One outcome, many trends: Understanding national data sources for road traffic fatalities in China

Qingfeng Li, Huan He, Hailun Liang, David M Bishai, Adnan A. Hyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives. To better understand national data sources and evaluate time trends in road traffic fatalities (RTF) in China. Methods. Were viewed national sources on RTF data. These included population-based report from the Ministry of Public Security (MPS), sample-based estimates from the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Disease Surveillance Points System (DSP), as well as model-based estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). Results. All data sources have limitations in coverage, representativeness or overreliance on model specifications. Despite the discrepancies in methodologies and estimates, all sources indicated an increase in RTF before 2005. Since then, MPS and GBD indicated a decrease, DSP showed plateauing, and MOH and WHO suggested increasing fatalities. However, despite any recent decline, RTF remain high. Conclusions. The divergent trends in RTF across data sets in China implies a challenge to understanding China's experience with addressing RTF. China needs to reconcile data sources and further improve road safety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1793-1795
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume106
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Information Storage and Retrieval
China
Health
Safety
Population
Global Burden of Disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

One outcome, many trends : Understanding national data sources for road traffic fatalities in China. / Li, Qingfeng; He, Huan; Liang, Hailun; Bishai, David M; Hyder, Adnan A.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 106, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 1793-1795.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{99c98f4735b04a3daa85e2126ac66390,
title = "One outcome, many trends: Understanding national data sources for road traffic fatalities in China",
abstract = "Objectives. To better understand national data sources and evaluate time trends in road traffic fatalities (RTF) in China. Methods. Were viewed national sources on RTF data. These included population-based report from the Ministry of Public Security (MPS), sample-based estimates from the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Disease Surveillance Points System (DSP), as well as model-based estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). Results. All data sources have limitations in coverage, representativeness or overreliance on model specifications. Despite the discrepancies in methodologies and estimates, all sources indicated an increase in RTF before 2005. Since then, MPS and GBD indicated a decrease, DSP showed plateauing, and MOH and WHO suggested increasing fatalities. However, despite any recent decline, RTF remain high. Conclusions. The divergent trends in RTF across data sets in China implies a challenge to understanding China's experience with addressing RTF. China needs to reconcile data sources and further improve road safety.",
author = "Qingfeng Li and Huan He and Hailun Liang and Bishai, {David M} and Hyder, {Adnan A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2016.303287",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "1793--1795",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - One outcome, many trends

T2 - Understanding national data sources for road traffic fatalities in China

AU - Li, Qingfeng

AU - He, Huan

AU - Liang, Hailun

AU - Bishai, David M

AU - Hyder, Adnan A.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Objectives. To better understand national data sources and evaluate time trends in road traffic fatalities (RTF) in China. Methods. Were viewed national sources on RTF data. These included population-based report from the Ministry of Public Security (MPS), sample-based estimates from the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Disease Surveillance Points System (DSP), as well as model-based estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). Results. All data sources have limitations in coverage, representativeness or overreliance on model specifications. Despite the discrepancies in methodologies and estimates, all sources indicated an increase in RTF before 2005. Since then, MPS and GBD indicated a decrease, DSP showed plateauing, and MOH and WHO suggested increasing fatalities. However, despite any recent decline, RTF remain high. Conclusions. The divergent trends in RTF across data sets in China implies a challenge to understanding China's experience with addressing RTF. China needs to reconcile data sources and further improve road safety.

AB - Objectives. To better understand national data sources and evaluate time trends in road traffic fatalities (RTF) in China. Methods. Were viewed national sources on RTF data. These included population-based report from the Ministry of Public Security (MPS), sample-based estimates from the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Disease Surveillance Points System (DSP), as well as model-based estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). Results. All data sources have limitations in coverage, representativeness or overreliance on model specifications. Despite the discrepancies in methodologies and estimates, all sources indicated an increase in RTF before 2005. Since then, MPS and GBD indicated a decrease, DSP showed plateauing, and MOH and WHO suggested increasing fatalities. However, despite any recent decline, RTF remain high. Conclusions. The divergent trends in RTF across data sets in China implies a challenge to understanding China's experience with addressing RTF. China needs to reconcile data sources and further improve road safety.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988028761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988028761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303287

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303287

M3 - Article

C2 - 27552266

AN - SCOPUS:84988028761

VL - 106

SP - 1793

EP - 1795

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 10

ER -