On comparing biological shapes: Detection of influential landmarks

S. Lele, J. T. Richtsmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

For problems of classification and comparison in biological research, the primary focus is on the similarity of forms. A biological form consists of size and shape. Several approaches for comparing biological forms using landmark data are available. If the two biological forms are demonstrated to be different, the next important issue is to localize the differences by identifying those areas which differ most between the two objects. In this paper we suggest a technique to detect influential landmarks, those which contribute most to the difference between forms. We study the effectiveness of the technique using three-dimensional simulated data sets and two examples. Results suggest that the technique is useful in the study of biological form and its variation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-65
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume87
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Research
methodology
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Anthropology

Cite this

On comparing biological shapes : Detection of influential landmarks. / Lele, S.; Richtsmeier, J. T.

In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 87, No. 1, 1992, p. 49-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lele, S. ; Richtsmeier, J. T. / On comparing biological shapes : Detection of influential landmarks. In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1992 ; Vol. 87, No. 1. pp. 49-65.
@article{53398a2edc5848879d79d5c84395fee0,
title = "On comparing biological shapes: Detection of influential landmarks",
abstract = "For problems of classification and comparison in biological research, the primary focus is on the similarity of forms. A biological form consists of size and shape. Several approaches for comparing biological forms using landmark data are available. If the two biological forms are demonstrated to be different, the next important issue is to localize the differences by identifying those areas which differ most between the two objects. In this paper we suggest a technique to detect influential landmarks, those which contribute most to the difference between forms. We study the effectiveness of the technique using three-dimensional simulated data sets and two examples. Results suggest that the technique is useful in the study of biological form and its variation.",
author = "S. Lele and Richtsmeier, {J. T.}",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "49--65",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On comparing biological shapes

T2 - Detection of influential landmarks

AU - Lele, S.

AU - Richtsmeier, J. T.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - For problems of classification and comparison in biological research, the primary focus is on the similarity of forms. A biological form consists of size and shape. Several approaches for comparing biological forms using landmark data are available. If the two biological forms are demonstrated to be different, the next important issue is to localize the differences by identifying those areas which differ most between the two objects. In this paper we suggest a technique to detect influential landmarks, those which contribute most to the difference between forms. We study the effectiveness of the technique using three-dimensional simulated data sets and two examples. Results suggest that the technique is useful in the study of biological form and its variation.

AB - For problems of classification and comparison in biological research, the primary focus is on the similarity of forms. A biological form consists of size and shape. Several approaches for comparing biological forms using landmark data are available. If the two biological forms are demonstrated to be different, the next important issue is to localize the differences by identifying those areas which differ most between the two objects. In this paper we suggest a technique to detect influential landmarks, those which contribute most to the difference between forms. We study the effectiveness of the technique using three-dimensional simulated data sets and two examples. Results suggest that the technique is useful in the study of biological form and its variation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026583988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026583988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1736674

AN - SCOPUS:0026583988

VL - 87

SP - 49

EP - 65

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 1

ER -