial magnetic stimulation",
author = "Guthrie, {Michael D.} and Gilbert, {Donald L.} and Huddleston, {David A.} and Pedapati, {Ernest V.} and Horn, {Paul S.} and Mostofsky, {Stewart H} and Wu, {Steve W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "8",
doi = "10.3791/56789",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2018",
journal = "Journal of Visualized Experiments",
issn = "1940-087X",
publisher = "MYJoVE Corporation",
number = "132",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Online transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol for measuring cortical physiology associated with response inhibition

AU - Guthrie, Michael D.

AU - Gilbert, Donald L.

AU - Huddleston, David A.

AU - Pedapati, Ernest V.

AU - Horn, Paul S.

AU - Mostofsky, Stewart H

AU - Wu, Steve W.

PY - 2018/2/8

Y1 - 2018/2/8

N2 - We describe the development of a reproducible, child-friendly motor response inhibition task suitable for online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) characterization of primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and inhibition. Motor response inhibition prevents unwanted actions and is abnormal in several neuropsychiatric conditions. TMS is a non-invasive technology that can quantify M1 excitability and inhibition using single-and paired-pulse protocols and can be precisely timed to study cortical physiology with high temporal resolution. We modified the original Slater-Hammel (S-H) stop signal task to create a "racecar" version with TMS pulses time-locked to intra-trial events. This task is self-paced, with each trial initiating after a button push to move the racecar towards the 800 ms target. GO trials require a finger-lift to stop the racecar just before this target. Interspersed randomly are STOP trials (25%) during which the dynamically adjusted stop signal prompts subjects to prevent finger-lift. For GO trials, TMS pulses were delivered at 650 ms after trial onset; whereas, for STOP trials, the TMS pulses occurred 150 ms after the stop signal. The timings of the TMS pulses were decided based on electroencephalography (EEG) studies showing event-related changes in these time ranges during stop signal tasks. This task was studied in 3 blocks at two study sites (n=38) and we recorded behavioral performance and event-related motor-evoked potentials (MEP). Regression modelling was used to analyze MEP amplitudes using age as a covariate with multiple independent variables (sex, study site, block, TMS pulse condition [single- vs. paired-pulse], trial condition [GO, successful STOP, failed STOP]). The analysis showed that TMS pulse condition (p<0.0001) and its interaction with trial condition (p=0.009) were significant. Future applications for this online S-H/TMS paradigm include the addition of simultaneous EEG acquisition to measure TMS-evoked EEG potentials. A potential limitation is that in children, the TMS pulse sound could affect behavioral task performance.

AB - We describe the development of a reproducible, child-friendly motor response inhibition task suitable for online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) characterization of primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and inhibition. Motor response inhibition prevents unwanted actions and is abnormal in several neuropsychiatric conditions. TMS is a non-invasive technology that can quantify M1 excitability and inhibition using single-and paired-pulse protocols and can be precisely timed to study cortical physiology with high temporal resolution. We modified the original Slater-Hammel (S-H) stop signal task to create a "racecar" version with TMS pulses time-locked to intra-trial events. This task is self-paced, with each trial initiating after a button push to move the racecar towards the 800 ms target. GO trials require a finger-lift to stop the racecar just before this target. Interspersed randomly are STOP trials (25%) during which the dynamically adjusted stop signal prompts subjects to prevent finger-lift. For GO trials, TMS pulses were delivered at 650 ms after trial onset; whereas, for STOP trials, the TMS pulses occurred 150 ms after the stop signal. The timings of the TMS pulses were decided based on electroencephalography (EEG) studies showing event-related changes in these time ranges during stop signal tasks. This task was studied in 3 blocks at two study sites (n=38) and we recorded behavioral performance and event-related motor-evoked potentials (MEP). Regression modelling was used to analyze MEP amplitudes using age as a covariate with multiple independent variables (sex, study site, block, TMS pulse condition [single- vs. paired-pulse], trial condition [GO, successful STOP, failed STOP]). The analysis showed that TMS pulse condition (p<0.0001) and its interaction with trial condition (p=0.009) were significant. Future applications for this online S-H/TMS paradigm include the addition of simultaneous EEG acquisition to measure TMS-evoked EEG potentials. A potential limitation is that in children, the TMS pulse sound could affect behavioral task performance.

KW - Children

KW - Cortical inhibition

KW - Issue 132

KW - Neuroscience

KW - Response inhibition

KW - Short interval intracortical inhibition

KW - Stop signal task

KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042026764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042026764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3791/56789

DO - 10.3791/56789

M3 - Article

VL - 2018

JO - Journal of Visualized Experiments

JF - Journal of Visualized Experiments

SN - 1940-087X

IS - 132

M1 - e56789

ER -