On the use of non-euclidean distance measures in geostatistics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In many scientific disciplines, straight line, Euclidean distances may not accurately describe proximity relationships among spatial data. However, non-Euclidean distance measures must be used with caution in geostatistical applications. A simple example is provided to demonstrate there are no guarantees that existing covariance and variogram functions remain valid (i.e. positive definite or conditionally negative definite) when used with a non-Euclidean distance measure. There are certain distance measures that when used with existing covariance and variogram functions remain valid, an issue that is explored. The concept of isometric embedding is introduced and linked to the concepts of positive and conditionally negative definiteness to demonstrate classes of valid norm dependent isotropic covariance and variogram functions, results many of which have yet to appear in the mainstream geostatistical literature or application. These classes of functions extend the well known classes by adding a parameter to define the distance norm. In practice, this distance parameter can be set a priori to represent, for example, the Euclidean distance, or kept as a parameter to allow the data to choose the metric. A simulated application of the latter is provided for demonstration. Simulation results are also presented comparing kriged predictions based on Euclidean distance to those based on using a water metric.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)907-926
Number of pages20
JournalMathematical Geology
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Geostatistics
geostatistics
variogram
Distance Measure
Variogram
Euclidean Distance
Valid
Norm
Isometric Embedding
spatial data
Metric
Spatial Data
Straight Line
Positive definite
Demonstrate
Proximity
Choose
prediction
Water
simulation

Keywords

  • Conditionally negative definite
  • Euclidean distance
  • Isometric embedding
  • Positive definite
  • Spatial dependence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Cite this

On the use of non-euclidean distance measures in geostatistics. / Curriero, Frank C.

In: Mathematical Geology, Vol. 38, No. 8, 11.2006, p. 907-926.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c540ba18b6944a0d86d84f5a86e18810,
title = "On the use of non-euclidean distance measures in geostatistics",
abstract = "In many scientific disciplines, straight line, Euclidean distances may not accurately describe proximity relationships among spatial data. However, non-Euclidean distance measures must be used with caution in geostatistical applications. A simple example is provided to demonstrate there are no guarantees that existing covariance and variogram functions remain valid (i.e. positive definite or conditionally negative definite) when used with a non-Euclidean distance measure. There are certain distance measures that when used with existing covariance and variogram functions remain valid, an issue that is explored. The concept of isometric embedding is introduced and linked to the concepts of positive and conditionally negative definiteness to demonstrate classes of valid norm dependent isotropic covariance and variogram functions, results many of which have yet to appear in the mainstream geostatistical literature or application. These classes of functions extend the well known classes by adding a parameter to define the distance norm. In practice, this distance parameter can be set a priori to represent, for example, the Euclidean distance, or kept as a parameter to allow the data to choose the metric. A simulated application of the latter is provided for demonstration. Simulation results are also presented comparing kriged predictions based on Euclidean distance to those based on using a water metric.",
keywords = "Conditionally negative definite, Euclidean distance, Isometric embedding, Positive definite, Spatial dependence",
author = "Curriero, {Frank C}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s11004-006-9055-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "907--926",
journal = "Mathematical Geosciences",
issn = "1874-8961",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the use of non-euclidean distance measures in geostatistics

AU - Curriero, Frank C

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - In many scientific disciplines, straight line, Euclidean distances may not accurately describe proximity relationships among spatial data. However, non-Euclidean distance measures must be used with caution in geostatistical applications. A simple example is provided to demonstrate there are no guarantees that existing covariance and variogram functions remain valid (i.e. positive definite or conditionally negative definite) when used with a non-Euclidean distance measure. There are certain distance measures that when used with existing covariance and variogram functions remain valid, an issue that is explored. The concept of isometric embedding is introduced and linked to the concepts of positive and conditionally negative definiteness to demonstrate classes of valid norm dependent isotropic covariance and variogram functions, results many of which have yet to appear in the mainstream geostatistical literature or application. These classes of functions extend the well known classes by adding a parameter to define the distance norm. In practice, this distance parameter can be set a priori to represent, for example, the Euclidean distance, or kept as a parameter to allow the data to choose the metric. A simulated application of the latter is provided for demonstration. Simulation results are also presented comparing kriged predictions based on Euclidean distance to those based on using a water metric.

AB - In many scientific disciplines, straight line, Euclidean distances may not accurately describe proximity relationships among spatial data. However, non-Euclidean distance measures must be used with caution in geostatistical applications. A simple example is provided to demonstrate there are no guarantees that existing covariance and variogram functions remain valid (i.e. positive definite or conditionally negative definite) when used with a non-Euclidean distance measure. There are certain distance measures that when used with existing covariance and variogram functions remain valid, an issue that is explored. The concept of isometric embedding is introduced and linked to the concepts of positive and conditionally negative definiteness to demonstrate classes of valid norm dependent isotropic covariance and variogram functions, results many of which have yet to appear in the mainstream geostatistical literature or application. These classes of functions extend the well known classes by adding a parameter to define the distance norm. In practice, this distance parameter can be set a priori to represent, for example, the Euclidean distance, or kept as a parameter to allow the data to choose the metric. A simulated application of the latter is provided for demonstration. Simulation results are also presented comparing kriged predictions based on Euclidean distance to those based on using a water metric.

KW - Conditionally negative definite

KW - Euclidean distance

KW - Isometric embedding

KW - Positive definite

KW - Spatial dependence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249786564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249786564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11004-006-9055-7

DO - 10.1007/s11004-006-9055-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34249786564

VL - 38

SP - 907

EP - 926

JO - Mathematical Geosciences

JF - Mathematical Geosciences

SN - 1874-8961

IS - 8

ER -