@article{bbeaa903f38c43d5a1ec144d632fdeff,
title = "On narcissism and veiled innocence:. Prolegomena to a critique of criminal law",
author = "Siegel, {Andrew W.}",
note = "Funding Information: I would like to thank Leonard Kaplan, Lester Hunt, Thomas Spademan and Morris Eagle for their helpful comments, and the Institute for Legal Studies for fellowship support during work on this paper. “{\textquoteleft}Historically, our substantive criminal law is based upon a theory of punishing the vicious will. It postulates a free agent confronted with a choice between doing right and doing wrong and choosing freely to do wrong.” R. POUND, Introduction to Sayre, CASES ON CRIMINAL LAW (1927). “[The requirement of criminal intent] is as universal and persistent in mature systems of law as belief in freedom of the human will and a consequent ability and duty of the normal individual to choose between good and evil.” Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246,250 (1952).",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0160-2527(92)90007-n",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "339--346",
journal = "International Journal of Law and Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-2527",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",
}