On the slope of the regression between stem cell divisions and cancer risk, and the lack of correlation between stem cell divisions and environmental factors-associated cancer risk

Cristian Tomasetti, Bert Vogelstein

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

We are pleased that the analyses on smoking and radiation performed by Little et al. support the idea that the effects of various environmental factors on cancer risk do not correlate significantly with the lifetime number of stem cell divisions. This provides further evidence that the correlation we obtained for the U.S., and similarly found across the rest of the world, is in general not due to environmental factors but rather is due to intrinsic ones. We also point out mathematical and conceptual mistakes in the analysis of Little et al. that led them to erroneous conclusions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPloS one
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the slope of the regression between stem cell divisions and cancer risk, and the lack of correlation between stem cell divisions and environmental factors-associated cancer risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this