One hundred years of psychiatry at johns hopkins a story of meyer to McHugh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article describes a history of clinical methods and constructs that guide Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Phipps Clinic today. The contributions of Adolf Meyer and Paul McHugh are central and closely connected. Both emphasize the clinical examination as the central practice of psychiatry as a specialty within medicine. Meyer's comprehensive examination of the patient became the centerpiece of his approach and was the standard for psychiatrists in the Englishspeaking world. McHugh, with Phillip Slavney, developed a pluralistic and practical framework for interpreting that history and examination. Both argued against the uncritical use of the modern disease construct. McHugh argues that the disease construct, although fundamental, is but one of four useful "perspectives of psychiatry" and is, thus, an insufficient basis for psychiatric practice. The perspectives could be used as an organizing framework by all physicians who seek a practical and truly personalized approach to the care of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)260-265
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Volume205
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Patient Care
History
Medicine
Physicians

Keywords

  • Clinical methods
  • Disease construct
  • Johns Hopkins
  • Personalized medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

One hundred years of psychiatry at johns hopkins a story of meyer to McHugh. / Depaulo, J Raymond.

In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 205, No. 4, 2017, p. 260-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{485eb98af9b641e9853337bb97253c24,
title = "One hundred years of psychiatry at johns hopkins a story of meyer to McHugh",
abstract = "This article describes a history of clinical methods and constructs that guide Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Phipps Clinic today. The contributions of Adolf Meyer and Paul McHugh are central and closely connected. Both emphasize the clinical examination as the central practice of psychiatry as a specialty within medicine. Meyer's comprehensive examination of the patient became the centerpiece of his approach and was the standard for psychiatrists in the Englishspeaking world. McHugh, with Phillip Slavney, developed a pluralistic and practical framework for interpreting that history and examination. Both argued against the uncritical use of the modern disease construct. McHugh argues that the disease construct, although fundamental, is but one of four useful {"}perspectives of psychiatry{"} and is, thus, an insufficient basis for psychiatric practice. The perspectives could be used as an organizing framework by all physicians who seek a practical and truly personalized approach to the care of patients.",
keywords = "Clinical methods, Disease construct, Johns Hopkins, Personalized medicine",
author = "Depaulo, {J Raymond}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1097/NMD.0000000000000602",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "205",
pages = "260--265",
journal = "Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease",
issn = "0022-3018",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - One hundred years of psychiatry at johns hopkins a story of meyer to McHugh

AU - Depaulo, J Raymond

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article describes a history of clinical methods and constructs that guide Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Phipps Clinic today. The contributions of Adolf Meyer and Paul McHugh are central and closely connected. Both emphasize the clinical examination as the central practice of psychiatry as a specialty within medicine. Meyer's comprehensive examination of the patient became the centerpiece of his approach and was the standard for psychiatrists in the Englishspeaking world. McHugh, with Phillip Slavney, developed a pluralistic and practical framework for interpreting that history and examination. Both argued against the uncritical use of the modern disease construct. McHugh argues that the disease construct, although fundamental, is but one of four useful "perspectives of psychiatry" and is, thus, an insufficient basis for psychiatric practice. The perspectives could be used as an organizing framework by all physicians who seek a practical and truly personalized approach to the care of patients.

AB - This article describes a history of clinical methods and constructs that guide Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Phipps Clinic today. The contributions of Adolf Meyer and Paul McHugh are central and closely connected. Both emphasize the clinical examination as the central practice of psychiatry as a specialty within medicine. Meyer's comprehensive examination of the patient became the centerpiece of his approach and was the standard for psychiatrists in the Englishspeaking world. McHugh, with Phillip Slavney, developed a pluralistic and practical framework for interpreting that history and examination. Both argued against the uncritical use of the modern disease construct. McHugh argues that the disease construct, although fundamental, is but one of four useful "perspectives of psychiatry" and is, thus, an insufficient basis for psychiatric practice. The perspectives could be used as an organizing framework by all physicians who seek a practical and truly personalized approach to the care of patients.

KW - Clinical methods

KW - Disease construct

KW - Johns Hopkins

KW - Personalized medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010843605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010843605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000602

DO - 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000602

M3 - Article

VL - 205

SP - 260

EP - 265

JO - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

JF - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

SN - 0022-3018

IS - 4

ER -